Comments: 16
atzalan [2011-04-24 21:04:32 +0000 UTC]
I like to know -if it is possible- how do you get the shading on White Queen's close-up at panel 4 of the page?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TimTownsend In reply to atzalan [2011-04-25 16:31:38 +0000 UTC]
Dot pattern over-lay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
atzalan In reply to TimTownsend [2011-04-26 05:26:29 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a Lot! It's good to be heard (or read) by a professional. Much appreciated!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DIchigo [2011-04-21 00:18:50 +0000 UTC]
So gorgeous. I wish I could add something more, but I can't think of much else. Thanks for sharing this, it's always awesome to see in progress art and inks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thaBEAST [2011-04-16 23:32:00 +0000 UTC]
after going through all these BACHALO x TOWNSEND B&W pages I really want to see a B&W book/series - it's just so strong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndrewTunney [2011-04-14 23:28:42 +0000 UTC]
I would love to see you two go indie and do a full book in black and white with zip tone. Or do a Tomb Of Dracula book for Marvel in the same style... you'd own the shit out of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SpiderGuile [2011-04-14 22:00:13 +0000 UTC]
neat!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JohntheMurray [2011-04-14 16:49:04 +0000 UTC]
That long pannel with Storm is just ...AMAZING!!! cant wait to see this colored
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ToddMoniz [2011-04-14 16:31:56 +0000 UTC]
As can be expected.... really sharp/clean ink work, very impressive!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrenGun [2011-04-14 15:46:36 +0000 UTC]
loojs really great!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TomParrish [2011-04-14 14:15:36 +0000 UTC]
As ever Tim beautiful work, you and Chris make a fantastic team! Do you use traditional zip-a-tone sheets on his pages or is a post production texture you add? (stupid question I'm sure as I know the rest of your work is trad, I just wasn't sure whether can even still get tone sheets anymore!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TimTownsend In reply to TomParrish [2011-04-14 15:58:49 +0000 UTC]
Not stupid at all, actually. Id prefer to use tradition zip (I absolutely love the stuff) but its scarcity is prohibitive. Chris actually does it on his end by inking that portion of the image very roughly, scanning it, laying down a layer of dot tone, printing it out on regular paper, and then pasting on the original art board. Im a neat freak and it looks kind of sloppy on the original. Its also a big headache to work around but it is a big time saver in the end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomParrish In reply to TimTownsend [2011-04-14 18:57:27 +0000 UTC]
That's really interesting - I wouldn't have thought of Chris having gone for the collage style approach at his end with self-printed tone. I guess that so long as you know how you want it to look when finished or when aiming for a specific look it's just a case of trying to find the most efficient workflow to make it happen. It certainly would make the originals exciting to look at I'm sure, as one of the problems inherent with any form of digital post work (...especially digital inking itself - less said about that for the moment the better) is that it's simply not a part of the original art, and so the original never feels complete, particularly at the point of resale!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomParrish In reply to TimTownsend [2011-04-14 20:26:03 +0000 UTC]
Amen man! There's nothing quite like the look and feel of a finished artboard in your hands - that's so great that you guys are on the same page; but then again I guess that's why you make such a good team!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cruzarte In reply to TomParrish [2011-04-18 14:41:05 +0000 UTC]
That's damn right! There's nothing like a neat complete piece of traditional artwork.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0