Comments: 55
narcosaurus In reply to ??? [2022-08-06 18:23:39 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
Wolfman3200 [2020-03-15 07:13:09 +0000 UTC]
That poor lion is going to get eaten.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Corallianassa [2020-02-06 14:53:12 +0000 UTC]
dear frien scot
why skull have holes and horn behind the eye and brown lip
very strange reconstractionΒ
thanks in advance
π: 0 β©: 2
Corallianassa In reply to TheWatcherofWorlds [2020-02-06 16:51:44 +0000 UTC]
tis a joke
but no, these holes are the cause of a bone-eating disease that birds also get.
π: 0 β©: 0
TheWatcherofWorlds In reply to Batavotyrannus [2020-02-06 17:24:47 +0000 UTC]
Is it called Jaw bone cavitation?
Im reading it now and it says its a condition when the bone doesnt get enough of a blood supply.
π: 0 β©: 0
TheWatcherofWorlds In reply to Batavotyrannus [2020-02-06 17:23:38 +0000 UTC]
ITS REAL!?
I thought that was a meme from some guy here that they were marks of a parasite.
π: 0 β©: 1
Saiyanstrong [2018-11-23 18:12:51 +0000 UTC]
Did you know that discovered an even big T.rex?
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Saiyanstrong [2018-11-23 19:20:36 +0000 UTC]
I'm afraid I don't quite understand the question.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Saiyanstrong In reply to Batavotyrannus [2018-11-23 19:40:24 +0000 UTC]
They discovered an incomplete T.rex skeleton that is estimated to be far larger than Sues.
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Saiyanstrong [2018-11-24 10:26:56 +0000 UTC]
There's a supposed one of those every year or so. They always turn out smaller.
π: 1 β©: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to Batavotyrannus [2020-02-07 00:00:55 +0000 UTC]
scotty, from what I hear he's just SLIGHTLY bigger than sue.
π: 0 β©: 2
Jdangerousdinosaur In reply to Taliesaurus [2020-02-07 00:54:03 +0000 UTC]
Scotty and Sue are both pretty much the same size i.imgur.com/B3CQnnwg.jpgΒ its just Scotty has larger and thicker weight bearing elements such as its femur hips and shoulder bones. Scotty does surpass Sue in quite a few measurements Fran did do a spreadsheet that listed all the skeletal elements where Scotty surpassed Sue but I can't locate it at the mo.
π: 0 β©: 1
Strick67 [2018-02-23 23:14:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, she's a big girl (if female at all).
π: 0 β©: 1
Stolpergeist [2018-01-28 22:10:16 +0000 UTC]
Guess it died
π: 0 β©: 1
Dinogeek2207 [2018-01-08 11:51:38 +0000 UTC]
Prachtig, damn wat moet sue een gezicht zijn geweest toen ze nog leefde
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Dinogeek2207 [2018-01-08 15:34:16 +0000 UTC]
Lijkt me ook zeer indrukwekkend, als je kijk naar wat dieren als leeuwen en tijgers al allemaal voor een krachtpatsers zijn...
π: 0 β©: 1
Dinogeek2207 In reply to Batavotyrannus [2018-01-08 15:38:18 +0000 UTC]
Een groep tyrannosaurussen lijkt me het dichtste wat het mesozoicum bij biologische terreur kwam, 1 rex ok 2-6 rexen nee bedankt
π: 0 β©: 1
Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-12-27 12:21:41 +0000 UTC]
Dit doet me ergens wel twijfelen aan dat hele "grote theropoden zouden mensen niet aanzien als prooi omdat ze te klein zijn" gedoe.
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-12-27 13:58:39 +0000 UTC]
Ja daar klopt waarschijnlijk niks van, we zijn minder moeite dan 99% van grotere prooien.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to Batavotyrannus [2017-12-27 21:54:04 +0000 UTC]
Ik dacht het al. Ik bedoel, het is nu niet dat we zeer snelle lopers zijn die veel energie vragen om te gegeten te kunnen worden.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-12-27 22:36:15 +0000 UTC]
En het grootste deel van grotere prooien als Edmontosaurus zouden ze toch nooit op krijgen.
π: 0 β©: 0
kirkseven [2017-12-27 01:32:11 +0000 UTC]
No.
π: 0 β©: 1
Evodolka [2017-12-26 18:18:49 +0000 UTC]
smaller than i thought
π: 0 β©: 1
Batavotyrannus In reply to Evodolka [2017-12-26 18:32:39 +0000 UTC]
It is ~144cm long, charts like this make stuff look a lot smaller than it does irl.
π: 0 β©: 2
Corallianassa In reply to Batavotyrannus [2017-12-26 18:35:45 +0000 UTC]
I thought SueΒ΄s skull was like 1.53-1.58 m when uncrushed, with 1.44m being the crushed state it is in.
π: 0 β©: 2
TheBatmeme368 In reply to Corallianassa [2018-06-19 22:58:59 +0000 UTC]
Reconstructions differ, and there are some in that ballpark, others tend to favour the 144 cm figure.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>