HOME | DD
Turbofurby β The Panzer VIII Maus
Published: 2014-04-23 10:54:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 2690; Favourites: 46; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I finished Girls und Panzer last night and I took a screenshot last night of the Maus so I thought "Eh, why the hell not?" But seriously, the Maus is a practically unstoppable tank.Related content
Comments: 23
π: 0 β©: 0
too bad they were never mass produced! or mass produced enough to alter the war!
π: 0 β©: 0
Or the 0-1, The Ratte, or anything bigger.
π: 0 β©: 0
Don't forget to play the Cabal Stomp when you bring it into battle. You have to have the epic, and threatening music in the background to make them wish they had a diaper.
π: 0 β©: 0
Unstoppable for WWII yes but the Germans only made about two, Β also I think a bomber would just tear it to shreds.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 0
In theory, it might be able to, but the thing is that it has so much armor all around that the bombs could impact and might not do any damage at all, there's also that at the time of World War II, bombing wasn't very accurate unless it was a dive bomb and even then it wasn't uncommon to miss.
π: 0 β©: 0
Please to see you likes Girls Und Panzer 
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, not really.Β The original Maus tanks in World War 2 were boondoggles.Β They suffered from all kinds of mechanical problems and broke down often.Β Their treads were their greatest weak point.Β They were just too big, too heavy, and their motive system just could not handle the weight of the whole tank.Β They LOOKED impressive, and they were surprisingly maneuverable, but their off-road performance was terrible.
π: 0 β©: 0
That thing looks overpowered as hell (it probably is, too).
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't know about the TOG...it's rough and tough but I don't think it'd win.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well a Hetzer, type 89, and a pz 4 killed it, so TOG crush it.
π: 0 β©: 0
No, still pretty sure it can withstand an M1 Abrams.
π: 0 β©: 1
The Abrams went to war and came back without casualties.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
That doesn't change anything, their crew was more skilled than the opposing tank crew and plus they were attack from outdated tanks and weapons. We've never got to see the full potential of the Maus because it wasn't fully completed. But the Ratte, if it was completed though....
π: 0 β©: 2
And the Sherman wasn't outdated as well as the crew. You're forgetting about the heat round , that is meant to destroy tanks from the inside. Abram tank has near indestructible armor complete mobility and top of the line auto-reload and the ammunition.....^_^ just love to hear what it is.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wasn't completed due to Germany going to war when their resources were not enough to supply. Don't forget they were heavily outnumbered, outgunned and out maneuvered by both the western allies and the red ,aka Russian, army. The sandwiching was brilliant in war and the Nazi's command structure and tactics were not good. A unit is only good if the commander is.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dude you're trying to teach me something I already know so this argument is over. I win. End of story.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yet this argument was on the topic of the Abrams and Maus. On how they can combat each other. In the end the Abrams wins.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're the one trying to put an outdated tank against a modern one. You're the one not making it an even fight so I win.
π: 0 β©: 1
