Comments: 35
erykh [2010-01-13 01:16:02 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! Iยดd name it Freedom!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
enterprisedavid [2008-05-10 14:37:42 +0000 UTC]
i love this one
Beautiful
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Tizrak [2008-04-22 12:18:51 +0000 UTC]
Wow - this one is definitely one of your best!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Gullstar [2008-02-12 14:33:06 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely beautiful! -WOW!!-
If u carry on these FANTASTIC serie deviantations, than I'm certain that Earth is going 2 b just as pretty.
Carry on the fantasitc work.
and what do u think u will do next (another series? or just random pics?)
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
christwriter In reply to Gullstar [2008-03-10 17:06:37 +0000 UTC]
Well, right now it's simi-random pics. I have a couple of concepts I'm playing with, though. And Earth is defenately in the pipes. I'll be doing the sketches for it tonight, in fact...
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Gullstar In reply to christwriter [2008-11-07 20:18:45 +0000 UTC]
hi, just wanted to know hows the ideas for earth coming along?
Gullstar
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
meboeck [2008-01-05 17:43:01 +0000 UTC]
This is another amazing job! Again I love the pose. And I love that you actually know who Isadora Duncan is!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
christwriter In reply to meboeck [2008-03-10 17:03:58 +0000 UTC]
(Sorry for taking so long to get back to you)
Oh, yes. I took dance training for years, and still miss it. Even got my toe-shoes. Anyway, my dance teacher told me a few stories about Isadora. One was, of course, how she died, but the one I liked best was how she was hired to dance a minor role in a production of...well, I think it was "Midsummer Night's Dream", but I could be wrong--and she either scandalized so many people or danced so very well that she outshone the other dancers, because every time she danced the part they dimmed the stage lights. I genuinely wish I could have seen her dance. That's up there with seeing Sarah Berndhart preform and hearing Caruso sing. Three of the best preformers in history and they all predated technology.
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ACShadows [2007-12-03 23:55:22 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely amazing!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
jamesvaughnn [2007-11-19 18:59:37 +0000 UTC]
this one's friggin awesome!
love how you did the feathers.
(i'm not a really great fan of the color orange though)
great piece!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
christwriter In reply to jamesvaughnn [2008-03-10 17:20:31 +0000 UTC]
Well, the color was to balance things out. Thanks for the compliment, and GREAT sig. Amen!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ShatteredDynasty [2007-09-10 03:30:17 +0000 UTC]
This is awsome. I really don't know how else to describe.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
christwriter In reply to tintenklecks [2007-08-31 17:16:32 +0000 UTC]
Well, any critique that isn't too vague and general for me to figure out what to do is good. Even vague and general can be OK...especially if its "the picture looks flat". The only time I get annoyed is when the critiquer is vague about something that is just too complex for me to isolate whatever problem they saw. Like "You need to work on your anatomy" annoys the living crap out of me, not because I think I don't need to (I know I do) but because I'd like to know the specific spot so I can work on it. But other than that...critique is good all around.
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
christwriter In reply to tintenklecks [2007-08-30 16:55:59 +0000 UTC]
The color was really to balance out the set (which I still need to finish). The four images (air, water, fire, earth) are intended to be viewed together. The air-look colors are, I believe, blue and white. Blue is taken (water) and white...I'm not that good, for one thing (It's not white It's several dozen pale colors jumbled together.) and it wouldn't really stand out. Yellow balanced out the set, and was strong enough to hold up with the other three images. Besides...I live in Texas. The only time I see a cool, refreshing breeze is when I stand directly in front of the air conditioner.
As to your other concerns 1. Because pale eyebrows and eyelashes don't look right. My very blonde mother has to wear mascara, otherwise she looks like she doesn't have eyelashes. So it's a vanity thing. 2. Yes and no. Not quite to that digree (...I'll probably need to go in later and fix that) but I'd wanted a bit of a shadow there, from the sun, and I think I got a bit carried away.
And GOD, no I'm not offended. I've said it before, I'll say it again...I can't SEE things the way you guys do. I once did an entire picture (Seduction. You can look at it too) without realizing I'd painted the woman's hands on backwards. Didn't notice until somebody pointed it out. I see the process, the little bitty work I did...you guys see the whole picture, all at once, and can IMMEDIATELY spot the things I overlook. It's like writers can't edit their own work; artists can't critique themselves effectively. We can't. It's impossible. So no, not offended. I NEED comments like this.
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
minion-for-hire [2007-07-14 15:08:02 +0000 UTC]
This is a beautiful image, but it doesn't match with the elemental image of Air that I haev in my head.
You said it yourself about the colours being atypical, and I can see how white or pale blue might be a bit boring (and not contrast so well with "water,") but the colours here speak to me more of earth or fire than Air.
Still, the pose is perfect, and the flight of geese look wonderfully iconic, as you said. Bravo!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
stuntedsanity [2007-07-08 14:50:44 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic work, the front leg looks a little short but the painting is beautifully done. Great background too.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
HiddenRelevance [2007-07-07 23:56:30 +0000 UTC]
Man this is gorgeous! I love the tanned skin here.. air somehow always makes me think of deserts and shifting sand.. and this works perfectly here!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cooley [2007-07-07 08:28:22 +0000 UTC]
This is beautiful! I just watched "Winged Migration" and it feels like you've somehow captured the part of me that wanted to fly with those geese as I watched the film. I love the lighting too!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
SoraPyper [2007-07-07 03:16:16 +0000 UTC]
i really like the feathers and her hair but its pequeliar her skin seems rather blotchy? her hair seems a bit blochy too. but the feathers and the backround are all beautiful. the composition is nice too. i can never get myslelf to do compositions with such intense color schemes but this is beautiful.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
christwriter In reply to SoraPyper [2007-07-10 09:41:14 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
The blotchyness is because I've never painted darker skin-tones before, and had no idea what the bloody hell I was doing the entire time I did it. And of course, I had to try to get skin texture at the same time, and threw god-awful jpg compression on top of THAT...
Oh, well. Hopefully the next time I try dark skin, it'll come out better.
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
IanWM [2007-07-06 23:49:02 +0000 UTC]
Canadian Geese are evil bastards. Seriously. I've seen them mug people.
Other than that, it's a beautiful picture. The only thing I can add is a tip from portrait photography: When a person's foot is in the picture, try to angle it so their sole isn't showing. It doesn't seem to apply to bare feet, but for some reason people find the bottoms of shoes distracting.
But really, beautiful work.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
christwriter In reply to IanWM [2007-07-13 03:11:41 +0000 UTC]
Thanks.
Oh, I know geese are evil. But they're still beautiful birds to paint.
...I'll keep the foot thing in mind. In this case, it would have been anatomically impossible to keep the sole out of view...at least, I think so. In the future, I'll avoid it.
CW
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
bekkia [2007-07-06 21:49:51 +0000 UTC]
beautiful!!! you have such skills!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1