TobiasAmaranth In reply to ZS3 [2013-08-19 00:22:15 +0000 UTC]

Existing on that place called FurAffinity. ^_^;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZS3 In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2013-08-19 01:57:45 +0000 UTC]

Thought so. That was quite a long time to respond.

And I barely see any art from you! I miss the good ol' days...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to NoelleMBrooks [2013-02-18 05:37:53 +0000 UTC]

Well I sent you a note here right after I sent you a note on Youtube cuz I typed your account name straight to here. So unless I was being watched before, I don't thiiiiiink so. Hmms. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NoelleMBrooks In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2013-02-18 21:28:54 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, the note. Sorry, I had forgotten to respond, but that's how I had run into you. See, I give llamas to every user I come across, so when I found your account and saw I had already given you a llama, I was slightly confused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to princevulpine [2012-09-19 19:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Fable has brought that up before, particularly about your tiger image, but also overall. That's why a furry shirt would have to be submitted as a Daily. Woot undoubtedly realizes that a large enough portion of its fanbase is furries. I go to a convention like Furry Fiesta and I see dozens and dozens of Woot shirts. It's like it's Woot Shirt Con. I have one anthro furry idea that Fable will probably try eventually, involving elegant dance. We'll see how long it takes her to get to it, though, and if Woot accepts the idea.

In the mean time, definitely keep submitting dailies, and throw the occasional full anthro one into the mix. Keep it tasteful and potentially with a point to the anthro but they need to print at least something. (Also, yay foxes ) *Fox obsessed*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

princevulpine In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2012-09-21 18:43:25 +0000 UTC]

I have a Pirate Panda design contracted out from Woot, they'll print in a few weeks. But yeah, dailies really seem like the way to go. I think quick and simple is often the best bet for dailies, keep it simple to print and make it snappy!
I'm not a huge fan of the new derby rules. I think it's gonna come back and bite them in the butt. Did you see that first place this week only had 505 votes! I had 6th place a couple years ago with 614 votes! I think it should go back to prints by votes, but then a guest editor for Monday's print...
Yeah, Foxes rule!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TobiasAmaranth In reply to princevulpine [2012-09-23 06:34:53 +0000 UTC]

The votes have been dying long before they switched formats. Several first places were under 600 before the switch. The current problem is that the fog of 9 is entirely unnecessary with these new rules. A fog of 4 would work better again. To be honest, I think they should advertise the need for creative daily entries because there's been a lot lately that have just been BLAH. But hey, I scored a new fox shirt!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

princevulpine In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2012-09-24 17:36:39 +0000 UTC]

To true. Today's isn't bad and the fox shirt the other day was awesome. I have been trying to keep my dailies simple. The one that they picked to print was changed 8 times before they pulled to trigger on it. It started out kinda baddass, but then I had to simplify and cutsy it to the point of unrecognition. What can I say, when they are willing to give you a chance at $1000 by making changes, I did it. money's money.
I want to sub at least one daily a week. And I will make some simple and some more fancy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Silkeyn [2010-08-07 01:43:15 +0000 UTC]

Wutt? O.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Silkeyn In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2010-08-09 14:46:42 +0000 UTC]

Not your birthday? Then...Happy UN-birthday! ...ewww, that sounds like that unbirthing fetish, so...unbirthday as in the mad hatter meaning XD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to lover-of-the-Drow [2010-04-03 20:11:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. That Werewolf project was really fun to work on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lover-of-the-Drow In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2010-04-05 05:55:04 +0000 UTC]

It looks like it ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to secoh2000 [2009-05-13 05:55:39 +0000 UTC]

Ehh? Wutt? O.o;;;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secoh2000 In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2009-05-13 17:53:27 +0000 UTC]

*poke poke*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TobiasAmaranth In reply to secoh2000 [2009-05-13 19:12:28 +0000 UTC]

*falls over dead*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secoh2000 In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2009-05-16 03:50:58 +0000 UTC]

nooooooo's!!! O.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Henaru [2009-04-12 18:44:15 +0000 UTC]

Charlie was changing all along, I'm telling you. He knew that he was pretty much screwed with Laila. Also, dog catchers are an ultimate evil, and Romeo couldn't really just sit and watch, since he views Charlie as a little slow but not completely undeserving.

Yeah, it's a stretch I suppose, but it works out. Ending is definitely my least favorite set of scenes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to KotkaMroku [2007-11-01 19:51:49 +0000 UTC]

*huggles back* I'm not one for the chains, but I appreciate the thought

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Mewstor [2007-11-01 19:51:29 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, cool :3 I forget to check these things XD Thanks for the pounce. Cya around and such ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Renatwo [2007-09-07 03:15:15 +0000 UTC]

Yep! *laughs*

Wait what? XD This message is older than my reply on the other! The sense-making, it fails!!

So do you spend much time online nowadays or are you the same reclusive feline as always?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to KotkaMroku [2007-08-24 05:11:30 +0000 UTC]

Guess what? ... *keeps you in suspense till MSN tomorrow* ;3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Yitsvon-the-yoktaro [2007-08-21 07:26:34 +0000 UTC]

>___>;;

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to kerol [2007-08-21 07:26:26 +0000 UTC]

Yes indeed! Now get back to them artses! ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Kitsune-Knight [2007-08-21 07:26:14 +0000 UTC]

*GASP* I shall likely need to chat at some point. Though that is an uncertainty and a mystery. Or something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to Aelius24 [2007-08-21 07:25:45 +0000 UTC]

Nuuu! There's no need for that! @_@

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aelius24 In reply to TobiasAmaranth [2007-08-21 16:31:53 +0000 UTC]

No worries, mate

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasAmaranth In reply to SkyWhiteFox [2007-08-21 07:25:32 +0000 UTC]

I had the urge to become one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1