Comments: 23
alphaamino [2023-12-16 11:54:58 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
brialath [2023-01-24 22:30:32 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Daniel-McKnight [2019-01-24 13:49:28 +0000 UTC]
The consoles at those brown parts, what are they for? Also, upper deck, that room with the double bed at the elevator. I assume that the medbay (in need of a bacta tank, please add one), also where exactly a washing and drying machine would fit? Gotta clean our clothes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Daniel-McKnight [2018-11-10 15:50:24 +0000 UTC]
Is there a table of contents like at the MK-1 version of the deckplan? Or am I allowed to make one?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to Daniel-McKnight [2018-11-11 22:54:54 +0000 UTC]
Please go ahead and make one. I encourage anyone that likes my stuff to download it for themselves and use as they please. If you want to alter anything and repost it, just give a by-line to my original work. I have not been on here in a few years, (going back to school, no time) so please use what I've posted and enjoy it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mafia279 [2018-03-07 13:58:28 +0000 UTC]
Hey man, quick question. What software did you use for these? I swear I see deckplans all the time with what looks like the exact same floor style as yours, which makes me think it’s the same software, but for the life of me I cannot figure out what that software is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to mafia279 [2018-03-09 19:47:02 +0000 UTC]
hey there.... i used Photoshop. I just scanned some deck plans from books and cut/past alter stuff to make my plans. Other plans I used original artwork I made in photoshop. I don't have the program anymore, though i hear Gimp is a good alternative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mafia279 In reply to TattooedHobbit [2018-03-10 17:24:49 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, not on my phone actually, the mobile app is closer to the pixlr-o-matic version.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mafia279 In reply to TattooedHobbit [2018-03-10 17:15:51 +0000 UTC]
I actually use pixlr. It’s completely online and the editor version lets me use layers even on my phone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mafia279 [2016-12-31 09:00:11 +0000 UTC]
I've always thought there were two models of gozanti, the smaller, cheaper model, and the bigger, sturdier model. It's like an f-250 and an f-350 of the same model year. Almost identical in style, but one is gonna be wider, longer, taller, and tougher.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to mafia279 [2017-01-01 14:13:31 +0000 UTC]
I agree... there is no reason why there cannot be more than one model. It's like the HWK-290. Supposed to be a light cargo ship, but the description doesn't match. More like an assault helicopter. But I'm sure if you upscale everything, it could be a light freighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to mafia279 [2017-01-01 21:45:05 +0000 UTC]
ah... the hammerhead from old republic/rogue one! what a cool ship. yeah, if I only had the time! I'm still a Nebulon b frigate fan myself. It was a nice surprise to see a version of that ship in the new movie. as you can see, I have not posted any ships for some time. going back to college, full time job and a family kinda cuts down on the ship designing. someday i'll get back to it!!! promise!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mafia279 In reply to TattooedHobbit [2017-01-02 00:08:47 +0000 UTC]
Nebulon-b is, of course, a classic. I really just fell in love with the hammerhead (and ancestral models) because of rogue one, where they finally used one exactly as I wanted. BATTERING RAM. Which, btw, I've always thought the gozanti's could pull off too, with a couple engine upgrades and maybe some extra shielding for the view screens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
usoutlaw [2016-03-09 07:24:32 +0000 UTC]
i love this ship its the perfect size. the only thing i would do differently is change the bunks to single beds but that's mostly because i'd like a smaller more family like crew maybe 6+me and 2 or 3 astro mechs. also i think there should be like a guide that tells you what room is what. also i was wondering about her engines are they like the original ones or are they better. that was one of my sticking points on the original ship was that it was too slow like half the speed of a passenger jet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to usoutlaw [2016-03-11 14:40:37 +0000 UTC]
Honestly, I made up this deck plan, and as you can see, I've changed it a few times based on size differences in the different versions. This ship is whatever you would like it to be! Those bunks can be single or double or even triple. one of those rooms with the two bunks can be for the officers/pilots or one could be a med bay. I can't leave well enough alone, and keep refining and redrawing this ship because I love it. I'm working on another version based on the 63.8 meter official length according to Star Wars Rebels, but I want to use the old wing structure and add some engines. Remember, the Falcon looks like it has the original engines, but Han upgraded them. I would assume your ship would have better engines also!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
usoutlaw In reply to TattooedHobbit [2016-03-11 21:46:43 +0000 UTC]
^_^ thanks for the respond. and yea i guess it really could be what ever i wanted
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TattooedHobbit In reply to Weldun [2015-02-20 18:20:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks.... i like this version, but my Imperial version at 75 meters is my favorite size. Although after i figured out that size (75m) with placement of tie fighters and such, official cannon comes out and says it's 63.4 meters! I think that is just too small.
as for any ship in the Star Wars Cannon... art dept's have ships commissioned and slap some stats to line up with whatever project they're working on. then it becomes cannon. even though there is no way it's possible. (take the Moldy Crow, HWK-290) stats say it's a freighter, but clearly it's more in line with a apache helicopter in size and cockpit design. no room for anything else really.
from now on, if i see a ship, i ignore the stats and make the ship fit whatever i can in it's design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ultrabountyhunter [2013-01-25 02:23:45 +0000 UTC]
Wow, I really like the new design. It's amazing, nice to see there's plenty of room.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TattooedHobbit In reply to Ultrabountyhunter [2013-01-25 13:56:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanks... I'm really happy with it too. Much better for a mobile base of operations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0