Comments: 31
TheNakedArgonian [2017-03-31 19:16:12 +0000 UTC]
Please, more of this dragon! Such a lovely looking beast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FengatorMx6 [2010-09-09 03:21:31 +0000 UTC]
I think the interesting part is that no one actually looks at a reptile, you cannot see their muscle definition in anything other than the arms. Not to say this isn't good though. ^..^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twentieth In reply to FengatorMx6 [2010-09-10 01:57:39 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. Little cylinders on four legs, the whole lot of 'em!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FengatorMx6 In reply to Twentieth [2010-09-10 03:17:20 +0000 UTC]
Yep, because the scales hide the definition. Just like a cat's fur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dracenmarx [2010-09-08 21:53:43 +0000 UTC]
Wow, great back muscles ^^ In most pictures you only see pectoral muscles, so this is a very nice change.
And well, the feet are nicely drawn ^_^ It would be great if you would accept my group submission request ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
S-DLSea [2010-07-19 02:17:46 +0000 UTC]
This is pretty cool. I've wanted to create a dragon character that was bipedal,
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artizek [2006-04-16 19:23:42 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful work, I really admire the bunching of the muscles in the shoulders and the foreshortening of the legs. I think you've done it very nicely but the black shadow seems to distract from the figure too much, so you might want to make it a shade of grey or get rid of it entirely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twentieth In reply to artizek [2006-04-19 06:22:11 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, yes, the shadow was a bit of an after thought. Thanks for the input.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artizek In reply to Twentieth [2006-04-19 06:30:58 +0000 UTC]
*gives him a nice shoulder rub*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deyaz75 [2006-03-22 14:39:06 +0000 UTC]
question: this back character is from your test character? Is the same character?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twentieth In reply to Deyaz75 [2006-03-24 01:31:35 +0000 UTC]
it is one and the same, yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
raeth [2005-12-21 19:40:41 +0000 UTC]
Looks like some really good musclature to me!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChaoseVIIn [2005-07-03 19:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Studies are good. I've always been inclined to draw a finished version the first time through...and have met with much frustration. I'd say you have the form down fairly well, as is. The right leg's perspective is a bit off, but you're probably aware of that...
And that's quite a well-kept dragon creature...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TKorca [2005-07-01 10:07:04 +0000 UTC]
Youve got some great anatomy here. Keep it up and im sure that you'll get better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twentieth In reply to TKorca [2005-07-01 13:09:43 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I will keep at it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wilder3 [2005-07-01 05:21:37 +0000 UTC]
Smome one needs to keep things pulled together. I can barely do reality at all I'm very proud of any one who can.
Nice deviation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twentieth In reply to wilder3 [2005-07-01 13:09:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. And thank you for the fav as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lysozyme [2005-07-01 03:26:59 +0000 UTC]
Neat!!
Legs look a tad small, however.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
S-DLSea In reply to Twentieth [2011-01-27 05:58:21 +0000 UTC]
This is REALLY REALLY old, I know, but if you think of the legs simply as tubes, and draw ellipses signifying the roundness of that tube...
Perspective comes into play here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0