HOME | DD

khamya9 In reply to Stick-bag [2014-09-06 05:25:10 +0000 UTC]

Probably a futa, but also probably not the first that bar early on had a lot of variety and I suspect one was in there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

khimru In reply to khamya9 [2014-09-06 16:12:26 +0000 UTC]

First bar had no characters from the LBSM universe (except for Miriam/Kay/Sadie trio and bouncer). These were all cross-over characters . We could only guess who's normally is in there when it's not occupied by cross-over characters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khamya9 In reply to khimru [2014-09-07 07:24:04 +0000 UTC]

which is totally irrelevant. The question is was anyone in that bar a futa, and we don't know for sure, but probably.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khimru In reply to khamya9 [2014-09-07 09:43:39 +0000 UTC]

It's relevant because we could not use pictures from said bar for anything. If futas are common in LBSM universe then they could have been in that bar or they could have been excluded for some reason.

One could say “we don't know for sure, but probably” about any unknown, it just means “we have no idea”, nothing more, nothing less.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khamya9 In reply to khimru [2014-09-08 02:49:41 +0000 UTC]

pictures from the car are in the comic, if they are cameos or not isn't relevant. and I said probably only because I'm too lazy to go back and check if anyone has a bulge visible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khimru In reply to khamya9 [2014-09-08 03:25:13 +0000 UTC]

pictures from the car are in the comic, if they are cameos or not isn't relevantReally? Does it mean that Bart now should be afraid of Daleks or Sith s?

Cameos are cameos, they have no bearings on the story. Not that it matters: they had no bulges anyway. Antenna's, tails and udders yes, bulges no.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khamya9 In reply to khimru [2014-09-10 06:12:09 +0000 UTC]

Considering we just had a story arc that included witches and winged monkeys, maybe.

The author of any piece of art can do anything they want with a cameo. Make it irrelevant, or relevant. Even change their mind down the road and take the other path.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khimru In reply to khamya9 [2014-09-10 09:29:56 +0000 UTC]

We've had a DREAM story arc which included witches and winged monkeys. There's a difference. These (and other) creatures are dreamed up by different people as often in our world as they are dreamed up in LBSM.

As I've said before : many many authors use their creative license to ignore laws of chemistry, math, physics, or even continuity , but Zdemian only does it sparingly in a few clearly outlined places (right now the only thing which is not possible in our world was these cool anti-gravity devices… bras , chairs , and, most recently, blitzball generator ), everything else makes total sense and continuity is not broken.

Of course it's still early in the comic: if it'll ever reach 1000th or 10 000th page then situation may become different, but till now everything was continually-correct. Yes, Zdemian have changed his mind at least once (as text under page   5 and page  6 clearly shows that Hostess was only supposed to reach 1 000 000cc initially yet she was blown up further to 10 000 000cc and then was used in such a form in the LBSC ), but that only happens when his former decision have not yet affected the story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

khamya9 In reply to khimru [2014-09-11 13:19:21 +0000 UTC]

and nothing in him using a cameo for more than just window dressing would break that. And whether or not he did, wouldn't change the fact that they are in the comic.

Again, I'm just saying that those characters did appear in the comic and might have been a futa. As it is, I take your word we can't tell. But whether or not they're his original characters, they still appeared. That's a simple fact. If one of them had been a futa it would have been the first such appearance in the comic. Not necessarily the first OC. But then, that was never the discussion. So it's not relevant if they are OCs or guest stars. Either way, they're on a page marked as part of the comic.

I'm not sure why you're so dead set that they're not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stick-bag In reply to khamya9 [2014-09-06 13:59:53 +0000 UTC]

Probably, but this seems to be the first one we can clearly see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0