HOME | DD
BullMoose1912 — Reactionaries Demotivational
Published: 2011-10-25 16:52:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 6164; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 189
Redirect to original
Description
You know those really stupid YouTube comments and Urban Dictionary definitions that make you lose all faith in the good of humanity and make you exclaim, "I don't want to live on this planet anymore!" and make you fantasize about building a colony on Mars free of idiots? Or is that just me? Chances are that those people are what are called "reactionaries," far-right, paranoid, and just plain stupid people who advocate for a return to the stone age in terms of social progress, often with a fascist authoritarian government.They're known for saying such things as:
"Get back in the kitchen!"
"I wish Hitler had won!"
"Obama's a communist fascist neo-nazi Muslim!"
"Go back to Africa and take your AIDS with you!"
"ur a faget go kll urslf" [sic]
Books Reactionaries like to read:
The Turner Diaries
Mein Kampf
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Hunter
Any book published by Paladin Press
Things Reactionaries like:
Guns
Booze (except for wine because it's for liberal commies)
The Bible
Jesus (don't tell them he was a socialist)
The Tea Party
Meat
Alex Jones, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and other far-right pundits
Gold
America (as it was before the Progressive Era)
War
Bombs
Imperialism
People like them
Things Reactionaries hate:
Gun-control laws
Animal rights
"hippies" (that is, people less far to the right than they are)
Freedom for non-whites, gays, women, etc.
Obama
The ACLU
Taxes
America (as it is after the Progressive Era)
Unions
Protecting the environment
"Mexicans" (their term for all Latin-Americans)
Fruits and Vegetables (both the food and the people)
The Illuminati
Jews
The "NWO"
Other countries that aren't America (such as France, Sweden, Japan, and Iran)
Socialism (including social democracy)
Muslims
Atheists
People who are different from them
And much more...
Related content
Comments: 48
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
These right wing reactionaries are just a bunch of white incells who are pulling out their hair over the fact that their shitty ideaology is going extinct. Also probably around half these might just be paid Russian actors as they practically spammed the whole internet with fake news to provoke conservatives into alt-rights and influence the elections
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Um… Jesus is not socialist. It's EXTREMELY blasphemous to lower him to human economic systems, especially ones as historically flawed as socialism. He is THE monarch of all mankind. He promotes virtue and charity to be practiced genuinely by every man in the name of God. Not petty thievery and "redistribution" of material objects.
As a matter of fact, this whole thing seems like a vapid, dismissive rant on everything you personally disagree with. Then again, this is a 2011 era meme, so I can forgive you. You've probably grown a lot since then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1. I'm progressive and I like guns
2. But isn't the illuminati an elite right wing secret organization?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is old. I like guns too. Arm the proles!
Also I know of the classical liberal Illuminati, and from what I hear the whole Illuminati conspiracy theory was a way to demonize classical liberals and the Enlightenment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So the illuminati are ok?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I dunno, I do think that there's forces beyond the control of a president or other government members but I just call that the bourgeoisie and capitalism.
Hence why the Wall probably won't be built. Because capitalism's need for cheap easily exploitable labor "trumps" (pun intended) a leader's desire for a stronger border.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For real? Is this Devianart? Images posted by a bunch of liberal crybabies?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You missed the biggest work! But that's ok you might have needed to attend a gun show to know...
www.amazon.com/William-W-Johns… www.williamjohnstone.net/WWJ/A…
This is actually far and away more radical than any of those, but Johnstone never got any major publisher onboard (Put out by Zebra), so all his millions of copies sold are a few thousand per gun show or tens of thousands for a big NRA shindig. Most renowned outside that world for his westerns, which are actually alright, but rely on "The Banker Did It" as much as mysteries rely on "The Butler Did It"
Much more likely to find copies hiding in salvation armies, value cities, flea markets, and swap meets than online.
Three major things that set it apart from Turner: Turner acts somewhat remorseful, like the people they had to put down were rabid animals what didn't know any better. (something you see often on any sturmie forum since the 90s really, the idea the negro can't control his urges, every riot held up as an example of such each time it happens, never seem to mention things like Darrien Hunt NOT spawning such a riot, even when the cops got let off by a favourably selected jury)
Turner also has a soft philosophical lean. Poor man's single-college-course attempts towards Kantian and Nietzschean explanations of how the post-war world works and why they gotta do what they do. Meanwhile...Ashes is just unashamedly all-out self-insertion revenge fantasy by a bitter old man what lost the ability to walk. So his Raines is a power-hungry gun-toting Rambo that will save the world from the disease of liberalism (and all its other associated -isms of course) one forcibly conquered territory at a time. Turner also doesn't feature any sort of real-world applicable violent suggestions past the obvious 'need to hang all dem traitors.'
Raines outlines an in-depth detailed plan for "cleansing" the entire city of New York. Actually worked out the logistics for such a thing, as if there were some scenario IRL where NYC would want to "go rogue" and the rest of the US were in danger of invasion/subversion from within. Naturally, Claire Osterman, the enemy leader's a Hillary-analogue. (this series was written back when Bill was just governor, mind you, this part isn't a recent screed) She's also the most recurring villain in the entire series, and is found near the end to have been responsible for the initial nuclear war exchange in the first place. (A little bit of life imitating art there, considering what Claire does to Serbia she did to Libya to touch it off.)
Final major difference? Dr Pierce did not die a billionaire. (Johnstone made around 2 off this endless spam of revenge fantasy books, as well as the aforementioned westerns)
Here's the descriptions for "D-Day in the ashes" and Danger as an example of how this series 'works'
First the Liberals took all the guns. Then they took away the people’s freedom. Now, Ben Raines and his patriot army are driving a weakened United States government into full-fledged retreat. Emerging as an unstoppable force, the Southern States are winning over one strategic ally after another, from the states in the American Northwest to the Canadian provinces—all wanting to be part of a society based on law, justice, and old-fashioned values enforced by the barrel of a gun.
But to be recognized by the world community, the Southern States of America must pay a price. The U.N. wants Ben Raines’s warriors to play cops in a world overrun by criminals, gangs, and cannibalistic punks. Now, Raines and his army must engage in an all-out war of liberation across a crime-ravaged Europe, one bloody mile at a time…
A Once-Great Nation
During the years following the nuclear holocaust that decimated the United States, soldier and survivalist Ben Raines has dedicated his life to rebuilding civilization from the ruins. But for America to rise again, the new laws must be as just as they are harsh—they must be Ben Raines’s laws.
That dude up there? Yea, this is much more likely to be that hombre's chosen rodeo.
My evidence it's self-insert? The best evidence is 3 specific incidents that should have left him an invalid. In Wind in the Ashes, a 47 foot fall onto his knees. In Courage, a bullet to the spine. And not sure which either Treason or Betrayal, but he's hit by a 2-ton pickup. What's the greatest power fantasy for someone unable to walk? To walk again. And that's exactly what Raines does.
Full recovery in all 3 incidents. The third time he's recovered within the same book!
Some other choice Raines quotes from those book backs. (I like how he always includes the name, as if we don't know who'd be saying that when he's on the damn cover)
“I’m sure that future generations will curse me for destroying the cities. After they do, they can settle down and rebuild. But for now, the cities contain the scum—they must go.” —Ben Raines
“We have to shift our base of operations and secure the rest of the world, country by country. We cannot permit our ideals and goals to die.” —Ben Raines
“We don’t fool around with two-bit warlords, punks, and thugs. If they oppose us, they’re dead.” —Ben Raines
also he's a massive hypocrite, as His Character rails against "racism" and drags along a Token Red Man sidekick, but won't hesitate to gun down even kids that aren't "acting right (white)"
and the so-called "mutant cannibals" are very steeped in what could be considered "rap culture." If Claire Osterman 'predicted' shillary's role in Libya, then the "night people" 'predicted' Baltimore and BLM and the mainstream media response to it. It's very likely "militarised" police have read this, or a similar series. Herbert Fisher's another good huge hypocrite this way.
My dad LOVED these books, praised them nigh-religiously even, said someone should compile'em as one, cut out the action, leave only Raines' power-drunken ramblings as a "bible for the next american century" which is how I even knew of these. Oh and hey, guess what. Former marine captain rendered invalid through illness. Just the person this was made for. There's a sort of 'underground reactionary' market full of these thanks to Johnstone, floating about large flea markets and bazaars. Few get sold online, but they move hundreds of thousands of copies.
Speaking of "American centuries" I wonder how many PNACers like Kristol, Wolfowitz, and Rumsfeld are also living out their personal crusader fantasies mimicking parts of these books in the Middle East. The way the invasion of Germany unfolds is very similar to the "shock and awe" plan for Iraq. Including the "protests by liberal weenies and terrorist enablers" sweeping streets of non-SUSA cities, and even a few leak over there. Unlike real life, the feminist death cult the Ninth Order was routed and force to flee and LAW and ORDER returned to civilised Europe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Except when they are not cosplaying...
Is that guy a midget?? Cause that is a rather large book/book cover compared to other books with that size titles.
Honestly he looks like an Atheist biased media combination of a Texas Tea party and West Boro Baptist Church stereotype's.
---Happy Easter/Palm Sunday Week!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So you're only counterargument is to make the people giving the arguments look dumb? You apparently don't have a leg to stand on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is rude and unnecessary. Disagreeing with people does not mean we have to treat them like idiots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
We should treat them like idiots if their idiots. They are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that some paranoid John Wayne wannabe shot a girl scout in the face for offering him cookies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Especially since the Girl Scouts are all a bunch of Marxist pro-choice lesbian feminists. (And that's bad BTW because the internet says so.) [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I hate people who make me want to live on another people and people who announce that they want to live on another planet
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'd feel much safer with this guy as my neighbor instead of you Communazis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Use of the word Communazis seriously? Sorry, but you fail history forever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Seriously, go read a history book. The Communists and the Nazis fought each other during WWII. Saying Communazis as a serious label would get you punched in the face by Germans and Russians alike if you said it to their faces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Seriously,STOP drinking the Kool-Aid. Communazi is a word I use to tick off lying libs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Even then, you still fail at history for using such a stupid word. Also, the Kool-Aid is a hell of a lot better than the Tea you drink. It doesn't make me a reactionary moron that is immune to facts and knowledge that you would learn in grade school history.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No.
Riiight.More Kool-Aid comrade?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Need some more tea there, pardner?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No,more Kool-Aid comrade?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is soooo true! LOL! There are alot of these assholes here in rural north Texas.
They don't seem to like me either. I guess it's because I'm mainly of Native American descent, I'm into Buddhism and Native American spiritualism, I like katanas instead of guns, I love Thai and Japanese food, culture and music, I love anime, cosplay and photography, I'm pretty liberal and open minded, and lastly I am an individual who likes to think for myself and not let the church control my life.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Just wanna make sure. Don't ever think Japan is like the super innocent country just because America doesn't like it. o.O Because Japan has done untold number of horrible acts on its Asian neighbours ESPECIALLY my home country, Korea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Then when you move out, you should consider moving to a big city that touches water. (NYC, Chicago, San Francisco, Portland, etc.) They're often more liberal than small towns in land-locked states.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
While I am inclined to agree with you, you also fail to recognize leftist reactionaries. Thats why I've abandoned conventional left right and right politics and settled for common sense. We're too distracted with rhetoric from both sides of the sprectrum.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm just noting the term "reactionary" as it is most frequently used. Like the John Birch Society in the 50s and other rabid "anti-communists" at the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
very true, and they get in large enough groups they can be very dangerous
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Or they just go on the internet and complain about stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do wonder if there's some kind of sexual aspect for them of the gun, since it is a traditionally phallic symbol, and reactionaries seem to feel like lesser beings without one or more on their person at all times, and they see gun control laws as possibly taking their manhood away and making them more feminine. I would say they see their political ideology as masculine and the ideologies of socialism, communism, anarchism, or even social democracy, which (at least in theory) emphasize inclusion, cooperation, and non-aggression as feminine. Therefore, I would assume that the reactionary is a hyper-masculine person (though not always male of course). After all, it's been well-documented that while men are more competitive and more likely to take unhealthy risks, as is beneficial in laissez-faire capitalism and often capitalism overall, women are more cooperative and more likely to think of the consequences of their actions, as in communism or anarchism for example.
For example, this article in The Atlantic Monthly [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't think you have a clear idea of what "Reactionary" means.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So then what would you say a reactionary is?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
An individual defined by their opposition to (reaction towards) social or political events or change. Typically used by a label by those seeking to make changes against those who oppose them, it's an ad-hominem designed to imply that a person's attitudes are reactive rather than proactive, and therefore can be dismissed; the ridiculousness of this position is demonstrated by the fact that somebody opposing a new law calling for the execution of gay people would be a reactionary.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Heh, yes to all of this, but with one exception:
I'm a revolutionary, and I like guns. Frankly, you can't have any hope of maintaining a revolution without them. Ideally, you won't have to actually use them on anyone (killing is wrong) but if you can't defend yourself you can expect to be crushed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm talking about the whole idea that EVERYONE needs a gun and not just A gun but MANY guns. And that includes assault rifles and sniper rifles and all of that stuff. A revolutionary (if we're talking about violence) would be mindful in his or her defense and know that a gun is not to be used like a security blanket (like a reactionary would). Reactionaries seem to worship the gun and believe they're less whole without one. A gun is sort of an extension of the self for them. For the reactionary, a gun is not just a tool for revolution; the gun to them is a way of life and the absence of one on someone else makes that person look suspicious to them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're describing less than one percent of law abiding gun owners. Most people who own guns are very mindful of their responsibilities in owning them. Those that carry them with them day to day actually get even more responsible, as they realize that a mistake in judgement (whether its where they go, or what their reaction to things is) can result in life-long consequences, including for themselves.
Gun owners do NOT want everyone to have a gun. Ask any gun owner if they disagree with the law banning convicted felons from owning a gun, and the few that say they do will add in that it should be a matter of the felon proving, after their sentence is fulfilled, that they have reformed and should be given their gun rights back.
You need to take a look in the mirror and see that the hate you're preaching is the very same hate you're denouncing.
Rumor control: "Assault Weapon" is a pejorative dreamed up by people who don't understand how firearms work. They are no more or less dangerous than a hunting rifle. They are not fully automatic, and fully automatics have not been very accessible to civilians since the 1930s. Since 1986, they've become even less accessible, as a civilian legal one has to have been made before 1986, making them all collector's items. When one can buy a semi-automatic (meaning one, and only one, round per single pull of the trigger) AK47 for $500 or a fully automatic one for $15,000, which one do you think people are likely to buy? Furthermore, most deer hunting rifles are more powerful, round per round, than the guns that have been labelled "assault weapons."
All that said, I'd love to see a world without guns. Because that would require that the world has moved beyond the possibility of war, crime, or abuses of the people by the government. The day that becomes a reality, I'll be the first in line to hand in every gun I own.
If ever there is created a device for self-defense that is both as effective as a firearm and is also 100% non-lethal, I'll carry one of those, instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0