Raygreens In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2014-03-12 21:52:09 +0000 UTC]

yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Raygreens [2014-03-12 22:43:35 +0000 UTC]

So I heard you think Lance is asexual...that's a very neat way to think of it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2014-03-12 23:07:29 +0000 UTC]

thanks, just something about him makes me think he's asexual. But anything is good as long as they don't put him with ILana (it would be refreshing to see a boy/girl pair that DOESN'T hook up, and Lance doesn't seem like somebody interested in politics if he became king). I feel like getting the show back on air at this point is impossible, but I think it's possible to either get a movie or more likely, a comic book series. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Raygreens [2014-03-12 23:38:12 +0000 UTC]

I know, right? You know, technically Ilanca is incest since they're supposed to be siblings...

Anyway, I took the show under my wing, as part of a series of crossovers including Fusionfall. Ilana is pretty much still a pseudo-feminist, but Lance has a less-defined Gender Role. I developed an OC for his love interest...but unlike the notorious mary-sues, she (yes, she) still connects with Lance even though she often wears the pants in the relationship.

Personally, I think the people running the revival movement have no idea how to do it. They're blind fools whose actions hardly got their show on Toonami (that was more about their tight budget), whereas the efforts I encouraged helped make Stuart Snyder and Anne Sweeney decide to resign.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2014-03-13 00:43:10 +0000 UTC]

what exactly were your efforts? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Raygreens [2014-03-13 00:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Just letting people get the big picture, so they can support what they like for the right reasons. It's the good, the bad, and the ugly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2014-03-13 01:22:33 +0000 UTC]

so by telling people to get the big picture, you got two executives to quit? What exactly is this big picture?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Raygreens [2014-03-13 20:40:39 +0000 UTC]

Well...www.change.org/petitions/carto…

And people say I don't know anything about bringing back a show.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2014-03-14 00:37:36 +0000 UTC]

But the show had already been off the air for over a year y the time they resigned, so the new guy wouldn't see much of a reason to put the show back on. What would need to be done is convince the network that bring back SBT would be a good investment(which is very difficult). But even with all that in mind, Genndy had a falling-out with the network so even if they did want to bring the show back, Genndy would probably not want to work with them. All in all, our best chances is to get a comic book made of the show. That way at least the story can breathe and offer a more satisfying ending. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Raygreens [2014-03-14 00:46:38 +0000 UTC]

Profit is an important reason, but Titan wasn't one o the selected shows for IDW's comics. Titan's only on Toonami because it's cheap to air, and that's why they get the 5:30 death timeslot.

I talked about some ways Titan would inevitable change, like here fusion-bioformer.deviantart.co…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to crocodilerocker [2013-09-19 20:51:37 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Chubbygirlspictures [2013-08-30 15:16:20 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Size-And-Stupidity [2013-07-30 18:15:25 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to moondragonwings [2013-07-17 19:54:51 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to majorkerina [2013-06-01 14:58:53 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to thormemeson [2013-01-27 16:34:48 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to DisneyMaster [2012-10-09 02:34:15 +0000 UTC]

well I like it the way it is, but what kind of changes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DisneyMaster In reply to Raygreens [2012-10-09 02:54:06 +0000 UTC]

Well I relized that she wasn't wearing a bra in stages 3 & 4 and I also altered her pubes in stage 6 so it will match up to this nude version I have planned.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to DisneyMaster [2012-10-09 20:38:01 +0000 UTC]

ok, but if you do it nude it still still have a vagina even as a boy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DisneyMaster In reply to Raygreens [2012-10-09 23:09:35 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to General-Kel [2012-07-28 18:43:23 +0000 UTC]

don't you mean "feliz cumpleanos! And gracias.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

General-Kel In reply to Raygreens [2012-07-28 18:48:29 +0000 UTC]

Oh yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Size-And-Stupidity [2012-07-28 18:12:13 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to superskeetospro [2012-07-28 16:41:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Nascarruler519 [2012-07-28 16:41:26 +0000 UTC]

thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Saie2358 [2012-07-02 00:54:27 +0000 UTC]

I am, my great uncle used to collect stuff like that in his prime. Now it's in our garage as we look for a collector of stuff like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Saie2358 In reply to Raygreens [2012-07-02 12:20:36 +0000 UTC]

oh ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to majorkerina [2012-06-13 15:25:11 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

majorkerina In reply to Raygreens [2012-06-14 12:01:09 +0000 UTC]

Also, sorry for the thanks being rather late. I haven't had a chance to go through my messages for a long time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Raygreens In reply to majorkerina [2012-06-14 12:51:31 +0000 UTC]

no problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raygreens In reply to Comickpro [2012-06-01 11:58:37 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0