Comments: 97
YNot1989 In reply to ??? [2020-10-05 17:17:19 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NewHorizons123 [2018-03-18 23:25:53 +0000 UTC]
Ah, so this is the part of the story where Oprah's ghost starts yelling "You get a country! And you get a country! AND YOU GET A COUNTRY!" It's a great scenario. I can't wait until it gets continued past 2160, if that ever comes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
praetorfenix1994 [2017-08-29 22:07:46 +0000 UTC]
Who are the Tel-bin refugees?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Freedim [2016-05-19 22:28:11 +0000 UTC]
Do you think that Canada will join the United States by the end of the century?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to Freedim [2016-05-23 14:48:22 +0000 UTC]
If they do not join, they'll be subservient to the Americans, if they do join, they surrender their sovereignty. So to my mind it doesn't really matter if they join or not, the question will be as America's status as the global hegemon sinks in, will Canada seek union so that they can at least have a say in how their lives are determined, will their lives be determined for them and the choice removed, or will they chose to continue to be an independent power? I think the first two are the most likely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Freedim In reply to YNot1989 [2016-05-23 15:04:35 +0000 UTC]
Canada joining the US directly is better than forming a new government because in a new government, they would definitely be subservient to us. Instead of being subservient to us, shouldn't they just be one of us as equals?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to Freedim [2016-05-26 16:43:42 +0000 UTC]
States in the union are equal to each-other.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Freedim In reply to YNot1989 [2016-05-26 16:54:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah exactly. Their provinces (with the possible exception of Quebec) would join us as states of the Union, with maybe some special privileges for a little while. Then they would be the same states as the others, with the same rights and privileges as specified in the constitution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TorisChrusade [2016-02-24 07:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Well, technically Greenland is in the US possession due to factual military control - despite being shown as Danish oversea territory or semi-sovereign Greenland.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheTexasRanger [2015-01-30 03:50:17 +0000 UTC]
Before Brazil was invaded by Mexico did they have hopes of eventually annexing the Portuguese speaking nations or are they not as imperialistic as Mexico and the U.S.?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to TheTexasRanger [2015-01-30 16:20:03 +0000 UTC]
They were talking about buying a few ports in West Africa and Macau, but that's about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KitFisto1997 [2015-01-11 06:20:53 +0000 UTC]
Why did the US anschluss the Commonwealth Nations?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to KitFisto1997 [2015-01-11 06:58:16 +0000 UTC]
anshluss? You mean annex? Check out some of my older maps in the Second Renaissance folder to gain a better sense of what happened, but the short version is: Climate change decimated the Anglosphere, most of the Brits, Aussies and Kiwis move stateside, the First Nations got rich and seceded from Canada, an NGO restores the poles, war breaks out in Canada as the first nations move south, the US intervenes, says, "Fuck it," and annexes Canada and the rest of the anglosphere because they basically own them by that point anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The-Archiver In reply to YNot1989 [2015-09-15 00:33:10 +0000 UTC]
I guess since they owned it already, they just figured....ynot XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElSqiubbonator [2014-12-17 17:07:15 +0000 UTC]
Are you CERTAIN this is going to happen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2014-12-18 03:27:56 +0000 UTC]
Not in every detail. I'm confident that we'll see a slow breakup of nation-states throughout the next century or so while the western hemisphere continues to exploit its position to maintain internal stability.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ElSqiubbonator In reply to YNot1989 [2014-12-18 05:20:27 +0000 UTC]
I agree in that broad sense, but trying to predict with such accurate detail so long a time into the future is, in my opinion, futile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2014-12-18 05:37:24 +0000 UTC]
Which is why there's such a thing as Artistic license.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ElSqiubbonator In reply to YNot1989 [2014-12-18 05:45:29 +0000 UTC]
And I don't have a problem with that, as long as you clearly acknowledge when you're using it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2014-12-19 01:37:31 +0000 UTC]
Its marked Sci-fi, its a particularly dry piece of Sci-fi that tries its best to predict major events, but its still sci-fi. I'm not gonna spoon feed my readers something that is already obvious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheTexasRanger [2014-11-18 16:19:29 +0000 UTC]
So how did we get Australia
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to TheTexasRanger [2014-11-19 02:07:54 +0000 UTC]
Australia was rendered all but uninhabitable once they sea levels rose upwards of 7 then 30 meters. This was after their drought had entered its second decade, so the continent was slowly but surely depopulated until an NGO called the Earth Working Group (a bunch of terraforming experts and companies from the Mars project) started its geoengineering projects to return sea levels to pre-anthropocene levels. But even after that Australia was still basically a 3rd world country. The US had maintained its precense there because of its strategic importance. Its very close to equitorial launch sites and the eventual space elevator that provided access to the New Guinea Orbital Command Station, and eventual greater pacific space battle groups, and it is one of the better staging points to operate in the Indian Ocean basin. So after the US ended up occupying the rest of Canada after the First Nations War of the 2060s, and was functionally the government of the United Kingdom and Ireland (who had been devistated by the flood and saw over 70% of their population emigrate to the US and Canada), it was decided that it would be easier to just annex these territories outright. Its known as of the 22nd Century as the Annexation of the Anglosphere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheTexasRanger [2014-11-17 02:47:00 +0000 UTC]
So what pacific isles are under US control and/or are states, I see that northern mariana islands and guam are still under US control.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to TheTexasRanger [2014-11-17 03:22:53 +0000 UTC]
Pretty much all of them. They're largely depopulated since most of them were abandoned during the rising sea levels of the mid 21st Century, so there's no great state of Pacific or anything like that. Guam almost got admitted as a state after Puerto Rico, but its back to being a territory after most of it was lost to the floods. Hawaii gained control of the Midway Islands and Johnson Atoll, and a number of islands that weren't transferred to Australia are under a Greater Pacific Insular Area.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Greavyard [2014-10-30 00:21:04 +0000 UTC]
GO BRASILIAN REICH GO
Thank you dud
Now remove hamburguer
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
menapia [2014-10-09 23:38:56 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Satoshi-Vampire190 [2014-07-19 22:24:05 +0000 UTC]
Wonderfulll More espeific...the Mexico rol in the external poltic....and his rol how "a new evil empire" or a new URSS....not very sure. mmmm I don´t what nation was of simlar actitude against US.
For othe sides...the situation of Brasil in the Africa-west, is similar to US in the middle orient (Israel ) mm o this is my view point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to Satoshi-Vampire190 [2014-07-19 23:26:14 +0000 UTC]
I don't mean to portray Mexico as evil, simply dynamic and disruptive to the established order crafted by the US-Alliance system.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gatemonger [2014-06-25 15:31:03 +0000 UTC]
How likely is it that nukes will be used in your war? What would drive that decision making process?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to gatemonger [2014-06-25 21:10:53 +0000 UTC]
Well the Mexican-American border is mined with tactical nukes on both sides, so I'm gonna say VERY likely. Strategic nukes aren't really a thing anymore though, as laser defense systems are now so good that anything big enough to carry a nuclear bomb will get shot out of the sky, and the US and Mexico have orbital weapons that are far more effective than simply vaporizing the enemy's entire society.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
microwavedreams [2014-06-18 01:57:09 +0000 UTC]
How close to collapse is Earth civilization? And what would you say is the largest threat that may cause it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to microwavedreams [2014-06-18 03:32:57 +0000 UTC]
Earth civilization is only a few decades away from collapse. Its stopped the bleeding in the 2080s, but that has led to stagnation. By the lage 2120s the planet will be in crisis mode as economies implode in on themselves as the planet reaches a kind of single world standard of living, that can't realistically be met, compounded by decades of stagflation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
microwavedreams In reply to YNot1989 [2014-06-18 04:27:40 +0000 UTC]
So is collapse where you are ultimately taking this timeline?
Or is that something I'm going to have to wait and see?
Truly this is a bittersweet "second renaissance"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jpalacio In reply to YNot1989 [2014-06-30 05:17:48 +0000 UTC]
is the USA collapse as well
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
microwavedreams [2014-06-15 23:47:02 +0000 UTC]
I remember you mentioning that the largest city in the US was Denver. Is that still the case? In fact, what are the top 5 largest cities in the US and world as a whole?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to microwavedreams [2014-06-16 06:58:20 +0000 UTC]
Denver is no longer the largest, that title now belongs to Dallas (Fort Hood was formally annexed by now).
---
Largest in the US
1. Dallas
2. Denver
3. New York
4. Los Angeles
5. Toronto
----
Largest in the World
1. Delhi
2. Mexico City
3. Beijing
4. Dallas
5. São Paulo
NOTE: New Richmond on Mars is the largest city in the Solar System.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
microwavedreams In reply to YNot1989 [2014-06-17 03:00:35 +0000 UTC]
About how many people does Dallas have? And has the massive urban sprawl between Philly, NYC and Boston made serious considerations to becoming a unified city?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to microwavedreams [2014-06-17 04:27:05 +0000 UTC]
Dallas has a population of about 26 million people, most other major world metroplexes have either declined or not grown much in population as more people head for the colonies, Tokyo isn't even in the top ten anymore. BosWash was more or less destroyed during the flooding of the 2030s and 40s, and after the sea levels returned to normal, those cities were individually restored, but much of the infill between them was rewilded.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
microwavedreams [2014-06-13 05:00:16 +0000 UTC]
So its pretty clear that war between the US and Mexico is inevitable. Where in relation to this war will your next map be? Before, during, or after?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to microwavedreams [2014-06-13 05:10:10 +0000 UTC]
The next map will be just prior to the outbreak of the war, and then I'll do a couple of more focused maps that take place during different phases of the war.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mplithid [2014-06-11 00:22:54 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, while I'm here I should ask if there's any potential for disintegration within the Polish Bloc? I looked up a map of the river systems of Europe and realized that the Polish Bloc has very few economic ties to Poland-proper. Its cohesiveness seems to rest mostly on its military strength (and intelligence services?) much like the USSR's did, and they seem to occupy eerily similar geographic positions (minus siberia).
Is the Bloc very economically prosperous or are they just more prosperous than Western Europe?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to mplithid [2014-06-11 05:44:24 +0000 UTC]
The Polish Bloc is a lot like the Soviet Union, but largely in this regard: It looks strong on the outside, but its one crisis away from falling apart on the inside. They're more prosperous than most, but in this era that's not saying much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mplithid [2014-06-10 23:42:28 +0000 UTC]
Why isn't India a dominant regional power on par with Brazil or Poland?
With Pakistan fragmented, I would expect it to extend its power over the subcontinent, influence Tibet as a buffer, and then commence to build a navy as much as possible since there would be no other regional powers to keep its attention focused on the subcontinent.
Its internal state divisions are chronic economic problems which prevent development. Have they become political problems? And if so, what has happened to that underlying vein of India nationalism that currently works as a countervailing force against regionalism? Has it simply weakened over time or has there been some kind of sea-change because of an intervening event?
Second question:
Has Mexico's influence over the other countries of the Rio de la Plata drainage basin created friction between it and Brazil or is Brazil simply biding its time, and if it is biding its time may I ask why it is doing so?
As always, great work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to mplithid [2014-06-11 05:42:27 +0000 UTC]
India is divided internally, and geographically isolated, with mountains to the North and West, Jungle everywhere else, and an ocean to its south that can only reach foreign markets by way of some very tight shipping corridors. India is a major power, but its greatest achievement of the 21st Century was becoming one of the main pools for immigrant labor and space colonists.
It helped fight the Turks in WWIII, but the US has been carful to ensure that China and Iran keep it in check, and India keeps them in check. Separatist sentiment has been growing in recent years, spurred by Mexico, and Indian Nationalism died out in the 2080s, largely due to generations of the nationalist era dying and the ease with which someone can set up a country thanks to modern technologies.
Brazil normally just plays Mexico and the US off of eachother, while carving a niche out for itself in the South Atlantic, but as of late Mexico and its allies have been making moves to try and support some separatist groups and revolutionaries in the region and in Brazil's core.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
microwavedreams [2014-06-08 18:44:55 +0000 UTC]
Does any country on earth have a growing population? And how many people does America have? How easy is space travel for the Average American?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YNot1989 In reply to microwavedreams [2014-06-09 04:06:46 +0000 UTC]
A number of countries have growing populations, but very slow growing. The US has about 650 million people living on Earth. Space travel is much easier for everyone, take a shuttle from your local air and space port, or ride up one of the six space elevators. Once you're in orbit, you can get around the solar system by a transport ship, or just wait for an O'Neil ship (O'Neil Cylinder-like spacecraft, many kilometers in length with an internal biosphere) to come past Earth and hook up with it until you arrive where you want to go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
QuantumBranching [2014-06-08 04:52:44 +0000 UTC]
This has been quite interesting so far. How is India doing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>