Comments: 138
solfieri [2010-03-13 19:44:08 +0000 UTC]
Overall
Vision
Originality
Technique
Impact
Seeing this show up in my inbox was a pleasant surprise! It's easily noticeable this is one of your most daring endeavours to step out of your comfort zone, and the result looks great, even if it's an experiment. The influence from the old masters is visible (granted, Rossetti doesn't count as an old master, but he did emulate them e.deviantart.net/emoticons/x/x… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title="XD - "/> but I digress), which lends the image much of its appeal.
While I did say the painting looks great for being an experiment, there are still things I'd like to point out.
The lighting is well conveyed and I really love how you made blueish tones mix so well with browns and pinks for the flesh. However, I think more volume could have been conveyed if you used more tones "in-between" (in Portuguese we call these tones half-tones or half-tints, not only in printing but in painting as well - I have no idea how you call these in English) the dark shadows and the rosy tones of the lit areas, as well as painting reflexes in the dark areas (such as the shadow cast by her face over her neck): compare with the original "Bocca Baciata" and notice the range of browns, reds and greens for the shadows on her neck, whereas the yellows (the lit parts) are less "obvious". Also, the shadow on the right part of her nose could be lighter and wider to convey more depth.
On the other hand, I love her anatomy, her hands and elongated neck and cleavage look realistic and at the same time retain that stylized anatomy that is so much "your own". Also, I love how her blue eyes stand out among such warm tones, to me that's the icing of the cake for this painting. e.deviantart.net/emoticons/h/h… " width="15" height="13" alt="" title="Heart - "/>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
temiel In reply to solfieri [2010-03-15 14:55:32 +0000 UTC]
HRF, I'm SO sorry it took me so long to respond to this-- I was away this weekend and didn't have a chance to write as much as I wanted to.
Weirdly enough, when I started this one I didn't really see it as "stepping out of my comfort zone", but in retrospect, I really did. OPAQUE PAINT ON TOP OF A SKETCH INSTEAD OF UNDER?! MULTIPLE GLAZING LAYERS?! WTF IS THAT??!! I'm glad you like it-- I'm just very pleased that it ended up looking REMOTELY like I imagined it looking in my head.
What you're saying about the half-tints sounds like what =Cacodaemonia said when she mentioned there's not a lot of gradation (particularly on the skin) between the green shadows and the more rosy areas. I mentioned to her that I kind of rushed this one toward the end, just because I didn't want to have to leave it for a whole day and then come back and hate it the next evening and want to restart it all over (DAY JOOOOB... ). You're definitely right about there being a lot more color variation on the shadows in the original. As I've mentioned, I'm still slowly getting the hang of lighting and how it works. The response I've gotten from this one indicates that I should probably incorporate a lot more reflected lighting from the environments, which I have to admit is something I've never really considered a lot (in fact, I think I was looking at one of *shideh 's walkthroughs recently and she mentioned reflected light, and I read that and realized I'd forgotten it even existed as a concept! BIG failure. ).
Thanks so much for the really in-depth crit. I always appreciate them, even though I don't usually put the full Crit Request up just because I don't want my watchers to feel obligated to do them if they'd rather not (I usually figure if people see something worth mentioning, they can call me out on it in a plain old comment).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
temiel In reply to NuBearEull [2010-03-11 05:04:45 +0000 UTC]
I approve of your two stars for originality. I ARE UNCREATIVE.
Seriously, though, you're totally right about my horrible ears. In the original painting the figure's head was at a different angle, so I didn't really have a proper reference for the ear (well, I could've found one, but I'm lazy ).
Thanks about the hand positions-- the reason I picked this painting to refer to was totally because of that really delicate hand position, I'm totally in love with it. I'm glad I replicated it okay!
Also, thanks for the tip on the darker folds picking up the green-- I'm only JUST getting the hang of proper environmental lighting and how it effects the lights and darks on a figure (I keep telling people, how did I make it through art school with such obvious deficiency in stuff like lighting?! ). It's definitely something I need to keep an eye on in the future.
P.S. re Satine-- I'm actually really glad she reminds you of her, because even though when I came up with Rian I wasn't really thinking of Satine, Rian reminds me a lot of her! When I was making her soundtrack, I put "Sparkling Diamonds" on there, because it's so unabashedly a Rian song to me. :3
Thanks a lot for the helpful crit!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
temiel In reply to Cacodaemonia [2010-03-11 04:56:44 +0000 UTC]
"Something about" indeed, considering I blatantly snitched the pose and almost all her accoutrements from a Rossetti painting.
The eye thing is probably due to a flaw in the sketch that I didn't catch initially, and then just got exacerbated in the actual painting. You're SO RIGHT about the edges... I'm really, REALLY new to this whole digital painting thing, especially if I'm not relying on lines to do the sharpening for me, so you've totally got a point. Honestly, I only spent about 6 hours on this (I worked on it from the time I got home from work until about... 10:15 at night?), and I was really tired of looking at it. If I were less lazy and complacent I would've let it sit until tomorrow when I could refine it, but I really didn't want to go to work tomorrow knowing I had a whole gorgeous painting I couldn't finish because I was AT WORK. >_< So I sort of rushed the end stages as a result.
I think I see what you mean about the pink/greenish contrast. On the one hand, I don't usually mind blending stuff more, but I wanted to avoid that sort of airbrushy smoothness that my stuff usually has (which works for something that's made of lines, but less so for something painterly). If you have any tips on how to avoid that effect while still making it blended enough not to look like a giant green spot on her chin, I'm all ears.
Thanks so much for the crit!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cacodaemonia In reply to temiel [2010-03-12 23:45:49 +0000 UTC]
Huh, interesting. I've never used oils, but I think I kind of know about the method you're talking about. Seems like it would take a long time with traditional media.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
temiel In reply to ppgrainbow [2010-04-20 12:19:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much! I had fun bringing a little more "realism" and dimension to her features this time around, since I'm usually so linear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Verdokai [2010-04-11 22:15:18 +0000 UTC]
I very much like her fleshy eyes! And the warm colours. And the pretty hands <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
carolinejamhour [2010-04-11 17:11:42 +0000 UTC]
Damn, sorry! I somehow missed what you wrote about Rossetti on the description. Little letters, hahah... >_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lureofthewest [2010-03-30 19:24:25 +0000 UTC]
Love the color choices!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lureofthewest In reply to temiel [2010-03-30 21:04:58 +0000 UTC]
It is really rich looking. I agree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DavinArfel [2010-03-25 13:19:29 +0000 UTC]
Just an amazing drawing *.* !!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MerinkArt [2010-03-16 23:53:54 +0000 UTC]
Looks like an old painting by a master
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ADYJB [2010-03-16 00:43:49 +0000 UTC]
temiel
Never try to copy any of Rossettis hands, he was known for not being very good at painting them!
*solfieri "(granted, Rossetti doesn't count as an old master, but he did emulate them but I digress)"
Sorry had to mention here that i think you will find Rossetti (even though he wasn't good at hands!) along with the other Pre-Raphaelites are now considered by Art Scholars to be Old Masters as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
temiel In reply to ADYJB [2010-03-16 01:14:13 +0000 UTC]
I've seen "A Sea-Spell" at the Fogg Museum at Harvard, but I haven't been fortunate enough to see any others. (Though I do think the MFA has the one I modeled this after, at least sometimes... I haven't seen it on display, though, I think they put it in storage occasionally.) I was amazed by how large it was. Seeing pictures of it, I always envisioned it being much smaller. I'll have to go to the Fogg again before I move away and see everything again, they have an amazing collection of medieval through Romantic-era art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ADYJB In reply to temiel [2010-03-16 01:22:35 +0000 UTC]
Ah thats good that you have seen that. That was something that struck me upon seeing his paintings, the scale of them. I live in the UK near Manchester where they have a collection of Pre Raphaelite works including Rossettis and J W Waterhouse and then other side in Liverpool more Pre-Raphaelites. To the south in Birmingham is the best collection but then London you have the Tate where i saw J E Millais Ophelia and the V&A which was another Rossetti although the title of the painting escapes me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
glorycolor [2010-03-13 06:11:36 +0000 UTC]
Wow Molly, your coloring is his is superb. The warm palette really draws in the eyes. I swear I could stare at her lips for minutes. She looks gorgeous! are you planning on making another piece like this with Farael to pair them up?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
temiel In reply to glorycolor [2010-03-13 12:11:43 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! I had a lot of fun using these really rich colors, since normally I skew toward the lighter side of things. I am actually planning to do something like this with Farael-- I'm using this painting as a model for it: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
samohsai [2010-03-13 02:41:26 +0000 UTC]
OH MAN this is was cool! Your painting technique is awesome, it looks just like something I'd see in an art exposition.
AND I GOTTA SAY, I'M LOVING THOSE COLOURS. and her expression! c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>