HOME | DD

temiel — The Mockingbird's Bower

Published: 2010-03-11 04:19:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 4474; Favourites: 145; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "The mouth that has been kissed does not lose its savour,
indeed it renews itself just as the moon does."
~The Decameron

I'm sure our little Mockingbird has had more than a few portraits painted of her... the trick, I imagine, is getting her to sit still and not make eyes at the artist.

This was a big ol' experiment, so please be gentle.

There's a sketch here, but at this point it's almost all PS and Painter X.
Credit where it's due: this was made with sincerest apologies to Rossetti... this is a complete and total riff on Bocca Baciata [link]
In the process, I referred to =morganagod 's excellent tutorial [link] endlessly, it helped SO much.
Related content
Comments: 138

solfieri [2010-03-13 19:44:08 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Seeing this show up in my inbox was a pleasant surprise! It's easily noticeable this is one of your most daring endeavours to step out of your comfort zone, and the result looks great, even if it's an experiment. The influence from the old masters is visible (granted, Rossetti doesn't count as an old master, but he did emulate them e.deviantart.net/emoticons/x/x… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title="XD - "/> but I digress), which lends the image much of its appeal.
While I did say the painting looks great for being an experiment, there are still things I'd like to point out.

The lighting is well conveyed and I really love how you made blueish tones mix so well with browns and pinks for the flesh. However, I think more volume could have been conveyed if you used more tones "in-between" (in Portuguese we call these tones half-tones or half-tints, not only in printing but in painting as well - I have no idea how you call these in English) the dark shadows and the rosy tones of the lit areas, as well as painting reflexes in the dark areas (such as the shadow cast by her face over her neck): compare with the original "Bocca Baciata" and notice the range of browns, reds and greens for the shadows on her neck, whereas the yellows (the lit parts) are less "obvious". Also, the shadow on the right part of her nose could be lighter and wider to convey more depth.

On the other hand, I love her anatomy, her hands and elongated neck and cleavage look realistic and at the same time retain that stylized anatomy that is so much "your own". Also, I love how her blue eyes stand out among such warm tones, to me that's the icing of the cake for this painting. e.deviantart.net/emoticons/h/h… " width="15" height="13" alt="" title="Heart - "/>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to solfieri [2010-03-15 14:55:32 +0000 UTC]

HRF, I'm SO sorry it took me so long to respond to this-- I was away this weekend and didn't have a chance to write as much as I wanted to.

Weirdly enough, when I started this one I didn't really see it as "stepping out of my comfort zone", but in retrospect, I really did. OPAQUE PAINT ON TOP OF A SKETCH INSTEAD OF UNDER?! MULTIPLE GLAZING LAYERS?! WTF IS THAT??!! I'm glad you like it-- I'm just very pleased that it ended up looking REMOTELY like I imagined it looking in my head.

What you're saying about the half-tints sounds like what =Cacodaemonia said when she mentioned there's not a lot of gradation (particularly on the skin) between the green shadows and the more rosy areas. I mentioned to her that I kind of rushed this one toward the end, just because I didn't want to have to leave it for a whole day and then come back and hate it the next evening and want to restart it all over (DAY JOOOOB... ). You're definitely right about there being a lot more color variation on the shadows in the original. As I've mentioned, I'm still slowly getting the hang of lighting and how it works. The response I've gotten from this one indicates that I should probably incorporate a lot more reflected lighting from the environments, which I have to admit is something I've never really considered a lot (in fact, I think I was looking at one of *shideh 's walkthroughs recently and she mentioned reflected light, and I read that and realized I'd forgotten it even existed as a concept! BIG failure. ).

Thanks so much for the really in-depth crit. I always appreciate them, even though I don't usually put the full Crit Request up just because I don't want my watchers to feel obligated to do them if they'd rather not (I usually figure if people see something worth mentioning, they can call me out on it in a plain old comment).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

solfieri In reply to temiel [2010-03-18 02:24:02 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry, I didn't feel at all obligated! I just thought that, since I haven't commented for so long, I could write a critique in a piece that I particularly *loved*!

I'm just glad I could help! Sorry if I repeated things others had said, I didn't read all the comments/critiques. xD
About the reflected lights thing, I usually completely ignore them too. *shideh 's walkthrough made me realise soooo many things I didn't even know were possible. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bratkitty [2010-03-11 05:32:21 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I like the blending of colors and the color scheme you're using for this. The redness gives her skin a flush that's very believable, and I like how you put the green in, reflecting what looks to be the environment. I think you handled the complementary colors quite well.
The face and hands are really well done, but I think around her shoulders it tends to lose its sense of form a bit. Maybe adding in some highlights and sharpening the edges would help. Or adding some of that green into the shadows a bit.
My advice would be to sort of try balancing hard and soft edges more. The colors and lights and darks are great. I'd just give them some more definite edges to keep them from fading into the background.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to bratkitty [2010-03-11 05:36:32 +0000 UTC]

Yes, you're totally right. A couple other people mentioned just those things-- the green in the shadows, and the sharper edges-- and they're certainly things I know I need to work on since I'm so brand-new at this whole... opaque painting thing. Thanks for the tips!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bratkitty In reply to temiel [2010-03-11 06:19:38 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. ^^ So far you're off to a good start.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NuBearEull [2010-03-11 04:57:22 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I can see you stepping outside of your regular boundaries and that is to be commended. I love your use of deep, rich colors ... especially in the reds and golds. Gold is HARD, and for your success here, you have my awe. The unexpected colors (the pinks, greens and blues in the skin) are vivid and make an amazing impact and makes her skin very touchable. Be wary of losing your dark tones in the figure and the robe, though. Perhaps carrying more of the deep green in the background into some of the deeper creases of her robe. I am sure that in practicing a new technique, the colors were your first concern. The effort has paid off.

The anatomy in her hands is excellent! The little curve in the pinky finger of her left hand is particularly pleasing. It's little details like the finger that make your art stand out. I would watch the anatomy in her neck and the placement of her ear. Though, for what it's worth, stylistically it works. My style wouldn't allow for it. Yours does.

You are to be commended for trying something new. I'd pursue it if I were you!

(P.S. She really reminds me of Satine in Moulin Rouge ... which is a good thing ... because I loved her!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to NuBearEull [2010-03-11 05:04:45 +0000 UTC]

I approve of your two stars for originality. I ARE UNCREATIVE.

Seriously, though, you're totally right about my horrible ears. In the original painting the figure's head was at a different angle, so I didn't really have a proper reference for the ear (well, I could've found one, but I'm lazy ).

Thanks about the hand positions-- the reason I picked this painting to refer to was totally because of that really delicate hand position, I'm totally in love with it. I'm glad I replicated it okay!

Also, thanks for the tip on the darker folds picking up the green-- I'm only JUST getting the hang of proper environmental lighting and how it effects the lights and darks on a figure (I keep telling people, how did I make it through art school with such obvious deficiency in stuff like lighting?! ). It's definitely something I need to keep an eye on in the future.

P.S. re Satine-- I'm actually really glad she reminds you of her, because even though when I came up with Rian I wasn't really thinking of Satine, Rian reminds me a lot of her! When I was making her soundtrack, I put "Sparkling Diamonds" on there, because it's so unabashedly a Rian song to me. :3

Thanks a lot for the helpful crit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cacodaemonia [2010-03-11 04:48:35 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Very pretty! Something about it reminds me of the Pre-Raphaelites. e.deviantart.net/emoticons/s/s… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title=" (Smile) - "/> I love how the embellishments on her clothing match her hair, so it almost feels like the two are flowing into each other. The rose and hair decoration are both lovely.

There are a few areas that I think could use improvement. Her left eye (on our right) seems a bit too small, or maybe a bit too high up on her face. I like how you used a variety of colors in her skin, but in some spots (like her lower jaw, the base of her neck) the contrast between pink and greenish is a bit jarring. It may just be my monitor, but a little more blending in those areas couldn't hurt. Lastly - and I have so many problems with this - I think you could work on a greater variety of edges. What I mean to say is that almost all the edges in this are very soft and fuzzy. If you sharpened up a few in the focal areas - like her hands and face, it would really attract the eye.

Very nice experiment! e.deviantart.net/emoticons/b/b… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title=" (Big Grin) - "/>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to Cacodaemonia [2010-03-11 04:56:44 +0000 UTC]

"Something about" indeed, considering I blatantly snitched the pose and almost all her accoutrements from a Rossetti painting.

The eye thing is probably due to a flaw in the sketch that I didn't catch initially, and then just got exacerbated in the actual painting. You're SO RIGHT about the edges... I'm really, REALLY new to this whole digital painting thing, especially if I'm not relying on lines to do the sharpening for me, so you've totally got a point. Honestly, I only spent about 6 hours on this (I worked on it from the time I got home from work until about... 10:15 at night?), and I was really tired of looking at it. If I were less lazy and complacent I would've let it sit until tomorrow when I could refine it, but I really didn't want to go to work tomorrow knowing I had a whole gorgeous painting I couldn't finish because I was AT WORK. >_< So I sort of rushed the end stages as a result.

I think I see what you mean about the pink/greenish contrast. On the one hand, I don't usually mind blending stuff more, but I wanted to avoid that sort of airbrushy smoothness that my stuff usually has (which works for something that's made of lines, but less so for something painterly). If you have any tips on how to avoid that effect while still making it blended enough not to look like a giant green spot on her chin, I'm all ears.

Thanks so much for the crit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cacodaemonia In reply to temiel [2010-03-12 19:22:15 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, I know the feeling. Sometimes I'll post stuff at night, then when I look at it again the next day I notice all these errors and things. XD

As for avoiding the airbrush thing... I really don't know. Maybe using some colors that are in between the pink and the green? Just little dabs here and there along the border?

No problem. I hope it was somehow helpful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to Cacodaemonia [2010-03-12 19:53:47 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry, it was indeed helpful. I haven't quite got the hang of this yet, so I need all the help I can get.

Come to think of it, I could probably stand to have built up those undertones more, which would've avoided the abrupt shift in color. The method I was using works sort of like oil glazing, so it's likely I didn't take enough care with the undercoat before slapping the topcoat on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cacodaemonia In reply to temiel [2010-03-12 23:45:49 +0000 UTC]

Huh, interesting. I've never used oils, but I think I kind of know about the method you're talking about. Seems like it would take a long time with traditional media.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DJ-Uni-Mekaju [2010-08-08 13:58:05 +0000 UTC]

Wow...I just love how this feels so old.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dustfae [2010-04-30 18:16:57 +0000 UTC]

I love Rossetti ^-^

Do not apologize, it is beautiful and you made it your own

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to dustfae [2010-05-01 00:19:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh, me too!! I'm so glad you like this, it was so much fun to do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gppr [2010-04-21 19:26:08 +0000 UTC]

She looks elegant and soft at the same time. I like the painting style on this one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to gppr [2010-04-21 22:10:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I'm really glad you like it, it was definitely a departure for me so I'm happy it's successful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ppgrainbow [2010-04-20 07:31:20 +0000 UTC]

She came out really incredible, because of the way how you did her hair flowing down her body and the clothing that she's wearing.

I even love how you did her facial features!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to ppgrainbow [2010-04-20 12:19:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I had fun bringing a little more "realism" and dimension to her features this time around, since I'm usually so linear.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ppgrainbow In reply to temiel [2010-04-20 17:57:03 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! It's so much fun doing this painting of her!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Verdokai [2010-04-11 22:15:18 +0000 UTC]

I very much like her fleshy eyes! And the warm colours. And the pretty hands <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to Verdokai [2010-04-11 22:31:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh, thanks so much! I was REALLY proud of this when I finished it. The hands were a lot of fun to do, because I basically just copied the "Bocca Baciata" hand position, which I LOVE. I think I initially intended to make the whites of her eyes more... white, but I liked it this way, it looks more "old" somehow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

carolinejamhour [2010-04-11 17:11:42 +0000 UTC]

Damn, sorry! I somehow missed what you wrote about Rossetti on the description. Little letters, hahah... >_<

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

carolinejamhour [2010-04-11 17:10:38 +0000 UTC]

Wow, beautiful! This reminds me of the paintings by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, maybe you took some inspiration on those? I love the golden-red waves on her hair... and her hands are so elegant! Great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to carolinejamhour [2010-04-11 17:26:12 +0000 UTC]

Lol, yes! I saw your other comment too-- gotta love those little letters screwing everything up. I was so in love with that hand position. There's a guy commenting below that insists one should never copy Rossetti hands because he was "notoriously bad at them"... really? Really? One of my consistent favorite things about his paintings are the hands. They're so graceful and expressive and they seem very statuesque. I don't care if they're not 100% realistic, I like them!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lureofthewest [2010-03-30 19:24:25 +0000 UTC]

Love the color choices!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to lureofthewest [2010-03-30 20:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! A lot of the time I tend to use really pale, desaturated colors, so this time I wanted to do something that looked really rich and opaque.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lureofthewest In reply to temiel [2010-03-30 21:04:58 +0000 UTC]

It is really rich looking. I agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DavinArfel [2010-03-25 13:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Just an amazing drawing *.* !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to DavinArfel [2010-03-25 13:23:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I was really proud of this one, so I'm very glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JubeiSpiegel [2010-03-23 22:38:55 +0000 UTC]

So how did you feel about working without lines? It's pretty awesome to see the image take shape with just contrast and colors. Nice job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to JubeiSpiegel [2010-03-23 22:41:34 +0000 UTC]

There was a line drawing originally, it's just buried under layer upon layer of opaque paint so now you can't see it anymore! I'm not sure if I really liked "working without lines" so much as I just liked doing this particular project. If I hadn't had something to refer to I would've been lost, which I have to admit I don't like... I hate being tied to reference to know how to do something.

But I'm glad you like it, it was certainly a fun experiment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MerinkArt [2010-03-16 23:53:54 +0000 UTC]

Looks like an old painting by a master

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to MerinkArt [2010-03-16 23:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Ah, thank you! I don't think it's quite THAT good, but I did model it after this one, for what it's worth: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ADYJB [2010-03-16 00:43:49 +0000 UTC]

temiel
Never try to copy any of Rossettis hands, he was known for not being very good at painting them!


*solfieri "(granted, Rossetti doesn't count as an old master, but he did emulate them but I digress)"

Sorry had to mention here that i think you will find Rossetti (even though he wasn't good at hands!) along with the other Pre-Raphaelites are now considered by Art Scholars to be Old Masters as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to ADYJB [2010-03-16 00:59:50 +0000 UTC]

See, I knew if I tried to do a Rossetti-style painting there'd be someone talking about the hands. Regardless of whether or not he's "known" to be "not very good" at them, I really like the anatomy of his hands. Even if it's not accurate, I personally find them to be really graceful and expressive; I get inspiration from the pose and the gesture over exact anatomy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ADYJB In reply to temiel [2010-03-16 01:08:52 +0000 UTC]

lol, sorry couldn't resist. But i do like your reasoning and it's fair enough reasoning so i will let you off. Have you seen any Rossetti in the galleries? Incredible, so much better seeing the real paintings than prints in a book.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to ADYJB [2010-03-16 01:14:13 +0000 UTC]

I've seen "A Sea-Spell" at the Fogg Museum at Harvard, but I haven't been fortunate enough to see any others. (Though I do think the MFA has the one I modeled this after, at least sometimes... I haven't seen it on display, though, I think they put it in storage occasionally.) I was amazed by how large it was. Seeing pictures of it, I always envisioned it being much smaller. I'll have to go to the Fogg again before I move away and see everything again, they have an amazing collection of medieval through Romantic-era art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ADYJB In reply to temiel [2010-03-16 01:22:35 +0000 UTC]

Ah thats good that you have seen that. That was something that struck me upon seeing his paintings, the scale of them. I live in the UK near Manchester where they have a collection of Pre Raphaelite works including Rossettis and J W Waterhouse and then other side in Liverpool more Pre-Raphaelites. To the south in Birmingham is the best collection but then London you have the Tate where i saw J E Millais Ophelia and the V&A which was another Rossetti although the title of the painting escapes me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to ADYJB [2010-03-16 01:37:46 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I'd LOVE to see any of the originals in person (especially the Millais Ophelia). Someday I absolutely have to go around Europe on an art-viewing quest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HopelessBeliever [2010-03-13 17:36:50 +0000 UTC]

Love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to HopelessBeliever [2010-03-14 15:16:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! It was definitely different for me to do, but it was a lot of fun.

How are you doing, by the way? I'm really excited to see the finished version of the Cinderella Complex sketch if you're still planning on working it up!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HopelessBeliever In reply to temiel [2010-03-17 16:36:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I've been on hiatus for a while and now it's finals week. I will get to it eventually. Maybe on the spring break

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to HopelessBeliever [2010-03-17 16:38:25 +0000 UTC]

AFFF, finals!! Thank goodness I'll never have to do THAT again. Good luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glorycolor [2010-03-13 06:11:36 +0000 UTC]

Wow Molly, your coloring is his is superb. The warm palette really draws in the eyes. I swear I could stare at her lips for minutes. She looks gorgeous! are you planning on making another piece like this with Farael to pair them up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to glorycolor [2010-03-13 12:11:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! I had a lot of fun using these really rich colors, since normally I skew toward the lighter side of things. I am actually planning to do something like this with Farael-- I'm using this painting as a model for it: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

samohsai [2010-03-13 02:41:26 +0000 UTC]

OH MAN this is was cool! Your painting technique is awesome, it looks just like something I'd see in an art exposition.

AND I GOTTA SAY, I'M LOVING THOSE COLOURS. and her expression! c:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

temiel In reply to samohsai [2010-03-13 03:22:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!! I'm glad you think so, I'm really new at digital painting so I"m glad the technique looks okay. I'm SO pleased with the colors in this one, I really like this kind of palette.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Larissa-Bright [2010-03-12 18:39:34 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm did Desperate Romantics play a hand in this? I like the experiment; for the portrait looking you're aiming at, it really works! I like the darkened reds and golds and the hints of green in the hair and flesh; looks very "painty".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>