Comments: 66
TheCreeper24 In reply to ??? [2016-07-04 21:57:52 +0000 UTC]
That wasn't the case at all; He knew like many in the scientific community at the time that birds were descendants of dinosaurs. It was this knowledge that made him decide to use reptilian a/o frog DNA when creating the dinosaurs instead of bird DNA because he feared the possible bird like appearance the dinosaurs might take on would go against how the public expected dinosaurs to look, and that was a big 'no-can-do' for Hammond, who wanted to show visitors the dinosaurs that they all expected. Also to note, in the novel Wu even says that he could have also bred the dinosaurs to appear sluggish and upright like older depictions that were still common during the time Jurassic Park was being constructed. I don't get why T-PEKC would put that in there.
And on a final note, is that Titanosaurus as your profile picture?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tcr11050 [2015-09-06 18:42:53 +0000 UTC]
Makes me wish this is official art for the franchise, like concept art, or book illustrations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheOneTrueSirCharles [2012-11-27 22:06:56 +0000 UTC]
You and Hellraptor have influenced me to draw some JP Raptors with feathers.
They look pretty cool with them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to TheOneTrueSirCharles [2012-12-01 19:46:49 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, JP raptors with feathers look interesting, though they still can't compare to the real animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
latilover [2010-10-26 03:16:06 +0000 UTC]
Also v.nublarensis is made up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
latilover [2010-10-26 03:15:30 +0000 UTC]
Actually it is a result of mongoleis and antirrhopus
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ebelesaurus [2010-05-27 14:46:45 +0000 UTC]
it looks like a v.nublarensis. is it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to ebelesaurus [2010-06-03 15:45:39 +0000 UTC]
Yes, it's "modified" version of V. nublarensis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ebelesaurus In reply to T-PEKC [2010-06-05 11:03:05 +0000 UTC]
are you ever gonna continue jp revelations?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shilyn [2009-04-27 07:24:23 +0000 UTC]
I know you're going for the movie model, but not only were velociraptors feathered, they were also only the size of turkeys. Deinonychus was closer to the movie size but admittedly it doesn't have as cool of a name.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JohnFaa [2009-04-19 13:36:23 +0000 UTC]
Needs more feathers actually, but nice picture nonetheless
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boverisuchus In reply to JohnFaa [2009-09-27 04:45:47 +0000 UTC]
depends on the climate.
There would have been quite afew velociraptor species in reality. So if you take a conservative approach, you'd get some "bald ones".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Boverisuchus [2009-09-27 08:42:44 +0000 UTC]
Actually no, feathers are efficient insulators, which means the can also help cool the animal down, not just heat it; its a common mistake to think that feathers cause only an animal to overheat.
Look, for example, at modern ratites. They are covered in a thick coat of feathers that could perhaps oveheat them, but yet they don't. Thanks to the structure of the feathers themselves and to the fact birds have a complex air sac system, they can control their body temperature way more efficiently than us and tthus they don't have ay reason to loose their valuable feathers.
The modern cassowary, for example, has the same body mass as a peccary, and yet while the mammal has a very short fur coat the bird is covered by long feathers
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Boverisuchus In reply to JohnFaa [2009-09-28 03:33:37 +0000 UTC]
Of course, I didnt think of that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AkabaneKurodoKun [2009-01-30 15:25:46 +0000 UTC]
Look more like a Chocobo in FinalFantasy ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kevcatalan [2009-01-19 22:57:26 +0000 UTC]
Its great to see how its still has that evil sinister look in its eyes *fav*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to Kevcatalan [2009-01-26 13:31:38 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dilong-paradoxus [2008-12-11 04:41:01 +0000 UTC]
Pretty awesome! I can't see the teeth in the upper jaw, though. It might just be the picture size...
It's great to have a current version of the Jurassic Park "Velociraptor"... (Crosses fingers and hopes for a really, really good remake that matches the story closer...)
Anyway, awesome picture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tomozaurus [2008-11-25 02:44:19 +0000 UTC]
Very awesome. You should do a male one with the Lost World colouration.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
guilmon182 [2008-09-30 01:00:07 +0000 UTC]
Amd here's-...AH, F@CK!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
guilmon182 [2008-08-23 20:58:30 +0000 UTC]
I love how he thinks there's something wrong because it has feathers! Very nice, T-PEKC.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to guilmon182 [2008-08-23 21:30:17 +0000 UTC]
That was the only logical idea that came to my mind. There is no other way to have feathered raptors in JP.
Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DSil [2008-08-23 18:47:08 +0000 UTC]
Very cool! I like the coloration. Weren't their tales longer than that, though? Also, the ones in the movie were way bigger than real velociraptors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to DSil [2008-08-23 21:29:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
You're right. The tail should be longer but I had not enough space on the paper, so I left it shorter. Anyway, this couldn't be excuse.
The movie raptors are really bigger than the real ones. That's because back then they thought that Deinonychus and Velociraptor are the same. The truth is that the JP raptors are actually based on Deinonychus. This is the reason for their big size.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DSil In reply to T-PEKC [2008-08-27 04:39:02 +0000 UTC]
That makes sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tharos222 [2008-08-23 12:42:27 +0000 UTC]
velociraptor antirhopus?....i know only deinonychus antirhopus
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Tharos222 In reply to T-PEKC [2008-08-24 14:20:52 +0000 UTC]
I thought JP velociraptor is Utahraptor
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
guilmon182 In reply to Tharos222 [2008-08-23 20:57:27 +0000 UTC]
At the time, scientists called Deinonychus Velociraptor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zoekozoeko [2008-08-23 11:17:51 +0000 UTC]
Very nice, even though I don't really like JP.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon [2008-08-23 10:59:21 +0000 UTC]
Jurassic Park take note! This is what dromaeosaurs looked like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-PEKC In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-08-23 21:13:24 +0000 UTC]
Well, it is not entirely accurate, but still closer to the real animals than what we see in the movies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to T-PEKC [2008-09-08 08:44:58 +0000 UTC]
It's more plausible, while adhering to the movie's aesthetic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PonchoFirewalker01 [2008-08-22 23:39:55 +0000 UTC]
Cool partner. In the book, they said that they used lizard, bird, and frog DNA to fill in the gaps of the dino DNA. So, it meght be from lizard DNA about the lack of feathers. You can look at my "Isla Sorna Ecosystem" to have JP excitement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PonchoFirewalker01 In reply to T-PEKC [2008-08-23 21:48:33 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. I love to join, I just don't know how.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShoopWoop17 In reply to PonchoFirewalker01 [2011-08-08 02:27:26 +0000 UTC]
Just wonderig on your ecosystem of sorna stuff (great stuff it is, as is all your writing) you didnt bring Dilophosaurus to Sorna. Is it because they arent in the lost world?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PonchoFirewalker01 In reply to ShoopWoop17 [2011-08-08 02:42:35 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, it's mostly because of that. But I also would think is that after they found out that they are venomous and shoot their venom, they stop cloning them for safety.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>