Comments: 234
segura2112 [2018-04-10 22:19:28 +0000 UTC]
!! Thank You
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Galehad [2018-04-10 14:11:32 +0000 UTC]
how did you (or your photographers) achieve the warm green/yellow light?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Redatomisk [2018-04-10 12:11:30 +0000 UTC]
If there were any female warriors in old times, im pretty sure they wouldn't look like they bought their armor from Victoria's secret
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
matthew-lane In reply to Redatomisk [2018-04-11 06:58:47 +0000 UTC]
Oh hun, if you think you can purchase something like this from Victoria's Secret, that would heavily suggest that you've never once set foot in a Victoria's Secret. Also it would heavily suggest that you didn't read the description, which explains the underlying background of the image, which was designed to emulate a popular genre of speculative fiction, that was popular in the 1970's & 1980's, which drew it's influences from the Barsoon series of novels by Edgar Rice Burroughs originally written in the turn of the last century.
Also for the record Enyo the Greek goddess of war was classically depicted in mythology as not wearing armour, she wore next to nothing, being that she was a goddess, not a soldier. Heck even the classic statues of Bellona, the Roman version of Enyo is depicted as nearly completely nude, all but for a war helm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Redatomisk In reply to matthew-lane [2018-04-11 10:39:22 +0000 UTC]
Too long; didn't read- i think i got my point across just fine thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
matthew-lane In reply to Redatomisk [2018-04-11 10:53:19 +0000 UTC]
"Too long; didn't read- i think i got my point across just fine thanks"
Translation: "Read every word of it, can't figure out how to refute it, I'll just pretend I didn't read it but totally could have refuted it if I wanted to, no one will ever see thru that clever ruse"
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Redatomisk In reply to matthew-lane [2018-04-11 10:59:09 +0000 UTC]
Also don't assume I'm dumb just because i chose not to humor your salty little rant there. I'm entitled to not like it and I'm damn sure going to say something about it. Plenty of people are crazy about this, so I'm pretty sure the model and/or costume designer won't feel bad about one negative comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
matthew-lane In reply to Redatomisk [2018-04-11 11:41:35 +0000 UTC]
"Also don't assume I'm dumb just because i chose not to humor your salty little rant there."
Translation: "Damn it, he's on to me. He knows I read everything he wrote, but couldn't refute it. Maybe if I pretend what he wrote was a rant he'll not notice."
"I'm entitled to not like it"
Translation: "Maybe if I pretend it's an issue of subjective dislike, rather than me simply being wrong about statements I made, he'll not notice that I'm desperately trying to obfuscate that fact."
"Plenty of people are crazy about this, so I'm pretty sure the model and/or costume designer won't feel bad about one negative comment."
Translation: "I know, I'll pretend my statements aren't objectively wrong, by pointing out that other people like this image & since other people like tis image, it's like my incorrect statements were never incorrect at all. I wonder if he's buying it? Hmmm, doesn't look like it, maybe if I write a second comment where I continue to pretend I can address the points he made if I wanted to, but never actually doing so."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Redatomisk In reply to matthew-lane [2018-04-11 10:55:21 +0000 UTC]
Whatever helps you sleep at night. I stopped reading when i saw cited eras this was from. I really don't care, i just think it's an overblown costume
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
matthew-lane In reply to Redatomisk [2018-04-11 11:41:32 +0000 UTC]
"Whatever helps you sleep at night. I stopped reading when i saw cited eras this was from. I really don't care, i just think it's an overblown costume"
Translation: "Hmmmmm, maybe if I double down in to my denial of having read this, he'll believe me this time? Yep, because if someone doesn't believe me the first time I use a poor non-argument clearly they'll believe it the second time I try exactly the same argument, while accidentally admitting that I read it."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FatzJinXX [2018-04-10 08:34:09 +0000 UTC]
No need to explain.This is art,nothing more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WolfLordss In reply to FatzJinXX [2018-04-10 16:08:08 +0000 UTC]
Art is pretty. This is not pretty.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
IT IS BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
litha-the-black-cat [2018-04-09 21:46:52 +0000 UTC]
me tiene chata esta mina, le da con las tetas, tiene una obsesion igual que los faperos. Sus trajes no son ni tan buenos si no fuese porque muestra los props que se mando a hacer con el cirujano...se ve deforme
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RealWriterX [2018-04-09 17:55:47 +0000 UTC]
I shall first give much praise to the quality of the photographs, costume and props! The poses are also rather nice.
And, here comes the "But". The "But" (surprisingly enough perhaps) is in regards to the title of photographs. The costume/clothes do not make me think of "War". Closer to seduction or beauty. The dagger, in turn, makes me think of "Shadowy" actions (so, something that could go in line with Seduction).
If I were to say what this would make me think of is a "Goddess of Serpents". A deity/being that is in equal parts beautiful and alluring while also deadly and dangerous. It might be a very "bland" and "unoriginal" idea, but at the same time what I see here is not a Goddess of War. The Mace, especially, seems out of place, a spear might had been a more interesting choice.
And while, yes, some people might say that these photograph are inappropriate, I would still say they are far better than what I usually see on the Deviantart frontpage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Horticulous [2018-04-09 00:40:10 +0000 UTC]
Oh no, boobs! What will this do to the children!?
Sarcasm aside, I like the design. We are inundated with costumes designed to be sexy through exposure so it's refreshing to see exposure with more nuance to it's purpose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sweetdreamz12 [2018-04-08 23:51:02 +0000 UTC]
YAYA is HOT HOT!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
litha-the-black-cat In reply to Mephisth-Mitsuru [2018-04-09 21:41:02 +0000 UTC]
esos props deben haberle costado caros pero no los hizo ella...devalua todo el cosplay ya que es lo unico que le fascina mostrar
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mephisth-Mitsuru In reply to litha-the-black-cat [2018-04-09 23:29:57 +0000 UTC]
Me tiene podrido, es invasiva, desde hace años que estoy cansado de verla pero aparece por todos lados. es una china fea y lo peor es que es artificial. Las tetas se las ha pagado el novio millonario como todos los cosplays comprados que viste. A ver cuando madura y se dedica a otra cosa a si no tengo que volver a verla nunca mas.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dowelljessica [2018-04-08 23:37:37 +0000 UTC]
This is so beautiful!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GodlyJewel [2018-04-08 23:24:19 +0000 UTC]
this is really pretty! I particularly like the headpiece and skirt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tenten110 [2018-04-08 20:32:26 +0000 UTC]
Shame to those who mistake photos like this as pornographic since they see the exposed woman's body as something sexual
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
litha-the-black-cat In reply to Tenten110 [2018-04-09 21:43:04 +0000 UTC]
because she expose her female body as a sexual object...so...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DeeJayZephyr [2018-04-08 19:37:10 +0000 UTC]
Please flag mature content properly for people browsing the front page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
imaginarymusiclover In reply to DeeJayZephyr [2018-04-08 21:23:31 +0000 UTC]
Only sexual content requires a filter. If people are unable to handle boons then they shouldn’t be in here
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KizzyAnel [2018-04-08 18:46:51 +0000 UTC]
These are beautiful. I appreciate the creation notes and explanations from an artist to artist standpoint and the behind-the-scenes perspective.
I feel you on paying too much money for just the right fabrics for you to shred haha and the jewelry and tidbits for what is largely a personal project, but the final product is worth it, no?
I'm sorry that these images need explanation; that they cannot just be taken at face value because unfortunately at face value I fear they would be taken as nothing more than titillation. That you had to wait 2 years to share them, that you have to explain that it was because the public wouldn't understand (and some won't) that you had to use an old watermark and explain that you realize how naked you are when you aren't by 'the internet's standards' where a woman can't show her nipples but a man can and even if we go by those rules we are still just creating lewds for lewd sake, that you had to provide production notes so that those who question would feel that you had brains behind this or that even you had to do it with you "most trusted photographer friends" because there is danger otherwise.
I appreciate that you shared these, I appreciate the explanation, I'm sorry you felt it necessary to provide the production notes for more than just the sake of providing production notes for the curious, and I commend your bravery and artistry. Thank you for sharing and your contributions to this community.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TimMcJimFromPL [2018-04-08 18:37:31 +0000 UTC]
O my gosh, this is so beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MasterJohn18 [2018-04-08 17:15:06 +0000 UTC]
stunning
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Candy-L-Lan [2018-04-08 16:43:11 +0000 UTC]
Amazingly gorgeous
Love the sunlight shimmering on the costume, this is epic stuff
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lowwlyy666 [2018-04-08 12:13:35 +0000 UTC]
PERFECT
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Al-Ocramed [2018-04-08 06:34:02 +0000 UTC]
The only thing I would have added would be more ancient Greek armament to the scene somehow, since "Enyo" is a Greek war goddess. BTW, considering how long Yaya has been a professional cosplayer, I seriously doubt that there is anything left to cosplay, other than original pieces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MirageII [2018-04-08 00:01:02 +0000 UTC]
I think you nailed the whole Heavy Metal vibe. I was a big fan of the mag back in the '70s. Very nice job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tcparacelsus [2018-04-07 14:55:09 +0000 UTC]
pretty cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wawful [2018-04-07 02:34:40 +0000 UTC]
COVER THAT UP
*put on tiny things*
PERFECT NOW IT SUITABLE FOR SMOL CHILD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
matthew-lane In reply to Tornados-Heart [2018-04-11 07:02:28 +0000 UTC]
Anyone can be on an 18+ porn site too, but that's not a flaw of the site, it's a lack of parental oversight & that's not an issue for the platform, that's a poor parenting issue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
imaginarymusiclover In reply to Tornados-Heart [2018-04-08 20:28:36 +0000 UTC]
Then why does the DA rules say that you have to be at least 13 to have an account then genius?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
imaginarymusiclover In reply to Tornados-Heart [2018-04-08 21:04:35 +0000 UTC]
“Smol child” = referring to pre-adolescence
besides, if the child is so traumatized by artistic nudity they shouldn’t be on art websites period.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>