Comments: 28
KingsOfEvilArt [2018-05-17 12:50:37 +0000 UTC]
Blood for the blood god
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SpaceTaco101 [2016-09-26 11:58:48 +0000 UTC]
Indominus Rex 2.0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Calibersoul2012 [2015-09-04 23:22:44 +0000 UTC]
I highly doubt it was much of a predator. Newer findings have been more given light to the public
4.bp.blogspot.com/-S5-7dozCUCc…
The skull was supposedly found, and it looks like this
4.bp.blogspot.com/-S5-7dozCUCc…
That is more of a toothless, ducklike skull.
However, considering the lack of teeth it does not appear to be an animal capable of eating the tough plants that likely dominated its environment. I personally believe it had a diet similar to that of modern ducks:
birding.about.com/od/birdfeede…
As in it likely fed on small fish, aquatic plants, insects, perhaps some frogs and/or primitive mammals.
👍: 1 ⏩: 3
Calibersoul2012 In reply to Calibersoul2012 [2015-09-07 01:54:52 +0000 UTC]
For my first link, I meant to post this
saurian.blogspot.com/2013/04/n…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Calibersoul2012 In reply to Calibersoul2012 [2015-09-04 23:33:24 +0000 UTC]
Irony of this image is that if anything, deinocheirus was highly paranoid of tarbosaurus hunting it down and not vice-versa.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2015-08-02 14:07:45 +0000 UTC]
Ironically, it seems it wasn't a herbivore after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
grisador [2015-04-20 13:04:47 +0000 UTC]
Fanboys ? Nope !
But its a sad fact that they're right about the Animal İS an Omnivore...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Traheripteryx [2013-11-16 22:06:10 +0000 UTC]
Zu viele Deinocheiruszeichnungen in so kurzer Zeit bei DA! Uaaaaaaaah!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tyrannotitan333 [2013-11-03 22:12:21 +0000 UTC]
Where are the whining fanboys?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kazuma27 [2013-11-03 20:13:03 +0000 UTC]
... I bet there's something from Stephen King which would suit this quite nicely but i'm actually too horrified even to think properly.
Good night, everybody!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChrisMasna [2013-11-03 19:32:45 +0000 UTC]
INSTANT FAVE
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheMorlock [2013-11-03 19:21:57 +0000 UTC]
I thought it was a herbivore?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheMorlock In reply to yoult [2013-11-04 00:22:23 +0000 UTC]
I'm so confused. Is that link a joke too? This is the second time I've heard of this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QueenSerenity2012 In reply to TheMorlock [2013-11-04 01:56:36 +0000 UTC]
Yep, the REAL new specimens will be publicly described soon enough though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bubblekirby In reply to TheMorlock [2013-11-03 19:40:15 +0000 UTC]
I think it's supposed to be a joke
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RickRaptor105 [2013-11-03 19:07:35 +0000 UTC]
Moment mal, ein Schädel ist auch bekannt?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Tyrannotitan333 In reply to RickRaptor105 [2013-11-03 22:07:22 +0000 UTC]
According to Albertonykus there is a skull in a European collection that isn't the one that was stolen. He said it was complete enough to know that it was "weird", but he can't say much because he heard it from Holtz.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yoult In reply to RickRaptor105 [2013-11-03 19:13:09 +0000 UTC]
Na klar, aber der hier ist frei erfunden.^^
Was ich weiß ist, dass der Schädel groß ist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to yoult [2013-11-04 11:51:24 +0000 UTC]
Es würde aber schon einen Unterschied machen, ob der Schädel große Kiefer mit scharfen Zähnen oder einen Schnabel mit kleinen bis gar keinen Zähnen hat, und da es sich hier um einen Ornithomimosaurier handelt, ist letzteres wohl wahrscheinlicher.
Trotzdem bin ich froh, dass das Rätsel Deinocheirus innerhalb meiner Lebenszeit gelöst wurde.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1