Comments: 105
Toarcian [2015-04-11 15:17:44 +0000 UTC]
yeah the giganotosaurus was way oversized
but if you ask me . . .
G-caroline vs T-rex = Tie = 50%50
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrTriangleWorld [2014-11-25 19:26:26 +0000 UTC]
What's done is done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Richtofen666 [2014-03-09 07:48:55 +0000 UTC]
There should have been a boss battle between the Giganoto and the unorthodox team of Regina and the T-Rex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Richtofen666 [2015-03-04 04:09:32 +0000 UTC]
That's a really cool idea!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MegaSpinosaur [2013-04-08 04:44:04 +0000 UTC]
I think the main reason why the Giganotosaurus was so big in the game may have been that it was possibly mutated. Because even a smart guy like me knows that a real Giganotosaurus couldn't reach a size like that, so it was obviously mutated to that size.
Giganotosaurus may be bigger than T-Rex, but not monstrously big.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dualhydra [2013-01-12 22:45:30 +0000 UTC]
the giganotosaurus is larger than a t-rex
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
carrot25 [2012-09-18 02:57:56 +0000 UTC]
The size of Giganotosaurus in Dino Crisis 2 was so exagerrated, about nearly twice bigger than T-rex. Maybe it mutated during the time travel from Cretaceous era to the Dino crisis 2 era. Not only giganotosaurus, but also other dinos mutated and became stronger because of this effect
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to carrot25 [2012-09-21 04:49:27 +0000 UTC]
I think they only want to provoke more fear shit in the game, soy they exagerrated the size of the Giganotosaurus to make him more scaring than the Rex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SameerPrehistorica [2012-09-03 04:03:29 +0000 UTC]
I agree that T-Rex should have won the fight versus the Giganotosaurus in Dino Crisis 2.It is one of my favorite games.I loved it.From that game only,i came to know about Giganotosaurus.They increased its size for no reason.I believed it was true that time.I was like..what the hell.How a theropod can be 25 feet tall or so.When i draw it in a notebook,i did the same way which was a mistake.In that game,it grabs T.Rex in its mouth and throws in a corner.What a joke.I mean,no theropod ever can be that size.Then i read about the actual size and i deleted the drawing i made before.Giga is only slightly heavier.It may have the longest skull of any theropod,but T.Rex has robust skull with deadly teeth.T.Rex can beat it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2012-09-21 04:46:32 +0000 UTC]
Of course the T-Rex can kick Giga ass, I think they over exagerrated the size of Giga because they maybe think like: "yeah if we kill the Rex, the most powerful dinosaur in the island, the gamer will scare the shit out of him" and so yeah, they create this Giga-Zilla for the reason of giving more fear to the game.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren [2012-09-02 04:40:52 +0000 UTC]
Nope, even in the fossil records Giganotosaurus wold win, Tyrannosaurus's jaws are nothing to the claws and the size of the Giganotosaurus. Well at lest I study my Dinos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-21 04:47:32 +0000 UTC]
I think they're both bad asses, but I'm on the side o the T-Rex. And I read that T-Rex claws are more powerful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-21 13:58:37 +0000 UTC]
small useless arm remember.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-21 14:35:56 +0000 UTC]
But Giga's arms were small too. Also, the T-Rex has a better vision and a bigger brain
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-21 21:07:51 +0000 UTC]
T-Rex's arm are as long as a humans arms and Giga's arms are almost as long as an ravage adult, baby lang and yes I know for a fact that T-Rex has a better vision and a bigger brain. But What dos Giganotosaurus, and Tyrannosaurus eat, and they mater by there size.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-22 05:42:17 +0000 UTC]
Gigas only an hunt those big dinosaurs because he hunt in herd. Also scientists agree that the T-Rex has a powerful bite than Giga. Giga is bigger than T-Rex, but I don't think that stronger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-22 14:24:01 +0000 UTC]
That is true but that T-Rex has a more powerful bite than Giga. But as a Carnosaruia, Giganotosaurus is Vary strong in the arms and neck, and also his teeth are designed to make Horrifying cuts that can leave a lot of damage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-25 13:27:43 +0000 UTC]
You're right. But come on, in Dino Crisis, they created a Gigazilla monster XD and treat the T-Rex like a piece of shit. Also, as same as the Spinosaurus, Giga get his fame to be one of the rivals of the T-Rex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-25 13:57:42 +0000 UTC]
Are you serious... video games and movies. It looks like they are rotting peoples minds. Video games don't count.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-25 17:39:32 +0000 UTC]
In the movies and videogames they're trying to make a monster more powerful than T-Rex. That's the main reason, to scare the watchers with a dinosaur who can defeat the T-Rex in a esy way, and a lot of people believe that what show in movie or videogames is true. Honestly I think T-Rex can beat Giga, but also Giga can beat T-Rex too, but with a less percent of probabilities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-25 22:29:58 +0000 UTC]
The last part you sad is were I'm trying to go with as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-26 03:41:42 +0000 UTC]
The part that says that both dinosaurs can defeat each other?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-26 04:50:54 +0000 UTC]
About right, yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheOzzex In reply to Lizren [2012-09-26 15:36:19 +0000 UTC]
So in that case, we are okay I think xd
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to TheOzzex [2012-09-26 23:46:27 +0000 UTC]
Yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZealRaegus In reply to Lizren [2012-09-09 06:40:22 +0000 UTC]
LOL. You're stupidity is very high bro. I hope you realize that there isn't even fossil records that Giga and T.Rex ever fought. you're a moron dude. You don't study dinosaurs, if you did, you'd know T.Rex wins.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Lizren In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-09 14:11:45 +0000 UTC]
No Giga and T-Rex were on different land masses and I f-----g know they never fought, like I wouldn't know that you A$$.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Lizren [2012-09-09 20:20:28 +0000 UTC]
Then why would you even say in the fossil records that Giga would win when they never met? Explain that. >->
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-09 20:44:51 +0000 UTC]
I know they never met and Giganotosaurus fossil records are suggested and studied by scientists that In a fight between it and T-Rex, Giganotosaurus wold be victor, even if it's in a stupid game.
You need to know size, wight, strengths and weakness of the Animal. And also haw old are you, do you read and are you even in school?
And yes I do f-----g study.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Lizren [2012-09-09 23:43:23 +0000 UTC]
Wow. You really don't know anything bro. I'm in college right now that's all the information you need to know about me. I don't bluntly give out my name, phone number, social security number out like an idiot.
And no, that's the exact opposite of what I've heard from others. The EXACT opposite. How about you really do your studying dude? If you know that scientists have studied over both of them, T.Rex was the victor. There are two documentary shows on youtube that you can look up, but you're probably not going to like the results from both of them.
I know for a fact that size has very little to do when it comes to T.Rex facing Giganotosaurus. Being a foot longer will not help Giga out in a fight. Yes, the most complete specimen of Giganotosaurus carilloni was exactly 43 ft long and 13 ft tall at the hips. Sue the T.Rex was 42 ft long and 13 ft tall at the hips along with the s-curved neck lifting the head up at 14 ft tall.
Strengths and weaknesses, I already know and I can already tell you that T.Rex has more strengths than Giga.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lizren In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-09 23:47:31 +0000 UTC]
You piss me out... were done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Lizren [2012-09-09 23:48:32 +0000 UTC]
Of course I pissed you off. Because you really can't handle the truth. >-> That's the reason. You know I'm right and you are wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Saberrex [2012-06-14 14:38:07 +0000 UTC]
if these two combatants were ever to truly meet, there would be no closer matchup. each is meant to kill with one bite and both are around the same size. 51/49; that's how close it would be. as for whom would win... i'll leave it to your imagination.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-09 06:41:35 +0000 UTC]
T.Rex has the higher chance of making the first strike, due to having binocular vision/forward-facing eyes. Giganotosaurus doesn't have this feature.
T.Rex would win the day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-09 14:34:35 +0000 UTC]
yes, but other than that, it is the most evenly matched battle that ever could be; 51/49.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-09 23:49:24 +0000 UTC]
Eh. I wouldn't consider it to be 51/49....more like 55/45. T.Rex has a lot of advantages that triumph over the primitive Giganotosaurus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-10 03:04:31 +0000 UTC]
still, their fire power and stamina are nearly equal. both are built to kill with just one bite. it would be over quickly. very quickly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-10 09:07:59 +0000 UTC]
That is something that a good case might be needed for...
Honestly, one bite from Giga is really....eh....suspicious. If we had skin from T.Rex, I would hope that we could find how thick its skin is. I'm sure it's as thick as an elephants or a little more, but it would be interesting.
Giga's teeth are good for slicing. T.Rex's teeth are good for slicing and crunching.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-10 16:07:50 +0000 UTC]
too true, but overall, despite this, they are quite evenly matched either way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-10 21:14:07 +0000 UTC]
Not really....Only reason I say this, is because T.Rex has a higher intellect than Giga. Being smarter than your opponent has a lot of advantages.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-10 21:25:04 +0000 UTC]
of course. brains beats brawn in any fight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-11 07:19:34 +0000 UTC]
Brains is helpful, but brawn is where T.Rex has the advantage in that too. When it comes to who can use their head, its T.Rex. There are few predators with a hard head and T.Rex delivers this. Even with being able to knock over Giga with a swing of his massive head, T.Rex's legs are as equally powerful. After all, to counter all that heavy gear T.Rex carried, T.Rex's legs weighed one ton each! That's a lot of muscle put into the predator. It was arguably fast for its size, running up to speeds of 15-20mph along with strides of over 15 ft in one step. T.Rex could knock Giga over easily. Giga's skull design, wouldn't allow it to use its skull. It would more than likely end up fracturing the structure or create a crack in the head bone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-11 17:07:38 +0000 UTC]
Actually T. rex is faster than that. if you look at the legs, you'll see they are comparable to an ornithomimid. indeed, when Othniel marsh discovered the solitary leg bones of Tyrannosaurus, he thought they belonged to a species of Ornithomimid. recent tests also prove that an adult was easily capable of 25 mph, while young rexes could move slightly faster than ornithomimids. it is built for speed and endurance. Giganotosaurus may be faster (able to run 31 mph) but it has none of Tyrannosaurus' stamina. the carnosaur's large skull is also weaker in bite, but it can withstand 6 tons of vertical stress before shattering. its jaws are used like an axe. it slams into the intended victim with that upper jaw and delivers a killing blow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-11 18:15:20 +0000 UTC]
That's completely wrong on how Giga attacks my friend. Giga's biteforce is stronger than that of a lion's to my knowledge. You're also getting that confused greatly with Allosaurus. Allosaurus was the one that Robert Bakker proposed that it used its head like a hatchet, opening its jaws widely and swinging its skull down to let the upper teeth rip and tear into the victim.
And that' incorrect on Giga being faster. If you actually look at the femur to tibia difference, you will see that the femur is longer than the tibia. Femur to tibia ratio translates to speed. The tibia should be longer than the femur, but that's the exact opposite for Giga. The femur/thigh bone is longer, making its stride much shorter compared to T.Rex.
Now, I'm not going to say T.Rex CAN'T, but it seems a little strange to me that T.Rex could run at speeds of 25 mph. I do know for a fact that there was a test that one of the paleontologist colleagues did through 3d imaging and using an elephants leg movement to study over. The results were that it couldn't run at that speed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to ZealRaegus [2012-09-12 00:48:16 +0000 UTC]
ah, but you forget, its that tail that helps. elephants do not have the big sturdy tails Tyrannosaurids have, nor the long birdlike legs, and that tail muscle, the caudofemoralis, allows for a greater release of energy than one would expect. Tyrannosaurids and abelisaurids (particularly carnotaurus) both have especially big caudofemoralises. it allows theropod dinosaurs to be relatively faster than mammals scaled to similar size.
as for Giga, i may have have gotten his biting method wrong for a moment, but i am not wrong about allosaurus. Carnotaurus also seems to have evolved this biting strategy too, only much faster. it explains why the skulls of both are weak, yet strong vertically. and speed is more of a short chase for Giga. he doesn't keep it up very long, but he can go somewhat faster so says biomechanics models. Tyrannosaurus does have the edge though. no doubt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZealRaegus In reply to Saberrex [2012-09-12 07:00:53 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh yes. I had forgotten about the rather large caudofemoralises. The Great Robert Bakker proposed this and many paleontologists agree. He's a ridiculously smart man and knows paleontology like the back of his hand! If my memory serves correct, he was the first paleontologist to ever propose that dinosaurs were warm-blooded instead of being cold-blooded in one of his early books in the 80s I believe.
Yeah, it was Allosaurus. Giganotosaurus towards what I've read is that's bite was more lethal than Allosaurus if it actually "bit" down on prey. Since the Allosaurus has the feeding method that Bob Bakker proposed, it sounds pretty logic in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>