HOME | DD

Tobi-the-grim-meeper β€” Unpopular Opinion

Published: 2011-07-17 01:28:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 2541; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description I don't. Because I'm a cynical bastard.

You don't know someone until you get to know them. Love is a proclamation of trust and devotion. Loving someone takes faith and courage, and a willingness to give a part of yourself to another. Loving someone you just met isn't magical. It's stupid. //unpopular opinion.
Related content
Comments: 41

Cianna200 [2019-07-01 14:02:21 +0000 UTC]

There is no such thing as love at first sight, there is only ATTRACTION at first sight

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MsCreative309 [2019-04-06 02:27:40 +0000 UTC]

"Love at first sight doesn’t exist. Love takes time and love takes work at the very least you have to know the other person and you literally have no idea who or what I am."Β 

~Garnet (Steven Universe)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thelittlecupcakepro [2017-08-16 02:52:53 +0000 UTC]

Same. You need to know a person before you fall in love with them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

QuirkyCuriousBex [2017-05-21 23:39:44 +0000 UTC]

I find (and this is just me) that people who believe in love at first sight confuse love with sexual attraction. Two completely different things.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LunarLeaf100 [2017-04-09 13:22:06 +0000 UTC]

my sister believes in that garbage, and i hate it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PollykRose34 [2016-10-14 01:17:44 +0000 UTC]

I only felt love at first sight once on my life, that was when i saw my mom on first seconds of my birth
Then, i never felt love at first sight again

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Supercoco142 [2016-08-08 09:47:16 +0000 UTC]

This "love at first sight" is just being attracted to someone. Attraction does NOT equal love.

I think you two should be friends for AT THE VERY, VERY LEAST a month until you two hook up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ViktoriaMagrey In reply to Supercoco142 [2016-08-30 16:14:28 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KappaGecko [2015-12-17 20:09:45 +0000 UTC]

Love takes time.
Because to love someone, you need to actually know them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

glovannas In reply to KappaGecko [2016-02-27 17:00:23 +0000 UTC]

Agreed so much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlazingCourageXx [2015-12-15 02:17:13 +0000 UTC]

Using btw

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlazingCourageXx [2015-12-15 01:07:50 +0000 UTC]

It's more like infatuation at first sight, some relationships start that way and slowly develop into love..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Iki-Fujisaka [2015-12-14 15:13:35 +0000 UTC]

Rarity and Spike >_>

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KessieLou In reply to Iki-Fujisaka [2016-08-05 08:27:30 +0000 UTC]

Donatello & April (2012 TMNT).

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

MarioSonicPeace [2015-12-06 21:35:31 +0000 UTC]

I have to agree.... :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugilita In reply to MarioSonicPeace [2015-12-28 19:20:15 +0000 UTC]

Β Β  *cough* 2012 Don's crush on April *cough*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarioSonicPeace In reply to sugilita [2015-12-28 20:07:31 +0000 UTC]

XD

Lol, true.
Although at least he got to know her.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

n-ihiIism [2015-10-11 17:40:36 +0000 UTC]

preach

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RockmanGurl [2015-09-19 19:02:56 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. In fact, the best loves I find are the ones that are the most unexpected and take both people by surprise, because they didn't THINK they'd fall in love with each other.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nayanfirecat [2014-11-09 23:06:52 +0000 UTC]

"Love" is something that develops over time by trusting and respecting another person. when people say "love at first sight" they usually mean thinking "dayuum they hot as hell" aka lust.

COME AT ME HATERS IDFC

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

EarthAngel87 [2014-10-14 00:26:11 +0000 UTC]

I agree. You can become infatuated at first sight, but real love takes time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chivi-chivik [2014-09-21 19:07:43 +0000 UTC]

I don't because the oh-so-called "love at first sight" is INFATUATION, and infatuation is not love.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Quietrium [2014-07-14 18:53:16 +0000 UTC]

How I've always felt about 'love at first sight' -Β  Β Β 
THIS IS BRILLIANT!Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aurora8911 [2014-06-11 13:39:09 +0000 UTC]

THIS.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Corvus-the-Snark [2014-04-07 16:30:28 +0000 UTC]

indeed, love at first sight does not exist outside of the movies, and even then there are plenty of movies that go out of there way to demonstrate how ridiculous love at first sight (Possible irony, most of them are made by Disney)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CanineHuntress [2014-03-22 00:32:36 +0000 UTC]

I kind of agree with it. It tells us that appearance is more important than their will and selfless behavior.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ass-pen [2014-02-11 19:40:36 +0000 UTC]

definetely LUST at first sight, but no not love.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LongLiveAnarchy [2013-07-15 11:04:57 +0000 UTC]

I agree!
I always believed that when you "love someone at first sight",
all they really did, was capture your attention.
NOT your love.

I'm glad someone understands.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Neoglitch17 [2013-04-02 23:33:48 +0000 UTC]

Your opinion may be unpopular, but at least to me, it looks like the most congruent with reality.

Faved

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SparxPunx [2012-08-27 17:30:51 +0000 UTC]

hahaha its not love at first sight but lust at first sight ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bjarru [2012-03-11 19:01:32 +0000 UTC]

True !
I just... you're right!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Capital-Zero [2012-03-07 23:39:19 +0000 UTC]

Me either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LauNachtyr [2011-09-24 05:46:08 +0000 UTC]

Fully agree.

Not to say that love can't be magical, but you have to get to know someone for the magic to spark.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarknessTare [2011-09-17 18:13:12 +0000 UTC]

Love at first sight only judges the appearrance, which is rude. Like saying (ex.) "Jeanette, you're hot.. Wanna get married?"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Polar-Alli17 [2011-08-07 21:30:14 +0000 UTC]

Thats so true.
You grow to love someone through time, not just by some random sight. -__-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SarcasmAndWit [2011-07-18 00:28:08 +0000 UTC]

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thank you, you are the first sane person I have heard since my theatre group did Romeo and Juliet ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tobi-the-grim-meeper In reply to SarcasmAndWit [2011-07-18 00:43:38 +0000 UTC]

Romeo and Juliet.
Ugh, that novel. Ugh, that play.
Out of all the literature Shakespeare wrote, THAT one is the most famous, and THAT one is the worst. Plot-wise, it was, in my opinion, very close to Twilight in literary value. I love Shakespeares work. Except that one.

Thanks for the comment, I feel your pain.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 2

T-mack56 In reply to Tobi-the-grim-meeper [2015-12-05 12:07:21 +0000 UTC]

Well to Shakespeare's defense that was written around the time when that kind of behavior was considered acceptable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SarcasmAndWit In reply to Tobi-the-grim-meeper [2011-07-18 01:52:53 +0000 UTC]

Finaly, a sane Shakespeare lover.

My favorite was Much Ado About Nothing or Hamlet, what was your's???

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tobi-the-grim-meeper In reply to SarcasmAndWit [2011-07-18 03:08:44 +0000 UTC]

Mmm. I actually liked Macbeth even though the main character was a tard.
Hamlet was definitely a favorite, also.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SarcasmAndWit In reply to Tobi-the-grim-meeper [2011-07-19 00:32:05 +0000 UTC]

out, out damn spot!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0