HOME | DD

Description
Heheh, to be honest, I have fun working with Pokemons again!

This sprite was requested by

This is Gardenia, a character that doesn't belongs to me, so no story or stats from my part.

Well, this was an easy one, a simple but cool concept, but obviously the Tox had to make it difficult... What I did this time? Well, I didn't wanted to just use one simple Gardevoir sprite and then edit it, so I used two (one from Platinum, and the other from BW). But because I was still not happy, I decided to "improve" the shading (but it still not so diferent...Damn, now that I think about it, I'm a packet...). But well, enought of that. I also give her visible legs because I didn't want the sprite to look that simple, and well, they look good, right? R-right?

And yeah, if you are wondering what are those "random" pixel in the dress, those are meant to be the "delineation" of the leg, yeah it's not that good, I know, but I think it helps a little bit to distinguish the "depth" of the legs, because, if you didn't noticed (I will not be surprised if you didn't...) the most exposed leg it's supposed to be "on front" and the other is behind. Uff... I need to practice more with perspectives...

Description
Heheh, to be honest, I have fun working with Pokemons again!

This sprite was requested by

This is Gardenia, a character that doesn't belongs to me, so no story or stats from my part.

Well, this was an easy one, a simple but cool concept, but obviously the Tox had to make it difficult... What I did this time? Well, I didn't wanted to just use one simple Gardevoir sprite and then edit it, so I used two (one from Platinum, and the other from BW). But because I was still not happy, I decided to "improve" the shading (but it still not so diferent...Damn, now that I think about it, I'm a packet...). But well, enought of that. I also give her visible legs because I didn't want the sprite to look that simple, and well, they look good, right? R-right?

And yeah, if you are wondering what are those "random" pixel in the dress, those are meant to be the "delineation" of the leg, yeah it's not that good, I know, but I think it helps a little bit to distinguish the "depth" of the legs, because, if you didn't noticed (I will not be surprised if you didn't...) the most exposed leg it's supposed to be "on front" and the other is behind. Uff... I need to practice more with perspectives...