Comments: 11
Teratosaur [2019-08-24 23:01:52 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to Teratosaur [2019-08-26 08:36:00 +0000 UTC]
Details is kind of not my specialty. I might have needed a bit more work, time and patience for that, and its hard when you're drawing on a computer. In paper, details are much more prefered, the problem would be making the colours and the light work...
π: 0 β©: 0
TheDinoDrawer66 [2019-07-13 13:08:21 +0000 UTC]
Nice seeing a absurd theropod beingΒ illustrated. Though the neck seems to be off, and the forth finger is also too long. But overall, this looks nice.
π: 0 β©: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to TheDinoDrawer66 [2019-07-13 13:36:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the reply. We never know because we only know the fibula and the tibia of the Fosterovenator, so the rest is speculative.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheDinoDrawer66 In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-07-13 14:48:08 +0000 UTC]
No problem. But in comparison to other ceratosaurids and other four fingered theropods like Eoraptor, the forth finger on the back of the arm is the smallest.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to TheDinoDrawer66 [2019-07-13 15:10:45 +0000 UTC]
Yes indeed that's the case. Oh well, it seems I didn't payed attention to that detail. But again, speculatively speaking, its also a possibility it had an enlarged fourth finger. After all, conservative reconstructions of incomplete specimens is clichΓ©. We know Fosterovenator was a ceratosaur, but what kind, and how it looked like out of that part of the leg, its uncertain. But thanks for the advice nevertheless.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheDinoDrawer66 In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-07-13 15:16:26 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that make some sense. Also your welcome for this small debate.
π: 0 β©: 1
asari13 [2019-07-13 10:19:37 +0000 UTC]
nice
π: 0 β©: 1