Comments: 14
christina1969 [2016-05-07 12:13:52 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watjong In reply to christina1969 [2016-05-21 13:37:58 +0000 UTC]
hey thanks for the heads up - I drew this in 2012, based on photos of a reconstructed cast of a Giganotosaurus skull.
I figured the reconstructions were correct back then, but they might have been off.
I'll look into it.
I was planning on updating these dinosaur skulls anyway, and I want them to reflect recent understanding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Harley-1979 [2013-02-07 13:24:26 +0000 UTC]
Incredible! I always like to study the concept of T-Rex v Giganotosaurus. The sheer difference in their skulls is just staggering
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Harley-1979 In reply to watjong [2013-02-07 21:49:02 +0000 UTC]
I would think that Gig', with that narrow head would go after smaller prey. What is so striking about T-Rex is that bottom jaw. I can imagine it taking down anything
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watjong In reply to Harley-1979 [2013-02-09 13:08:43 +0000 UTC]
That might be true. Although smaller is relative I guess,
with a maw of 1,5 meters or so. On Trex's bottom jaw, I agree.
What the ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Harley-1979 In reply to watjong [2013-02-09 14:58:28 +0000 UTC]
Sometimes though, at certain angles, T-Rex's head almost looks disproportionate to the rest of it's body. It's head is like a weapon of mass destruction
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watjong In reply to Harley-1979 [2013-02-10 11:18:56 +0000 UTC]
It certainly looks like the original weapon of mass destruction.
That's what always struck me in the debates between paleontologists,
on whether T-rex was a scavenger or a predator.
Of course, scavenging would probably not be beneath it, lions and sharks
scavenge too. But look at that head. That is not built for scavenging.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Harley-1979 In reply to watjong [2013-02-10 21:30:12 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, good call. If your jaws are strong enough to bend metal, they're there for something more than scavenging, lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BakaPerkele [2012-10-08 12:47:42 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic once again. *-------*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1