Comments: 9
luigibros234 [2012-11-27 15:18:53 +0000 UTC]
ϕ At last! A Phyrexian! ϕ
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bowtastic [2012-11-26 22:03:36 +0000 UTC]
Angry smiley face? Anyway I think I figured it out. You're gonna use Ral Zarek! The Izzet planeswalker ignored by many but still extremely badass!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zhantora In reply to bowtastic [2012-11-26 22:38:24 +0000 UTC]
The mark on its flank, if that's what you are asking about.
To be honest, I dont actually know a lot about Ral Zarek, I dont have any of the novels, nor did I play during the original Ravnica set. But could be interesting to read a bit about him, since he will most likely appear in Gatecrash or Dragon's Maze.
He is, however, not planned to appear in this set. For the moment, at least.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
phyrexianrevoker [2012-11-26 22:03:24 +0000 UTC]
WOW!
I like this one.
This is the kind of creature I most like (spells with legs).
This is pretty... simple for a rare.
What about increasing the cost to [2BB] and giving it the corruption ability?
Or make it cost [BBB] and be a 3/2.
I don't know. Just make it feel more like a rare.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zhantora In reply to phyrexianrevoker [2012-11-26 22:35:38 +0000 UTC]
I used Solemn Simulacrum as a "template" for this card, but I can see what you mean about being simple. I'll see if I can make it a bit more interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zhantora In reply to phyrexianrevoker [2012-11-28 09:58:37 +0000 UTC]
Updated with a changed mana cost, and having corruption 1, so that it is a bit more focused on black, but also somewhat useable for combat.
Another idea I had was giving it Evoke for 3BB, allowing it to be used entirely as a sorcery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
phyrexianrevoker In reply to Zhantora [2012-11-28 20:27:44 +0000 UTC]
Evoke is not a core set mechanic.
Which means that if you give evoke to one card in your set, you have to give evoke to more cards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0