Comments: 69
SamBiswas95 [2020-04-13 05:38:50 +0000 UTC]
What if you tried that on a human? XD
π: 1 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to SamBiswas95 [2020-04-13 20:57:21 +0000 UTC]
Furries? But seriously, that's an interesting thought.Β
π: 4 β©: 1
SamBiswas95 In reply to Viergacht [2020-04-14 00:14:18 +0000 UTC]
Reconstructing a human skull from a wolf or puma? Or reconstructing a wolf or puma skull from a human?Β
π: 3 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to SamBiswas95 [2020-04-15 01:55:30 +0000 UTC]
The second would be incredibly creepy.
π: 5 β©: 2
Jdailey1991 [2018-09-08 23:46:15 +0000 UTC]
Have you ever thought about illustrating their whole bodies?
π: 1 β©: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 [2017-10-11 20:14:55 +0000 UTC]
You know, these interesting examples of paleofail reminds to me the Shrink Wrapped animals.
Do you know it?
It's about reconstructing modern animals in the way we would reconstruct the dinosaurs and others ancient animals.
π: 4 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2017-10-12 17:42:54 +0000 UTC]
Yep, even back when it was a popular trope I thought it looked kind of weird.Β
π: 2 β©: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Viergacht [2017-10-12 22:41:12 +0000 UTC]
Well, it have too look weird.
Look at the platypus, knowing just his skeleton would you make an actual egg-laying mammal?
π: 2 β©: 0
Viergacht In reply to nekonotaishou [2017-02-28 02:20:59 +0000 UTC]
Same. Although it is pretty amazing we known some dinosaur colors now, and all the little feathered critters they've been finding recently.
π: 0 β©: 1
nekonotaishou In reply to Viergacht [2017-02-28 15:52:10 +0000 UTC]
It's absolutely amazing, and it's a good point to bring up when there are people teetering on the edge of the feather argument who happen to be artists; I have "converted" at least one person that way, lol.
Supposedly there was a new plesiosaur fossil with soft tissue or soft tissue indicators that showed they were fatty?
π: 0 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to nekonotaishou [2017-02-28 18:14:04 +0000 UTC]
Oh cool! Makes sense, for streamlining and keeping them warm.
π: 0 β©: 0
bensen-daniel [2017-02-16 07:52:10 +0000 UTC]
I forgot how cool these were
π: 1 β©: 0
Corallianassa [2016-12-15 17:57:00 +0000 UTC]
The Canis concolor looks adorable!
Anyway, I agree.
Someone once said: ''Hey, Microraptor was black, why did you illustrate Changyuraptor as brown!?''
I facepalmed.
π: 1 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Corallianassa [2016-12-15 20:27:40 +0000 UTC]
Oy. And we don't even know if solid black was both genders, like crows, or just one.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
Serulfen [2016-10-10 19:54:27 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, lots of feathered theropod dinosaurs, especially dromaeosaurs, are so often given colors that are either heavily influenced or even completely taken from a living species of bird. Like what if those dinos had completely different color patterns than any living birds, since the relation IS still pretty distant, even though both are classified inside Dinosauria.... Dromaeosaurs even had lips and teeth, unlike living birds, so.... They must've been very, very different-looking, despite having had feathers and had common ancestry with them.
Your drawing here demonstrates very well why I think lastly mentioned is kinda disturbing. It's lazy. To wrap something extinct in the skin, flesh and color of something living. It may be so inaccurate.
Extinct dinosaurs get constantly wrapped in soft tissue from living dinosaurs (birds), various lizards and crocodilians. Rarely does one see a reconstruction where dinosaurs would look more like their own thing.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Serulfen [2016-10-11 10:10:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I don't like it when an exact pattern & color is lifted wholesale for a serious reconstruction, although it can be cute in a less-serious drawing. Obviously there's going to be some convergeance - countershading, stripes for disruptive camo, etc - but artists should really take the opportunity to be creative.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
Serulfen In reply to Viergacht [2016-10-12 00:35:11 +0000 UTC]
Couldn't agree more, with these exact words you spoke.
π: 0 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Serulfen [2016-10-12 12:02:48 +0000 UTC]
Have you seen - he's really amazing at coming up unique and believable patterns for his prehistoric reconstructions.
π: 0 β©: 0
CyberneticCupcake [2016-09-23 17:35:00 +0000 UTC]
Very fascinating cat-wolf and dog-tiger. Kinda wish there were domesticated cat-dogs; they look much cuter.
π: 0 β©: 1
MviluUatusun [2016-05-22 19:24:16 +0000 UTC]
Interesting.Β My icon is my OC Amanda Fuchs.Β She's a tiger-striped red fox who has a tiger's face and here you are drawing something similar using a wolf and a puma.
π: 0 β©: 1
ankanyam [2016-04-05 21:44:55 +0000 UTC]
My two favorite animals UNITED!
π: 0 β©: 0
TrottingPeryton [2016-02-22 22:06:29 +0000 UTC]
An interesting concept on how paleo art's strengths and limitations. So often artists turn to known and familiar animals to fill in the blank of an unknown.
π: 0 β©: 1
TrottingPeryton In reply to Viergacht [2016-02-25 18:08:39 +0000 UTC]
Totally true. It is always interesting to explore all sorts of possibilities and interpretations.
π: 0 β©: 0
Guyverman [2016-01-27 02:00:20 +0000 UTC]
Also, I don;t think Creodonts would've looked too dog like either.
π: 1 β©: 0
MitziMonster [2016-01-01 01:46:46 +0000 UTC]
This is very fun to look at
π: 0 β©: 1
Guyverman [2015-10-30 05:22:04 +0000 UTC]
I think the same applies to Dinotheirum.
π: 0 β©: 1
Guyverman In reply to Viergacht [2015-10-30 10:24:17 +0000 UTC]
How do you think the would've looked different?
π: 0 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Guyverman [2015-10-30 10:32:22 +0000 UTC]
If it were me, I would paint it with more of a furry coat like calves have. It split off from modern elephants pretty early, so I'm not sure how much like them it would have been in little details like the ear shape and so on. Plus a lot of artists just seem to get the shape of the head wrong - the trunk would have been very massive at the base, not at all like a modern elephant - and it must have been doing something really odd with those tusks.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
WarriorWolfsBane [2015-07-27 00:02:03 +0000 UTC]
Just the picture looked awesome! Then I read the description and it got even better! Please do more of these
π: 0 β©: 0
Domisea [2015-07-24 18:35:29 +0000 UTC]
Hah, awesome! From aesthetic point of view, I prefer Canis concolor ^^ Though it somehow look weird, but I can't say why... maybe it looks sapient? O-o
Though for reconstructing they would probably use a closer relatives, like bears, raccoons for canine and civets in feline's case. That would give more accurate effect (though they couldn't know it xD). Unless they are extinct too O_o Yeah, that would be a problem XD.
π: 0 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to Domisea [2015-07-26 11:20:51 +0000 UTC]
They probably would, but it probably also partly depends on the artist's skill, and whoever did the first reconstruction sort of creating a trope - I deliberately used very unalike carnivores to make the image more striking.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
monotsleigh [2015-07-20 20:56:17 +0000 UTC]
Before I read the description I was like you've given them the wrong structure!! But once I read the description the world made sense! But it's a really interesting thought that I've never thought before. Reminds me a bit of when they thought the iguanadons thumb claws were a type of odd horn so for a while you only had illustrations of them with horns not thumb claws!
π: 0 β©: 0
ShadowKiwi [2015-07-15 19:41:44 +0000 UTC]
I love this! Β I think about this a lot.
Most paleoart tends to go on the conservative side enveloping the animal with simple bland meat and skin. Β Others mock it up with closest living relative's skins. Β
All in all they seem kind of conservatively wrong somehow.
Reconstructed monkeys and apes from the point of view of never seeing them is also pretty creepy
π: 1 β©: 1
Viergacht In reply to ShadowKiwi [2015-07-16 15:49:42 +0000 UTC]
I usually try to go with something reminiscent of living animals in a similar ecological niche, but the further back you go in time the inevitably more speculative you have to get. I'd rather see a little bit of imagination than just being boring, tho.
π: 1 β©: 0
Koeskull [2015-07-07 21:07:37 +0000 UTC]
Very cool concept, I don't think I've seen the idea shown like this before.
π: 0 β©: 0
Pasurus [2015-07-07 11:45:48 +0000 UTC]
Thisis well though
π: 0 β©: 0
gloade [2015-07-07 11:13:47 +0000 UTC]
totally cool !
π: 0 β©: 0
randomflyingpigeons [2015-07-07 02:41:36 +0000 UTC]
This is really cool. Have you ever read All Yesterdays? I assume you have due to your knowledge and interest in paleoart, but I figured I'd mention it since I really enjoyed reading it, myself.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>