HOME | DD

thefooltouchstone β€” Shipstars1

Published: 2013-05-25 01:48:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 2065; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 35
Redirect to original
Description star field and star trek...a test...enjoy!
Related content
Comments: 15

japender61 [2016-03-06 14:53:30 +0000 UTC]

Cool! Please tell me you have one with phaser banks in action!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thefooltouchstone In reply to japender61 [2016-03-07 22:31:36 +0000 UTC]



not yet, but we'll see!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vegitto26 [2015-09-04 17:01:30 +0000 UTC]

A real good effect, very belivable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thefooltouchstone In reply to Vegitto26 [2015-09-06 14:15:02 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LouieD0g [2013-05-25 01:52:18 +0000 UTC]

Hm... refit nacelles on a TOS Enterprise?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thefooltouchstone In reply to LouieD0g [2013-05-25 13:47:52 +0000 UTC]

I won't delve too deeply into Trek Geek Lore Details (TGLD) but this the Lexington, not the Enterprise...[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LouieD0g In reply to thefooltouchstone [2013-06-01 15:36:19 +0000 UTC]

I see. Since a not inconsiderable amount of canon Trek is questionable (Ambassador class, for instance) I make extra sure to stay far away from home brew kit-bashes and designs.

Anyway, the star field looks cool. Is it 2D or can you pan around the model?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Knight3000 In reply to LouieD0g [2014-01-17 01:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Actually she`s a PhaseΒ II Constitution class.

Cool warp effect

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LouieD0g In reply to Knight3000 [2014-01-18 13:57:06 +0000 UTC]

That makes sense! I've been staring more and more at photos of the studio models (and reading about their history) and the amount of detail and background involved with the ships (up until the Abrams films) is just mind blowing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Knight3000 In reply to LouieD0g [2014-01-18 21:19:05 +0000 UTC]

Its simple with the Original series and movies

The originalΒ series was a Constitution class and the movies was a Constitution Refit.

The Abrams movies, I`m not sure if the Enterprise is classified as a Constitution class.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LouieD0g In reply to Knight3000 [2014-01-19 00:50:58 +0000 UTC]

I was speaking of the real world design of the filming models (and their history). Changes made to the TMP model's paint after TMP, differences between pilot and series models for TOS, etc.Β 



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Knight3000 In reply to LouieD0g [2014-01-19 00:57:01 +0000 UTC]

Ahh yes there were 3 models in the original which were mostly the bridge dome sensor dish and nacelle covers fore and aft.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LouieD0g In reply to Knight3000 [2014-01-19 01:16:05 +0000 UTC]

I think you are confusing my interest with a debate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Knight3000 In reply to LouieD0g [2014-01-19 03:13:07 +0000 UTC]

I`m sorry about that. I didn't mean to do that. The animation is very good.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thefooltouchstone In reply to LouieD0g [2013-06-02 12:32:53 +0000 UTC]

Well, there is plenty of canon Trek worth steering clear of, for sure

Thanks! The field is 2D.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0