Comments: 27
robjoeball1 [2011-11-11 21:18:06 +0000 UTC]
Cute, love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
utilityofnothing [2011-05-28 23:16:58 +0000 UTC]
it seems that by first presenting the cucumber, the eggs take new meaning. i am surprised no one else has mentioned this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
utilityofnothing In reply to missyhaitch [2011-07-22 05:40:04 +0000 UTC]
the model holds two eggs and a cucumber. tell me, with this juxtaposition the cucumber makes what of the eggs?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EndlesSstyle [2010-11-08 18:28:49 +0000 UTC]
that is one weird looking cucumber .. "^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CoreyByas [2010-03-17 04:42:49 +0000 UTC]
I love the set of these...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
u-27 [2010-03-07 21:30:11 +0000 UTC]
hahahaha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
morsi101 [2010-03-02 08:08:56 +0000 UTC]
cool!!! great idea...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gndrfck [2010-03-02 00:08:14 +0000 UTC]
I believe its enough to see jest the left short to understand the message)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zippythewildone In reply to gndrfck [2010-03-02 07:53:46 +0000 UTC]
While that may be true, it's more visually interesting for the composition to be balanced by a third part.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gndrfck In reply to zippythewildone [2010-03-02 08:03:32 +0000 UTC]
oh... god, i meant "right")) after midnight i frequently confuse hands ))
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
villamar In reply to gndrfck [2011-06-08 15:03:37 +0000 UTC]
Well... explain me? o.o Cuz I didn't get the message o_o ... I'm not kidding... OTL
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gndrfck In reply to villamar [2011-06-09 07:07:09 +0000 UTC]
it would be quite enough to show just the right piece to represent the oops-idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
villamar In reply to gndrfck [2011-06-13 07:55:33 +0000 UTC]
Maybe they wanted to show more than a simple "oops" but title couldn't be longer here o.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gndrfck In reply to villamar [2011-06-14 09:07:45 +0000 UTC]
frankly speaking there is nothing special to discuss in this picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
villamar In reply to gndrfck [2011-06-14 14:26:00 +0000 UTC]
Really? I think there's more messages on the pictures to the left.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gndrfck In reply to villamar [2011-06-15 04:30:54 +0000 UTC]
for example?)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zippythewildone In reply to gndrfck [2010-03-02 21:55:15 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I still think it's more interesting with all three parts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0