HOME | DD

TThealer56 β€” And Just WHO Are You?

Published: 2007-05-16 04:01:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 376; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 30
Redirect to original
Description Several of these Seagull pics were taken while Alice was feeding the birds at Carrabelle Beach FL. One of the hazzards of running a motorhome for several weeks out is that you can't really controll the humidity, often times bread molds, and crackers get stale! We have a policy of saving bread, and feeding the birds where ever we go....

I thought this guy's face was a bit humorous, looking straight into the camera.........
Related content
Comments: 14

JocelyneR [2010-08-30 00:50:25 +0000 UTC]

This beautiful work has been featured here: [link] .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to JocelyneR [2010-08-30 03:05:52 +0000 UTC]

Oh my gosh! I forgot that was even in my gallery! I shot that with my old Sony Mavica!

Thanks so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JocelyneR In reply to TThealer56 [2010-09-02 03:12:36 +0000 UTC]

Aww, Bob, it is a beautiful shot, you did well with that camera!
You are so very welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to JocelyneR [2010-09-02 05:49:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JocelyneR [2009-09-07 23:58:59 +0000 UTC]

Awesome catch, beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to JocelyneR [2009-09-08 02:55:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, this is one I shot almost 2 years ago with an old Sony Mavica...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JocelyneR In reply to TThealer56 [2009-09-09 07:18:16 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure!
You did a pretty good work with this old camera...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to JocelyneR [2009-09-09 07:22:21 +0000 UTC]

The funny thing is, that was a $549 camera when I bought it. It had a whopping 1.3 Mp.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JocelyneR In reply to TThealer56 [2009-09-11 00:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is not bad for a 1.3 MP. I am using 2 cameras from the same brand, one with 3.1 Mp and the other one with 5.1 Mp. I don't really see the difference... But I am not very experimented, I must say.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to JocelyneR [2009-09-11 03:33:37 +0000 UTC]

For it's day it did pretty well. You won't see a difference until you look at the details.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JocelyneR In reply to TThealer56 [2009-09-12 03:57:58 +0000 UTC]

This is very true indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nyarlotep [2007-05-17 03:24:16 +0000 UTC]

This one is my personal fav from your seagull shots, I really like the composition... i only wish it would not be so pixelated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TThealer56 In reply to Nyarlotep [2007-05-17 04:24:02 +0000 UTC]

Hey! That a great idea you have! Just send me a check for about $700.00 U.S. and I'll be happy to buy a camera that will do that! Coooooool idea!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyarlotep In reply to TThealer56 [2007-05-17 04:30:56 +0000 UTC]

There is no need for expending so much money if you canΒ΄t afort it, I donΒ΄t have a dime to my name living with my mother and using her camera with a simple image program you could erase the noise from the image... look at this
[link]
I downloaded for free
You donΒ΄t have an idea how much noisy my photos are most of the times, and even more if I have to use the digital zoom, that is terrible for the quality of the image

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0