HOME | DD
wonderwhy-ER — Smoke
Published: 2007-06-29 21:47:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 13393; Favourites: 56; Downloads: 293
Redirect to original
Description
Flash player 9 needed: [link]So this is what i wanted to make when i was playing with [link] and [link]
Ouh and change quality to low becose with good filter quality it lags... But looks awasome
Controls:
Space - to turn on/off turbulance(not really turbulance) map
Mouse button - rise air pressure. Check it with space-on to see what it does.
Related content
Comments: 46
I was thinking on this while playing xDDDD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yay, i'm not the only one xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*very fascinated* i have been staring at it for an hour now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
awesome like all your stuff. i could mess with this for hours.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You can't imagine how much i messed with my stuff
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
My dad, a hydrologist, suggests to get realistic fluid motion in the smoke column,
start a pulse from one edge of the screen, in one direction. As it travels it should form eddies on its edges that mix with the surrounding air. Drop dye into a glass of water and watch how it disperses.
he'll draw a picture and ill post it in scraps and send u the link
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Heh. Cool. Thanks... There is oneinteresting thign in the inet. Here goes: [link]
I really like the way turbulance is made in it... It would be interesting to know how he did it...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah best such thign i seen so far. One other thing i recomend to check is cortex command.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
does adobe sell any older verisons of the flash softerware for less?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I suppose that no. But you can try to find it on such palces as eBay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Looks nice ... it's more like some sort of plasma-smoke orso
And it looks like it could use some optimization
Have you tried using actionscript 3 or the bitmapclass ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Heh. It is AS3 and it is Bitmapdata + bitmafilters thing. I knwo that it is slow... Large size and not very fast way of making wind... But i don't knwo any other for now...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah .. ok
I think the filters slow it down .... and I don't know the 'flow-field' algortithm .... but the effect is nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I suppose that fitlers sow the most. It jsut that 600x600 picture filtering takes much processor time... I think i can make it faster by reducing the size of bmp...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's always a difficult thing to find a balance between eye-candy and speed
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No i just prefere interactive variants. You can check uninteractiv fire i made. It is not interactive(at least i don't know how to make it interactive for now) But looks good and works fine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes ...the fire looks nice too !!
It shouldn't be that hard to make it interactive with the mouse ?
[link] <-- my latest interactive simulation ..... I wanted it to be fast ... so no filters
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow. Good one. I didn't noticed that you have flash. I will go look mroe carefully
About fire... There used few thigns based on perlin noise and displacement map. Turbulant map is generated for displacment fitler and then displacement is used. To make it interactive i need to draw something in turbulant map before using it in displacement filter. It hsore is possible but preaty hard task... Need to perform more experements on making dispalcmeent maps...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sweet!
Laggy though AAH. (And yes, I'm even on low)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah 600x600 is little bit big for such effect...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
