Comments: 109
archambers In reply to ??? [2016-05-11 22:35:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much. If you are interested, I have much more on my other website. You can even buy prints of this piece and many others not on deviant art. andrew-chambers.pixels.com/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KuLLerMieTze [2013-08-29 15:07:21 +0000 UTC]
wow! i´m impressed! beautiful work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rebelflowers [2012-10-08 18:06:18 +0000 UTC]
THIS is just fantastic!! I love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rebelflowers In reply to archambers [2012-10-10 20:52:59 +0000 UTC]
These are really, very good. I look forward to see the new work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bookstoresue [2012-09-24 13:03:53 +0000 UTC]
ohh LOVE IT! Great work, lovely use of color
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yudaev [2012-07-26 23:33:05 +0000 UTC]
Time of painting were not spend for nothing there. - We have uncommon balance between tasty flesh and rebel move to painterly Utopy. May be inner conflict of this two will armed you up to grab the core of new dramaturgy of Noble-Dame-Painting.
In any case, my congratulations with a juicy piece of prey, Andrew !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KiLLERdjay2k15 [2012-07-04 21:38:12 +0000 UTC]
Looks pretty cool. Fantastic colors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Octonomoes [2012-01-05 20:51:25 +0000 UTC]
That texture looks just like something I'm working on...and, like you, I'm having a hard time making it work. But I think the problem is more with my struggle to control it than the texture itself. I usually just put down my brushes and walk away for a couple days or months. I usually come up with something, eventually... What really gripes me is when I come back a month later and it still kicks my ass. But in spite of your struggles, this piece does seem to be working.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gasworks [2011-11-17 17:28:29 +0000 UTC]
The textures! The textures!
Outstanding work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
secretplanet [2011-06-28 21:53:23 +0000 UTC]
bugger Moore, Mucha, & the rest: this is really amazing cos it's so unique! i've never seen a figure painting like it, & it looks great! love all the colour & texture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
archambers In reply to secretplanet [2011-06-29 18:58:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the comment. I really think this was a breakthrough piece for me. I have several more in the works similar to this. I can't wait to get back in the studio and start painting again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
janamarie [2011-05-16 06:00:53 +0000 UTC]
This is brilliant. I love the colors, she's gorgeous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
archambers In reply to janamarie [2011-05-17 15:33:17 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the kind words. I really think this is a breakthrough piece for me. I'll be pursuing this style and technique more when I get back into the studio.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DracoAlbastru [2011-03-31 13:20:44 +0000 UTC]
excellent work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Octonomoes [2011-03-27 08:31:55 +0000 UTC]
I do believe you've got something going here, and you should pursue it. Be careful about the Nagel influence, though...even though I like his work as an illustrator, his slickness was what made him popular in Playboy. You obviously have a love of texture, and I'm not sure that Nagel is a good fit, in that regard. I'm certainly interested in seeing what you will do with Futurism in your nudes. That has always been one of my favorite movements, and have used it a lot in the past with nudes, especially with sexual fetishism. However, I'm finding that, in my own work, the aggressive, free-form presence of texture and the cool structure of futurism (and cubism, it's father) are not exactly a match made in heaven. Which is exactly why it must be attempted. I'll be watching...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Octonomoes In reply to archambers [2011-03-29 21:42:55 +0000 UTC]
I wondered why I didn't recall much about Divisionism in 3 years of Art History (except that Seurat called his own work that), so I did some reading...It seems Divisionism in its original form was not a viable philosophy because its conservative technique did not jibe with its radical politics. It died on the vine in just a few years, also because Italy's repressive regime at the time made the artists' lives rather difficult. While it is true that Divisionism in it's true form was alive before Cubism, it also effectively died before Cubism. It was Boccioni, among others, who used Cubism to revive Divisionism, but in the process reshaped it into a completely different animal, both technically and philosophically. While I can accept that Cubism was not in the lineage of Divisionism, I would still hold that it was it's Stepfather....wow...I haven't written that much about Art History in 20 years...I'm exhausted.
Oh, and I am familiar with Mr. Thewes work...we actually faved each other some time ago...I agree, he is brilliant! I'm glad you reminded me of him. I revisited his page, with much pleasure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
archambers In reply to Octonomoes [2011-03-30 17:01:59 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, I love art geek talk. I don't get any of this from my fellow truck drivers! LOL!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DarkGoddess137 [2011-03-10 13:50:13 +0000 UTC]
I can't believe the movement, colors, and detail going on in this thing! it's just breathtaking. You can really tell that you put a lot of time and effort into it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SultryStax [2011-01-13 03:53:23 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
archambers In reply to SultryStax [2011-01-13 19:32:08 +0000 UTC]
That is what your painting will look like. At least similar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HReidStudios [2010-10-12 19:31:24 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful, I love your line work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lifeforceinsoul [2010-02-21 01:34:56 +0000 UTC]
Sorry I didn't reply to use question - my shots of HENRY MOORE's sculptures where in around his home Perry Green.
Your painting kindsof reminds me of De Kooning's expression; the woman figure, hugely inflated with a spirit of abstraction mad-painting in full surrounding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
N-M-S-15 [2009-11-15 02:21:28 +0000 UTC]
It's compelling though I'm not entirely certain how I feel about it. The vivid color and the dimensions are intense, yet the expression seems off, and terribly out of place.....
But.... It's unique. It gets a response. Well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tsxworld [2008-07-18 05:15:20 +0000 UTC]
amazing piece of art : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hermitsrme [2008-07-18 02:14:49 +0000 UTC]
love the colours and texture
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LimeGreenSquid [2008-05-27 04:07:19 +0000 UTC]
Wow, beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BaronMofo [2008-01-21 13:51:05 +0000 UTC]
excellent technique and outcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>