HOME | DD

Androklos — Emperor Heraclius

#heraclius #romanempire #byzantineempire
Published: 2016-11-04 23:09:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 1416; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description Picture of Flavius Heraclius Augustus (c. 575- 11 february 641) was the emperor of Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire (from 610-641) and founder of Heraclian dynasty (610- 711, ended with Justinian II. Rhinotmetos/ Slit-nosed).

Heraclius was responsible for introducing greek as the official language for the empire (they used greek already,however in official circles was still dominand latin). His rise to power began in 608 when he and his father (also Heraclius,the exarch ((governor)) of Africa) led a revolt against unpopular emperor Phocas.

When Heraclius came to power the empire was threatened on multiple frontiers. Immediately took charge of Byzantine forces against Sassanid Persia. The war's (602-628) first battles ended in defeat for Romans. The Persians managed to capture defacto whole eastern side of the empire and only impenetrable walls of Constantinople were able to stop the invasion. However Byzantine navy was strong (with help of secret weapon of Greek fire ((fire what burned on water)) managed to repel the invaders. Soon after this Heraclius reformed,rebuild and strengthen the military forces. Drove Persians out of Asia Minor (nowdays Turkey) and pushed deep into their territory,defeating them decisively in 627 at the battle of Niniveh. The Persian king Khosrau II. was overthrown and executed by his son Kavadh II, who wanted peace and agreed to withdraw from all occupied territory.

However Heraclius soon experienced a new threat. In 629,the Islamic prophet Muhammad succeeded in unifying all the nomadic tribes of the Arabian Peninsula. Those tribes had previously been too divided to pose a serious challenge to both-Persians and Romans. Now unified by their new religion they comprised one of the most powerful states in the region. 
First conflict against Byzantines was in 629-battle of Mu'tah. Small skirmish forces attacked Roman army and were easily repulsed,because of this there was no apparent reason to strenght borders. Also Romans had little preceding battlefield experience with Arabs ,even the Strategicon of Maurice (manual of war,praised for the variety of enemies it covers)  does not mention warfare against Arabs at all.
In 630 marched Arabian forces and conquered lands in Levant. In battle of Yarmouk (636) resulted crushing defeat of the larger Byzantine army and within 3 years,the Holy Land was once again lost. By the time Heraclius' death in Constantinople,most of Egypt had fallen. In his last moments Heraclius thought he was abandonned by God.

Accomplishments: Although the territorial gains produced by his defeat of Persians were lost to Muslim conquest, Heraclius still ranks among the greatest Roman emperors. His reforms and government reduced corruption, reorganized military with great success. Ultimately, the reformed Imperial army halted Muslims in Asia Minor and Carthage (nowdays Tunis) for another 60 years,saving core provinces and strenghted borders.

For recovering True Cross from Persian hands and reclaiming Holy Land is unnoficially known as the First Crusader.

Heraclius tried to repair the schism in Christian church in regard to Monophysites, The Church of the East (Nestorians) thus made Monothelitism doctrine. Eventually, however, this project of unity was rejected by all sides.

Family: Heraclius was married twice-first to Fabia Eudokia and then to his niece Martina. He had two children with Fabia and atleast nine with Martina,most of whom were sickly.
Two of his children would become emperors: Heraclius Constantine (Constantine III,son from Fabia Eudokia.) and Constantine Heraclius (Heraklonas,Martina's son).
 
Related content
Comments: 13

NikosBoukouvalas [2016-11-05 21:23:10 +0000 UTC]

Nice sketch of a glorious emperor! I like the eyes you gave him: kind yet tired... One suggestion I have would be to make his weist (especially the part bellow the belt) wider because it looks a bit awkward. It is also an unspoken law among artists to never cut the portrait at wrists' length, because it would look as if someone cut off the model's hands. I say you have him hold his sword/staff and a globus cruciger to avoid this issue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

NikosBoukouvalas In reply to NikosBoukouvalas [2016-11-06 11:53:31 +0000 UTC]

True. But if you want to, you can send the whole sketch to me via sendspace and I'll clear the stain for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Androklos In reply to NikosBoukouvalas [2016-11-05 21:50:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly ^^ and i know however it needed to be cutted since lower parts were...ehm.. damaged by dropped drink,hence it looked really weird-desperate times needs desperate actions

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NikosBoukouvalas In reply to Androklos [2016-11-05 22:03:48 +0000 UTC]

I see. Do you have photoshop? If so you can play around with the "black and white" tool and get rid of stains easily.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Androklos In reply to NikosBoukouvalas [2016-11-05 23:01:24 +0000 UTC]

Sadly i don't have it. But there's always chance i make and reupload/edit new version  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hashashin619 [2016-11-05 06:26:38 +0000 UTC]

One of his greatest accomplishments was saving of Greek culture and language, Heraclius wasn't one of the most successful warrior Roman emperors but he was doubtlessly the most respected one, even his enemies Arabs and Pesians have spoken highly of him!
Great job btw ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Androklos In reply to Hashashin619 [2016-11-05 09:32:41 +0000 UTC]

I think only 'problem' with Heraclius was that he lived too long. If he would die before Muslim conquest he'd be praised as great general too (since he managed to take back previously lost territories from Sassanid Persia). However i'm very glad Arabs and Persians respected his reign (specially Persians,since we know they usually hated Roman emperors ).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hashashin619 In reply to Androklos [2016-11-05 10:53:38 +0000 UTC]

Well, to be fair Roman army was really exhausted due to long lasting wars against Persia. On the other side the Arabs had at the time highly capable political and military leaders.
Khalid ibn al Walid the commander in chief of the Muslim army could be considered the greatest millitary commander in Arab history and probabely one of the greatest of all time in history of the world, i guess any other Roman general or Emperor woul have had a lot of problems dealing with him.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Androklos In reply to Hashashin619 [2016-11-05 12:01:13 +0000 UTC]

Indeed ^^ Arabs won fair and square,no doubts. However part of me is kinda sorry that Sassanid Empire collapsed under presure of their conquest. Would be really fascinating if Islam 'stayed' in Arabian peninsula ,what could happend to Persia after. Maybe Zoroastrianism would be still 'living' religion. Or after neverending warfare with Romans, Persians would fell to another conquerors like did with Arabs. However it's really interesting topic for 'what if' scenarios.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hashashin619 In reply to Androklos [2016-11-05 14:05:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it's a very interesting topic of alternate history, what if Persia stayed Zoroastrian.
considering the regional and global role of Persia in different era, it would have change the history of world tremendously.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AndrewDent [2016-11-05 00:04:12 +0000 UTC]

He's got the swag!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Androklos In reply to AndrewDent [2016-11-05 09:26:48 +0000 UTC]

Naturally XD byzantine's armors/clothes are always so fabulous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndrewDent In reply to Androklos [2016-11-05 10:33:46 +0000 UTC]

Precisely XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0