Comments: 44
Insaze [2007-05-13 12:32:35 +0000 UTC]
BOKEH!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BerenSaelor [2007-03-20 13:19:31 +0000 UTC]
hübscj hübsch, erinnert mich irgendwie an Mäuschen aus "Muxmäuschenstill".
kennst du den film?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kashmir-Gr [2006-10-11 10:51:02 +0000 UTC]
pure beauty
starnge how monorcolour photos can be so detailed and full of emotions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MyPrivateParty [2006-07-14 01:00:02 +0000 UTC]
this is just classic. You can put all technicalities and rules aside. It's good however you look at it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mokman [2006-07-12 16:38:53 +0000 UTC]
I think it's a nice pic. she's got a great expression. I'd try a square crop, cutting off the grass at the bottom to see if you like that better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crappy [2006-07-10 10:39:40 +0000 UTC]
hit it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Supreme24 [2006-07-10 08:40:36 +0000 UTC]
Your right something just not right.
Brighter... but then the shirt and the lines.
Rotate maybe anything between 15-45 degrees but I think her being horizontal is best.
Crop maybe about 15% at bottom? nahh
I think there's to much blurred grass.Just a lil more grass in front of her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
seanfl [2006-07-09 06:10:38 +0000 UTC]
sharp.
looks good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
artgyrl [2006-07-09 03:12:38 +0000 UTC]
Lovely shot. I love the angle, and her expression is very welcoming.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zerocomplex [2006-07-09 01:42:41 +0000 UTC]
Too much blurred foreground, otherwise very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
blackpool [2006-07-08 23:57:43 +0000 UTC]
I dont' see a problem with the grass, the choice for wide open helped there... but a little brighter wouldn't hurt I guess. that leica is really a beast ahah
It's a good protrait.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GFXPunk In reply to zort [2006-07-08 22:57:56 +0000 UTC]
Then I suggest adding a little bit of yellow filter, widening the aperture by a stop and bringing down the exposure time by an appropriate amount.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to GFXPunk [2006-07-08 23:00:26 +0000 UTC]
please take the time and read the comment next to the shot - it says: 35/2 at f2... so i cant shoot more wide-open. i dont like filters tho.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GFXPunk In reply to zort [2006-07-08 23:19:14 +0000 UTC]
i meant in the dark room...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SubterfugeMalaises [2006-07-08 20:28:14 +0000 UTC]
I personally feel that shots on the grass, would look better in colour, most of em. Cause well, the green of the grass tends to compliment a picture. And when in b&w, green turns out to be flat, i think red does too cause of the colour temperture. Unlike like her white shirt, that pops out, which definitely save this shot, plus her beautiful bright smile. Her shirt looks more like a piece of cloth wrapped around her. Composition is fine, but i'd personally prefer a close up for her, as I said the green grass in black and white, makes it look flat, although there is the depth there, it just doesn't seem to work.
It is however, a spontaneous shot. If you were to prolly do what I mentioned above, it wouldn't look spontaneous, rather set up. It's fine just as it is. If this was a shot of me, I wouldn't mind having it up on my wall. And that is what matters. Can't be perfect all the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to SubterfugeMalaises [2006-07-08 21:35:56 +0000 UTC]
not sure whats wrong with the grey-grass. still, i shot a roll of reala too.
well, getting closer is impossible with an m as the min focus distance is 0.7 m - an slr feature i miss sometimes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SubterfugeMalaises In reply to zort [2006-07-08 23:25:29 +0000 UTC]
Hehe, i'm just being picky. I've noticed grass (green) seems to mellow down when its in grayscale. It kinda takes away, uhh, the contrast so to say. Not that its a big problem, but it shows in this shot, cause a major part of this photo takes it up. Okay, shall stop here, to much talk about grass.
Ah yeah, focusing distance, that is why I like my crappy 18-55mm kit lens. Haha. Well, in the end, we've just gotta work around with whatever limitations we have. Sometimes these limitations bring out the best.
Heh. Kay, stop preaching now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
claytes [2006-07-08 16:03:17 +0000 UTC]
that m6 sure does look purdy!! what? there's a girl in the shot?? oh...
serious. i think the crop cuts her off awkwardly. there is much dead space (which is fine if used right), her, and then more dead space. no flow and no reason for the composition. portrait crop might've been more appealing here. if you wanted the dead space perhaps you coul've used it to the left of her or something. just my thoughts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Suzage [2006-07-08 15:01:20 +0000 UTC]
Mmmmmm6! Gor_geous_ bokeh!
And just overall such an amazing atmosphere, so free and airy.
I think I'd have took this shot horizontally... but I kinda like it to see it like this, because it makes me think out of the box, you know?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
joejoesmoe [2006-07-08 14:25:41 +0000 UTC]
Nein, ich denke, dass das Foto die Art fein ist, wie es ist. Es gibt kein Bedürfnis, zu rotieren oder sich aufzuhellen. Sie taten einen guten Job. Nette Arbeit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chaosbeyond [2006-07-08 13:20:04 +0000 UTC]
Great perspective.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
masteroftherealm [2006-07-08 13:04:40 +0000 UTC]
Great Bokeh!
Lovely lens.
Lovely shot.
She looks so happy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kinderschokolade [2006-07-08 12:30:16 +0000 UTC]
ich hätte ihre haare leicht angeschnitten und mehr von oben in den frame genommen. überhaupt finde ich photos im gras immer recht anspruchsvoll wenn man b/w schießt, da man umdenken muss das die wiese sogar störend wirken kann wenn sie in eine graue masse übergeht... ist mir aufgefallen das solche photos in farbe immer besser kommen *shrug*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to kinderschokolade [2006-07-08 12:49:48 +0000 UTC]
ja, die haare etwas anschneiden wär sicher besser gewesen.
hab auch einen reala verschossen... mal sehen, was da drauf ist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
djmirage [2006-07-08 12:29:37 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps try to rotate it a bit, so her eyes are in a straight line.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0