Comments: 9
Pollux-Pictures [2010-02-22 13:19:43 +0000 UTC]
Interessanter Kontrast zwischen Dom und moderner Technik bei allen fΓΌnf Bildern. Ich finde dieses Bild hier am besten gelungen.
π: 0 β©: 1
CJSutcliffe [2009-03-08 15:56:06 +0000 UTC]
So, a top and tail arrangement as opposed to push pull? Interesting, especially with there being a cab car anyway, what would the need for another locomotive with raised pantographs be in this situation? Unless one loco had perhaps developed a technical problem which meant it was unable to proceed from a certain point. Did the train actually arrive in top and tail configuration?
π: 0 β©: 1
ZCochrane In reply to CJSutcliffe [2009-03-08 16:04:36 +0000 UTC]
I have no idea how the train arrived there, it was already there when I reached that platform. A possibility might be (but I'm just guessing here) that the cab car is defect and the 101 replaces it's function. There might be number of dead-end stations (I don't know, is there a more correct name for that in English? It'd just be "Kopfbahnhof", head station, for one where trains can't drive through, here) along the train's way so that just going around would take too long.
It could also be that either locomotive just had to be moved somewhere else and the engineer preferred both to be active for better acceleration, or that the train will get split in two heading into different directions somewhere along the line.
π: 0 β©: 1
CJSutcliffe In reply to ZCochrane [2009-03-08 19:52:19 +0000 UTC]
Dead end station or Kopfbahnhof is basically the same word for terminus, or terminal station from American English, a station that lies at the very end of a particular railway where the only way to proceed is by reversal or running round. Top and tail works to provide additional acceleration and quicker turnaround times with no cab car. However with a cab car and locomotive, the train is lighter and just as quick to turn around, however gets half the acceleration of a top and tail train. The defective cab car seems a more realistic scenario here, although the locomotive transport scenario cannot be ruled out totally, however thinking back on it, if the locomotive was defect, what was to stop them just changing the locomotive at the back?
π: 0 β©: 1
CJSutcliffe In reply to ZCochrane [2009-03-08 20:51:12 +0000 UTC]
Either way it is pretty out of the ordinary from what I've seen...
π: 0 β©: 0