HOME | DD
tigaer β Trilith - Animation
Published: 2007-06-15 19:15:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 6427; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
The Original Painting: [link]YOUTUBE
[link]
FULL DOWNLOAD
HQ Trilith Animation - 720px wide - Quicktime Movie - 20mb :: [link]
Complete Demoreel - 720px wide - Quicktime Movie - 70mb :: [link]
check here for more info & stuff: [link]
big thx to =pebcak for the webspace.
Happy Viewing...
Related content
Comments: 30
Echt cool!
Einfach nur schΓΆn!
Das mit den VΓΆgeln war noch ne gute Idee!
π: 0 β©: 1
es is weit entfernt davon perfekt zu sein. aber... wie du siehst sind es die kleinen details die solche dinge glaubwΓΌrdiger erscheinen lassen. wie eben die vΓΆgel.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sweet. I had to do something along the same lines recently for my After Effects class.
π: 0 β©: 0
Whoa! I would love to know how you did this! Then I might stand a chance of doing something similar with my fantasy world...
π: 0 β©: 1
a lot of work with photoshop 3dsmax and after effects. for just a few seconds of moving pictures.
π: 0 β©: 1
eh, I am too lazy at the moment for that.
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome job!
Put on a little music on it and I love it even more.
π: 0 β©: 0
Β‘Nice work! I just have a suggestion/thought for you. I might be wrong, and I'll be interested in knowing if you already tried it, and how it worked: I think that you could get much more depth by placing the back layers of the matte much further away (eg. the sky further from the mountain range, and several layers of mountains -a couple maybe-). Right now it still feels a bit too flat to me.
π: 0 β©: 1
that would have meant to extend the painting elements a lot more. i didn't have had the time and ambition to do so. since i though the parallax effect worked good enough for me. but yes it would have been a bit more depth if i would have used a farther distance between the layers.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean with "extend the painting elements"? You mean in size, resolution, abundance of elements...?
Hope I'm not bothering you with my questions. I'm a digital compositor and director of my own little films, and even though I haven't directly worked on complex 3D matte paintings, i'm highly interested in that aspect of the work for future development.
π: 0 β©: 1
well... with the parallax going on in the background... it reveals parts of the painting that are not exactly worked out in the painting itself. means when the cam is moving and the front mountain moves to the left because of the perspective shift... the background space behind the mountain becomes visible. since the painting is always done in 2d it sometimes happens that some parts are not 'filled'... so you get a hole in the animation once the front mountain starts to move to the left. of course you need to fill these spaces then. sometimes that process is time consuming. and i admit i was a little bit lazy this time. 
π: 0 β©: 1
Ok, I understand. Thanks for taking the time to explain. So you did the painting first as a pure 2D, and then decomposed it in layers for 3D. It works perfectly well that way then, no need for more extra work.
I thought you had planned it as a 3D paint from the beginning, and that way you could make rough sketches of the layers and then know (after cam movement is done) what parts of each layer need to be worked. Ever thought about doing that, or you just make your 2D paints and then have some fun quickly putting them in 3D?
π: 0 β©: 0
I tend to agree with the others who think the images are beautiful but the animation doesn't really add to it.. The whole thing does look awesome though
π: 0 β©: 0
really cool man, you should collaborate with some other animators and do a short film or something.
really impressive.
π: 0 β©: 0
Ich hab es auf der Mainpage bei den neuen Deviations gesehen \o/
Wollt's nur mal erwΓ€hnen ^^
Ansonsten... finde den Effekt am Ende zwar genial, aber kann mit dem Video selbst nicht so viel anfangen... mit dem Bild selber schon mehr, weswegen es demnΓ€chst dann auch den Comment gibt ^^
Β·Β· |D|
π: 0 β©: 1
naja is eigentl auch nur fΓΌr ne spezielle bewerbung gemacht. klar is es nix weltbewegendes... 
π: 0 β©: 0
No point making an animation which consists of a few layers moving over eachother, doesn't seem to make sense to me.
The piece is amazing though!
π: 0 β©: 1
no point in making movies at all then
π: 0 β©: 1
If there is a message, yes, but we get the message through the image in this case. Doesnt matter anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
sure there's no message in my videos but for ME alone it is something special to see the static painting moving around. it makes the impression much more believable.
π: 0 β©: 0
very nice, i love your style. keep up the good work.
π: 0 β©: 0