Comments: 215
amidarosa [2011-01-19 14:49:00 +0000 UTC]
how did u make it double exposure?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pyramax [2010-08-13 05:00:55 +0000 UTC]
may i pretty please draw this. i will link it to this image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nine9nine9 [2010-04-29 21:16:37 +0000 UTC]
Very creative! Featured in my 4-29-10 Journal of great DA artworks [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
whothennow24 [2009-10-29 03:39:47 +0000 UTC]
After looking at this for about a minute, I decided I dig.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Irv-Ing [2009-10-23 20:00:14 +0000 UTC]
Wow, looks great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iamdallas [2009-06-25 21:06:17 +0000 UTC]
this is sooo amazingly wonderful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cometa-Guavaberry [2009-03-06 05:07:36 +0000 UTC]
Wow Looks fantastic !
I really like how the 2 images blend
Its like a new version of the technique they used in the BAUHAUS, where they combined images in fotosensible paper
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aoife [2008-09-09 22:03:55 +0000 UTC]
This has been featured here
xo
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Black-Crusader In reply to kho13 [2008-07-23 16:46:48 +0000 UTC]
no its a double exposure.
thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
neprelucrat [2008-07-21 19:52:48 +0000 UTC]
hey! you are featured here : [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gumbiey [2008-07-12 04:19:31 +0000 UTC]
awww sick!!! mx!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VoodooChild11 [2008-07-09 02:07:42 +0000 UTC]
Fabulous. The work of a Holga?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sam-plant In reply to Black-Crusader [2008-06-13 22:09:16 +0000 UTC]
he looks so much like how i think i look
xxxxxxxx
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
electric-space [2008-05-23 01:55:15 +0000 UTC]
it looks like a boy i used to know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EylulAslan [2008-05-03 21:12:43 +0000 UTC]
Is it possible to see the other pic with the building?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Black-Crusader In reply to EylulAslan [2008-05-04 10:47:23 +0000 UTC]
They are one shot im afraid you cant seperate a double exposure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EylulAslan In reply to Black-Crusader [2008-05-04 13:57:41 +0000 UTC]
Ah sorry,i should have read the artist's comment part.
:/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MADjaHEAD [2008-04-01 22:44:47 +0000 UTC]
One can find it strange but I like such low quality spontaneous double exposure shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>