Comments: 72
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to ??? [2017-07-02 16:32:26 +0000 UTC]
He says in the comments sectional n of a super obvious dig at the carr et all paper
π: 0 β©: 1
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2017-07-17 06:04:41 +0000 UTC]
Why didn't you comment there? Why comment under an obvious parody of a dumb claims of a few scientists and dovahkiin
Also, that was a wildly speculative rendering of alanqa, based on your suggestion that it might have been something other than bumps or pseudo teeth.
I suggest reading descriptions.
π: 0 β©: 1
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2017-04-27 02:03:30 +0000 UTC]
I don't doubt they ate water stuff, they might have done pretty common even, weren't there a ton of rivers in hell creek
π: 0 β©: 1
ThatCoelurosaur [2017-04-03 01:16:41 +0000 UTC]
This entire paper was a fail. Why yes, the skull of a fully terrestrial land predator with great eyesight has similarities with the skull of an amphibious archosaur from an entirely different lineage. SURELY THE TWO HAD THE EXACT SAME HEAD FUNCTIONALITY AND LOOK!!!
π: 0 β©: 2
TheDubstepAddict In reply to ThatCoelurosaur [2017-04-22 22:08:58 +0000 UTC]
Just because they did overreact with the lips the rest wasn't a fail.
π: 0 β©: 1
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to ThatCoelurosaur [2017-04-03 05:01:20 +0000 UTC]
Obviously, this means they were semi aquatic predators converging on crocodiles
π: 0 β©: 1
ThatCoelurosaur In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-04-03 10:37:14 +0000 UTC]
Obviously. Let us set aside everything we know about tyrannosauridstyrannosaurid because of one, very poorly observed fossil.
π: 0 β©: 1
Rahonavis70m [2017-04-02 09:56:50 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful
π: 0 β©: 1
TheDerpasaur [2017-04-02 00:58:16 +0000 UTC]
axcur8t
π: 0 β©: 2
TheDerpasaur In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2017-04-29 00:11:10 +0000 UTC]
I'd imagine it can, I never thought of it hunting fish before.
π: 0 β©: 0
mrplcole [2017-04-01 20:36:00 +0000 UTC]
Β
π: 0 β©: 1
JurassicJacob [2017-04-01 17:53:16 +0000 UTC]
What do you think about this paper? I personally don't buy it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Corallianassa [2017-04-01 17:18:49 +0000 UTC]
Glorious.
π: 0 β©: 2
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to Corallianassa [2017-04-01 19:03:34 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, these revelations shine so much new light upon these amazing creatures
π: 0 β©: 1
Corallianassa In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-04-01 19:06:34 +0000 UTC]
Yes.
Did you hear about the study about the pelvic and shoulder anatomy of Brontosaurus? Apparently, it could not support it's weight on land, so it was aquatic!Β
π: 0 β©: 1
TrilobiteCannibal In reply to Corallianassa [2017-04-01 19:09:48 +0000 UTC]
So much convergence with plesiosaurs! It explains everything!
π: 0 β©: 1
Corallianassa In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-04-01 19:28:46 +0000 UTC]
Yes! They were apparently sister taxa (plesiosaurs and sauropodomorphs). Explains the long necks.
π: 0 β©: 1
xLeSpiderx [2017-04-01 17:11:19 +0000 UTC]
So much speculation based off of skin prints, poop and bones. Such science, much wow.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>