Comments: 4
BaseDeltaZero [2015-04-08 02:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Your shields appear to be a lot weaker than your weapons. Four orders of magnitude weaker, in fact, but your description doesn't really imply they're worthless against all but the weakest weapons...
Also, I think your acceleration might be too low. Your mass is 75,000,000 tons. Presuming they're metric tons, that's 7.5E10 kilograms.
Thrust from all the main engines put together is 7.2E18 watts, and a watt is a kilogram * meter / second
So take 7.2E18 kilogram * meter / second against 7.5E10 kilograms and dividing out the kilograms gives us an acceleration of 9.6E7 meters/second That's almost 10 *million* Gs...
At least I think it is. Converting acceleration to joules is hard, yo...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tounushi In reply to BaseDeltaZero [2015-04-09 17:42:55 +0000 UTC]
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLD stats here, most likely written in the wee hours of morn.
Trying to rework the entire fleet.
And my idea for shields has been to redirect more than try to stop them, at least with the primary. The "traditional" shield is a last resort before hull armor.
I've had this idea of the ships pinching a bit of space to mess with the trajectory of beams and projectiles so they'd either be shredded by the forces involved or have the trajectory moved just enough to completely miss the ship. And since these pinch areas can be stacked (depending on the power of the ship), it'd provide great defence against heavy weapons.
The downside would be the relative ease of overwhelming the system with multiple attackers.
The mass has been a tough one for me. I can't even remember the formula I calculated it. Simplified volume times a fraction of the density of iron, IIRC. A ship's volume is made up of varying elements, most of them metals, liquids, gasses and carbon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bbtomahawk12 [2013-01-16 15:56:10 +0000 UTC]
Love it
it looks like the star destroyer from star wars
👍: 0 ⏩: 1