Comments: 64
dth1971 [2012-09-27 03:13:28 +0000 UTC]
That's a what if Playboy was published in 1938.
π: 0 β©: 0
oh-static-mushroom [2012-07-18 06:55:59 +0000 UTC]
Oh my god... that hairdo...
π: 0 β©: 1
HowAboutLunch [2012-02-12 17:12:00 +0000 UTC]
amazing shot & editing!!
π: 0 β©: 1
jimroby2k [2012-02-11 19:08:54 +0000 UTC]
Nice shot and embellishment. Just wondering if you experienced any pushback from PB from using their trademark? Great idea, great vintage bathing suit and shoes, pretty lady.
π: 0 β©: 1
zenyth11 [2012-02-11 09:23:53 +0000 UTC]
very lovely!
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to daertrijckephoto [2012-02-12 08:24:22 +0000 UTC]
I take it he was not flattering in it? Some could carry it off.
π: 0 β©: 1
daertrijckephoto In reply to walker1812 [2012-02-12 19:52:35 +0000 UTC]
oh he looked alright, not my kind of guy though.
π: 0 β©: 0
HFXmermaid [2011-10-04 02:19:15 +0000 UTC]
great idea
π: 0 β©: 1
Krpa-d-em [2010-11-15 03:45:57 +0000 UTC]
great shot, and here's a minor critique. i do a lot of graphic arts stuff, so the first thing i noticed was that the color of white in the word PLAYBOY should be toned a few shades down and the sharp images make it look too computerized - but the model and shot is right on the mark.
π: 0 β©: 1
intheredhat [2010-08-24 00:25:23 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful concept! Her hair looks great. Well done.
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to intheredhat [2010-08-24 00:55:26 +0000 UTC]
thanks... she did her own hair even, very talented
π: 0 β©: 0
robwingman [2010-08-22 11:17:30 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome Brother.
In my opinion this is one of those shots that will forever have a place in your portfolio.
Great Image, great idea, Beautiful model.
π: 0 β©: 1
taylani [2010-08-20 21:58:37 +0000 UTC]
This is great and the model is very beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to taylani [2010-08-21 00:42:34 +0000 UTC]
thank you
π: 0 β©: 0
Muskeg [2010-08-18 06:52:02 +0000 UTC]
I love it! Wonderful color choices, and a great look from your model, too. Nice work!
π: 0 β©: 1
Muskeg In reply to walker1812 [2010-08-18 08:45:26 +0000 UTC]
Heh, yeah... I've been a fan of your work for some time now. I'd be hard-pressed to guess how long now, but I think your guess is about right--at least a couple of years. Your work is ever an inspiration, my friend.
π: 0 β©: 1
africanimages [2010-08-17 10:39:45 +0000 UTC]
Great pic!
π: 0 β©: 1
DannyBillArgent [2010-08-16 21:34:59 +0000 UTC]
I'm thrilled to see that this worked and has drawn a good response as I have been planning on doing something similar although from different era, (hours of research so far!).
I'm of the opinion that, if you don't know what pigeon-hole the photo belongs in, then you must be doing something right. Although I'm glad you put it somewhere where I could find it.
π: 0 β©: 1
DannyBillArgent In reply to walker1812 [2010-08-16 22:58:40 +0000 UTC]
About 1967-1972.
...but not Playboy. I have been looking at staging and faking a number of different styles from holiday snaps to magazine advertising.
We have been looking at retro wallpaper on ebay and going around the charity shops looking at hideous junk! Even if it never happens, it's been a lot of laughs so far!
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to DannyBillArgent [2010-08-16 23:06:06 +0000 UTC]
That's an interesting time period. The popular culture depicted in ads didn't really reflect the pop culture we remember as being iconic for that time. Should be some interesting stuff
π: 0 β©: 0
Taraakian [2010-08-16 20:45:57 +0000 UTC]
Love the classic vintage look.
Vintage playboy is so much more appealing than modern playboy that is so airbrushed the models look like PVC dolls.
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to Taraakian [2010-08-16 20:50:25 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, i really enjoyed looking at the classic images from the '50s to research the magazine cover... i just missed it by about 15 years, lol
π: 0 β©: 0
walker1812 In reply to nitro1967 [2010-08-16 20:07:36 +0000 UTC]
Oh I know the first issue was in 1953 and there was only one issue for that year. I went and studied the magazine headers from that era and font to copy.
The bathing suit is actually something that is '30s... it was a daring swimsuit in the '30s and by the '50s was becoming sort of matronly. There is only 12 years between them, it's like a girl wearing a swimsuit from 1998 today.
In the '30s it would have been sexy as hell and a tad risquΓ© to wear this suit. In the '50s that honor would have moved on to the bikini and other suits. Playboy would have a girl in something cutting edge sexy for the cover. At least that was my rational.
As for Hef being 12? he developed early, lol
π: 0 β©: 1
walker1812 In reply to BenHammonds [2010-08-16 20:09:52 +0000 UTC]
lol, well i didn't want an actual production year, as i made up the date though i started thinking about Playboy August 1776... having an implied shot of Betsy Ross sewing the American Flag with the finished part draped over her hiding the important bits.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>