Comments: 31
MannWulf [2008-10-10 21:43:23 +0000 UTC]
ok, in the worst thing on the movie was the name of BRAWL, they say "devastator"
AND YOU MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ACdraw In reply to MannWulf [2008-10-25 19:45:18 +0000 UTC]
Calm down.
IT'S A STAGE NAME.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MannWulf In reply to ACdraw [2008-10-27 13:56:59 +0000 UTC]
yes, i know.... but it's unacceptable.... and now they wanna make Devastator in the second movie, but how they will build devastator without Bonecrusher if he was killed by optimus in the first movie, and if brawl was devastator itself? how? HOWWWWWW?????
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ACdraw In reply to MannWulf [2008-10-27 16:32:34 +0000 UTC]
Like I said before, calm down.
A name-change is far from the worst thing to happen in Transformers.
And that's precisely what they could do: either use a different name or not mention it in the movie (Scorponok is vastly different to his G1 character and his name was never stated in any form during the film).
As for Bonecrusher, it's more than likely that he isn't a combiner in the movie series (and apparently Bonecrusher will not be resurrected for the sequel).
Apparently, 7 new characters (to the movies) will be forming Devastator.
The original Brawl himself was a combiner, but in the movie he was merely a single Decepticon troop.
On another note, two Constructicons have appeared in Transformers Animated, yet they don't combine yet.
With that in mind a name change is far from unacceptable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MannWulf In reply to ACdraw [2008-10-27 17:05:28 +0000 UTC]
that's what i mean, when devastator is formed by 7 constructicons? they were just 6!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ACdraw In reply to MannWulf [2008-10-27 18:49:21 +0000 UTC]
And? I don't see how it's such a big deal.
If anything it will only be to make Devastator seem larger (like how Optimus Prime wasn't a cab-over-engine truck so he could be taller).
Besides, this is all just speculation at the moment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MannWulf In reply to ACdraw [2008-10-28 14:48:53 +0000 UTC]
yeh, sure.... and you're right, seven constructicons may form a larger devastator... interesting...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoArtisticBone In reply to MannWulf [2011-03-02 04:59:27 +0000 UTC]
They changed the name and forgot to switch the name on the credits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ACdraw [2008-10-06 02:52:38 +0000 UTC]
I seriously love the idea of Devastator being an alternate (stage) name for Brawl and not his true name.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dogbite12 [2008-08-28 05:08:11 +0000 UTC]
Oh, very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ninjha [2008-08-21 19:11:38 +0000 UTC]
too amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
0ArmoredSoul0 [2008-08-18 05:01:37 +0000 UTC]
It's BRAWL!!!
Assholes...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SonRay [2008-08-15 21:58:46 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome, but the mistake in the last panel is quite bothersome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SonRay In reply to kerfufflecolor [2008-08-16 22:44:27 +0000 UTC]
The reflection of the tank in his optics. Its not the right model of tank, thats all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
littleiron In reply to SonRay [2008-08-17 12:50:07 +0000 UTC]
Well, Brawl's alt mode is actually a modified M-1 tank....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SonRay In reply to littleiron [2008-08-18 00:09:04 +0000 UTC]
yep, but the one in the pic isnt modified.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
littleiron In reply to SonRay [2008-08-19 14:31:08 +0000 UTC]
Well, I assumed Brawl had made the modifications himself basing on the normal M-1s XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shirozora [2008-08-15 07:47:42 +0000 UTC]
Win. Hands down.
Go movieverse!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JZLobo [2008-08-15 04:09:36 +0000 UTC]
Alriiiight, my little brother's Mosaic has FINALLY been released! I'm so proud of you, bro.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TaintedTamer [2008-08-15 04:08:25 +0000 UTC]
Sweet! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Seiberwing [2008-08-15 03:48:47 +0000 UTC]
Ooh...
Very shiny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AnthonyPresley [2008-08-15 03:43:52 +0000 UTC]
good job on this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nikipinz [2008-08-15 03:43:28 +0000 UTC]
Ooooh, shiny. O.O *faves*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0