Comments: 56
VJagev In reply to ??? [2012-07-25 20:12:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Up to 5:1 depending of the extension tubes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoeGP In reply to VJagev [2012-07-25 23:02:19 +0000 UTC]
yeah but the original magnification (without extension tubes) is 1:1 right ? the only lens i know that does more then that is the Canon MPE 65mm.
If that's true then i really need to hurry and get me some extension tubes, do you use the cheap ones with no contacts or the more expensive Kenko ones that have contacts ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to JoeGP [2012-07-26 13:21:49 +0000 UTC]
Roughly it is 1:1 and it's pin sharp up to 5:1. I use some no-name extension tubes with contacts because I use them with my normal macro lenses so the kenko should be ok.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoeGP In reply to VJagev [2012-07-26 15:53:31 +0000 UTC]
do yo have a picture of this lens ? or is it a bellows ? or both ?
Does it look like this ? [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to JoeGP [2012-07-26 19:43:57 +0000 UTC]
Yes, that,s it. Here is a link to a good site with plenty of info regarding macro lenses: [link]
The lens on your link is mounted onto a bellows, but you can use extension tubes as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoeGP In reply to VJagev [2012-07-26 21:09:10 +0000 UTC]
hey thanx, interesting site, i wonder if they make that lens in canon mount, are they expensive ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to JoeGP [2012-07-27 10:42:47 +0000 UTC]
It has a RMS mount, you have to buy an adapter RMS to Canon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoeGP In reply to VJagev [2012-07-27 11:45:01 +0000 UTC]
OK, thanx
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
butterbagel [2012-04-08 20:38:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow amazing... Simply amazing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AkuZeku [2012-03-23 21:04:52 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to AkuZeku [2012-03-30 17:49:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ForeverLilly [2012-03-03 16:05:06 +0000 UTC]
incredible. great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AnjaSchlegelmilch [2012-02-28 16:59:45 +0000 UTC]
wow,awsome close-up! amazing focussed and clear
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jcwpooh [2012-02-26 05:31:54 +0000 UTC]
Superb, Awesome Capture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Phur-eak [2012-02-25 22:40:01 +0000 UTC]
beautiful capture
almost nothing better than a good micro
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HaidingeR [2012-02-25 19:21:07 +0000 UTC]
Not exifs sniffff
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to HaidingeR [2012-02-25 22:14:30 +0000 UTC]
It's complicated... the lens I use generates no exif data
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HaidingeR In reply to VJagev [2012-02-25 23:47:46 +0000 UTC]
I understand. It's a pity
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KittyVel [2012-02-24 20:15:07 +0000 UTC]
Wow, this is an amazing shot! Beautiful work!
May I ask what kind of camera and lens you used?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VJagev In reply to KittyVel [2012-02-24 20:16:57 +0000 UTC]
Nikon D90 with a Zeiss Luminar 63mm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KittyVel In reply to VJagev [2012-02-24 20:21:51 +0000 UTC]
Sounds expensive...lol If only I could afford a decent camera. My dog is so cooperative with the camera, and she's really photogenic. I bet I could get some great pictures of her if I had a camera that was halfway decent. >.<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Marmotica [2012-02-22 16:13:43 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>