HOME | DD

xQUATROx — dA Points by

Published: 2012-02-28 07:22:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 1726; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description Another freebie for dA lovers!

Feel free to download this image and/or the provided 3Ds MAX file (compatible with MAX 2010 and up)

Modeled in 3Ds MAX 2012, Rendered with Mental Ray



Updated version:
Related content
Comments: 8

JFGemini107 [2012-02-28 07:54:23 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


This looks wonderful and I really love the way it turned out. If you were looking for an exact version of the dA points logo, I noticed that you were missing a ring on each point. Which points logo did you use as a reference? I'm referring to the black rings on the sides in this page. [link]

Another inconsistency I noticed is the way the glossiness shows on the top of the points themselves. On the point in the front, it looks like the light is coming from the right side and on the point in the back, it looks like the light is coming from the left. If the light is coming from the top, then the plus signs would also be glossy.

I really like the floating effect the plus signs create, though it also addresses the lighting inconsistency issue since the shadows are directly behind the plus signs.

I gave 4 stars for impact because when I saw this in my DevWatch messages, it really stood out for me. I really like the vision as well, and I gave a few stars for technique since the grooves aren't easy to do and they really show well here.

Overall, It's a great start, but I feel it needs to be more like the actual points logo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xQUATROx In reply to JFGemini107 [2012-02-28 08:01:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the crit!
I will probably have to update it to contain the ring, which I totally gapped it (but artistic freedom is always good, no?)
For something I slapped together in 10 minutes it turned out pretty nice
The reflections/highlights you see come from an HDR dome, however the actual shadow-casting light in the scene is just a skylight, so that is why you noticed a mismatch - sharp eye there!
Overall, I take this critique as fair and as a pin-point for where to go further with this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JFGemini107 In reply to xQUATROx [2012-02-28 08:08:06 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

It doesn't really matter if the ring's there. I just mentioned it in case you were going off a reference. I'm not sure what you mean by 'gapped it' though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xQUATROx In reply to JFGemini107 [2012-02-28 11:29:30 +0000 UTC]

"gapped it" - forgot about it, did not notice it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JFGemini107 In reply to xQUATROx [2012-02-28 16:26:16 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xQUATROx In reply to JFGemini107 [2012-02-29 03:42:40 +0000 UTC]

I made a version with a ring now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JFGemini107 In reply to xQUATROx [2012-02-29 03:50:06 +0000 UTC]

The new version looks awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xQUATROx In reply to JFGemini107 [2012-02-29 04:46:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0