Comments: 13
Art3fact [2011-07-15 13:13:48 +0000 UTC]
Nice shot ! Good Job!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gizmo7785 [2011-07-11 23:04:27 +0000 UTC]
this is beautiful~
it looks so perfect, it's unreal.
like a painting xDD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WiDoWm4k3r In reply to bluetaipan [2011-07-10 14:13:49 +0000 UTC]
Haha cheers man! Luckily I have a 1800PSI karcher, I managed to get them faily clean again haha still need a bit of bleaching for the final touch though lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluetaipan In reply to WiDoWm4k3r [2011-07-10 14:14:24 +0000 UTC]
hahah still looks good!@ and you must live near by there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WiDoWm4k3r In reply to bluetaipan [2011-07-11 13:26:02 +0000 UTC]
Haha I was visiting my cousin in Mooroolbark, It's not a far from there so I decided to go for a drive, I went to give my car a bit of a test out but I saw a sign saying Mt Donna Buang Rainforest Gallery Skywalk so I thought there could be something cool in there. I took some other photos too but they were proof it's time to invest in a CPL filter lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluetaipan In reply to WiDoWm4k3r [2011-07-11 20:39:37 +0000 UTC]
Fair enough! And yes you must! I use that most of the time for my long exposures of water, and boy it works!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WiDoWm4k3r In reply to bluetaipan [2011-07-12 00:57:14 +0000 UTC]
Haha Oh nah it was fine not having it for my water shots, it was the mountain scapes that were the issue, CPLs cut through glare and Haze, which there was a lot of. They also help the lens render colours better in glary scenes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluetaipan In reply to WiDoWm4k3r [2011-07-12 02:42:44 +0000 UTC]
Fair enough. And I have been told for water shots it is better as it cuts alot of the waters glare.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1