donmcg [2007-06-18 06:22:23 +0000 UTC]
my pleasure! Its still a very striking image
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
donmcg [2007-06-15 04:25:56 +0000 UTC]
that image show great compsition and depth without any blur so it is certainly not necessary - remember too you can control bliur and depth of field with aperture settings as well as relying on manipulations after the shot Nice image
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wafflellita In reply to donmcg [2007-06-17 19:22:19 +0000 UTC]
thank you, i appreciate your comment very much ^^ i control and am very aware of the aperture settings and velocity when using a better camera, this one's not that good
wafflellita [2007-02-05 01:45:02 +0000 UTC]
thank you for the comment, i've been thinking about it i usually don't manipulate my pictures, but i really appreciate it
thaogb [2007-01-29 04:53:48 +0000 UTC]
you could have blured something... either background , either some of body. picture is really nice and good, but needs a bit manipulation. :> take care