HOME | DD
TriteBristle β Heartstrings ch1/p2 - Mare meets mare
Published: 2012-07-08 00:28:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 73599; Favourites: 530; Downloads: 462
Redirect to original
Description
Next page: [link]Previous page: [link]
MLP:FiM is owned by Hasbro and , please don't sue me.
Related content
Comments: 111
I loved Lyra reaction and the way she looked so cute and perfect
π: 0 β©: 0
YES! Co-Second Best Pony Lyra for the win!
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh, man, I haven't played Pokemon Mystery Dungeon years.
π: 0 β©: 0
I thought she was a human since she questioned "what" Bon Bon is... that's quite interesting...Β
The only problem is, that note on the first page make my worry that You make them lesbian... I really hope I'm wrong...
π: 0 β©: 1
They will marry each other at some point too. The comic will unlikely to be made till that point (I'll be happy if I ever finish the next few chapters), but I'll hint to that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, You hinted it quite visible. But still... Β marry!?
That's against the nature of marriage and love itself!
π: 0 β©: 1
I would argue that marriage doesn't have any nature (as it's a made up convention).
And same-sex love is no different from mixed-sex love, both are pretty much just electrochemical reactions in people's (and talking cartoon horses') brains.
But I don't feel like arguing, so let's not. I'm fairly sure that we both have better things to do, so let's agree to disagree for now.
π: 0 β©: 1
Arguing isn't this what I want too, but I must straighten some things.Β
Firstly marriage isn't just made up convention. The form of it or the word itself maybe, but not core of it. In the essence it is the seal on the eternal bond between woman an men(wife and husband), with purpose to create new family(and therefore divorce is also against nature of marriage). The way of being married differ across the time but it's core is as old as human civilization intself. It always exist.
And this what are You talking about love is just feeling of love, but love is much more than juast a feeling. It's relationship.Β
But when You are about this very sciantific way of explain, tell me what for is love - from purely scientific point of view?
The answer is easy: reproduction and extension of species.
(Of course I don't say it's only that, but from purely scientific point of view it is so.)
Therefor it's obvious that "same-sex love" is a disorder. And most scientific research prove it. There's no scientific research that prove homosexuality is normal/natural(the only reasearches which tried failed(like trying to prove its genetics but the compatibility of sexual orientation of monozygotic twins, when one was homo, was NOT HIGHER than about 52%(and in next attempts even lower!) - if it really would be about genetics then compatibility in case of people with the same DNA should be 100%(at least about)), and they have lots of methodological errors - excluding them as truly scientific) or harmless(quite opposite - negative effects of homosexuality are widely proven, even some pro-LGTB organizations partially admit that).Β
Of course political correctness stronlgy forbid to tell that homosexuality is not normal, not natural or in any way unmoral or harmfull. But political correctness isn't the same what truth. And truth is this what counts.Β
Of course You can think whatever You want, but it doesn't change what science tell about homosexuality or what the truth is. No matter who of us is right the fact is: opinions don't change facts.Β
That was all I wanted to say about it now I can agree to just stop this discussion and as You say "agree to disagree".Β
(But still I hope I stimulate You to think over it again)
π: 0 β©: 1
Since you summed up your position on this matter, I'll do the same.
You seem to suggest that the problem mainly is that they cannot reproduce. Thus people who can't bear children shouldn't get married either (infertile, elderly, etc).
Look, the reproduction argument would have a slither of a point if there wouldn't be 7 billion people running around in an overpopulated earth. We aren't exactly in danger of extinction.
Let's say women marry each other. The newly formed family has at least one working uterus. There's quite a few ways to produce a child, e.g. sperm banks have been existed for decades now. There's also research for producing a fertilized egg from two eggs, see Kaguya-hime ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaguya_(β¦ ). (And if you try to deem these methods as "unnatural", I'll have to remind you that computers, smart phones, desks, chairs, cars, glasses, clothes, and most things that surround you are unnatural.)
Another thing some people like to throw around is the "lack of a role model". Which is incorrect in my opinion, because kids don't necessarily have to choose a role model from their own family, that is if they aren't living in an environment totally insulated from the world; thus if they need a masculine role model they can find them e.g. in pop culture. Even if a kid has mixed-sex parents, they don't always look at them as someone to aspire to (e.g. deadbeat father/mother).
Pretty much the same goes for two men, though they will have to opt for adoption, as they lack uteri.
So the bottom line is, it's not "unmoral" or "harmful" as you said. And even if it was "unnatural" (same-sex affection has been observed for at least 1500 species in nature), we also concluded that unnatural things aren't bad by definition. And on the final note, same-sex marriage has been legal for quite a few countries and US states for years now, and neither the world nor mixed-sex marriage hasn't come to end yet. How shocking.
Now that I wrote my own piece, I'll indeed stop arguing and just agree to disagree. If you wish to further this, I'll just respond with links I'll google up on this matter, so I suggest we don't waste each others' time.
π: 0 β©: 0
it's doctor hooves/lonely hooves all over again!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Here is your awnswer: You are a magical talking horse that has a glued horn on your head that is magical and you have hooves instead of hands ..... hands ..... hands (Those repeats of 'hands' where echos)
Β NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
π: 0 β©: 0
So that's how Lyra and Bon Bon first met. hmmm....
π: 0 β©: 0
Why do I keep getting flashbacks to that stupid MC playthrough I did with a long time ago?
π: 0 β©: 0
Pony Mystery Dungeon; Explorers of Friendship.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes because the Forest is so dangerousΒ honestly the ponies keep saying this but throughout the series we've seen ponies walking in and out alive! we could make a drinking game out of the number of times ponies walk into the forest saying how scary it it when really its just a bunch of trees and bushes and other animals they can handle
π: 0 β©: 1
I asume that everypony began understanding that it was not so Dangerous after the mane six went into there
π: 0 β©: 1
ahh, i suppose that makes sense but even in season 4 rarity states that she's still scared (and flutters too but of course flutters would be scared of any place that's dark, poor flutters)
π: 0 β©: 1
at least flutters aint scared of her own shadow anymore...
π: 0 β©: 0
No... its not so bad Trite ^^ I DO see the difference....but don't think so bad about your past work ^^ its still wonderfull XD
I still love coming back to the beginning and re-reading it all over again 
π: 0 β©: 0
That was my exact thoughts!
π: 0 β©: 0
Omg, I laughed harder than I should of.
π: 0 β©: 1
huh and I thought my jokes weren't that funny XD
π: 0 β©: 1
You need to look Celestia in the eye and tell her she is not a banana, Lyra is!
π: 0 β©: 1
SHE IS NOT THE TRUE BANNANA
π: 0 β©: 1
TROLLESTIA YOU BUCKER! GET OVER HERE AND I'LL FRIENDSHIP YOU TO THE MOON!! MWUAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 2
COTTON CANDY! GET OVER HERE! HELP FRIENDSHIP TROLLESTIA TO THE MOON! *grabs Twilight scepter* 3!2!1! FRIENDSHIPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Celstia: NUUUUUUUU!!!
LUNA: sis wtf are you doing here
π: 0 β©: 0
Wait. Β Lyra isn't a native Equestrian in this??
π: 0 β©: 1
Either that or a recently regenerated Time Pony. The change can cause some pretty bad amnesia.
π: 0 β©: 1
Always a risk with time/space travel.
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed it is. Regenerations can be botched as well. That's what happened to The War Chief, an enemy of The Doctor. Quite gruesome.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not familiar with the example.
π: 0 β©: 1
The War Chief's regeneration went wrong and he ended up badly deformed.
The War Chief
π: 0 β©: 1
ya know, you can just ignore things you think is weird, it is a fanfic
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>