Comments: 5
Fitz-Chivalry [2012-06-06 16:51:40 +0000 UTC]
Hey, you should probably actually refer to the original photos in your descriptions. Blepharopsis is probably famous enough for you to not really need to, but at the same time, just to show the original work and comparison.
It's pretty freaking stunning. Really amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fitz-Chivalry In reply to tiggytattoos [2012-06-12 03:07:56 +0000 UTC]
I know the chameleon is also from Blepharopsis. But I don't know about the peacock. I have seen the photo before, but it doesn't seem to be his normal subject matter, so I think it's a different artist. *shrug*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0