HOME | DD

County1006 β€” Submarine 'Scorpion'

#boat #foxtrot #longbeach #russian #submarine #usa #warship #california #scorpion #losangelescalifornia
Published: 2016-09-24 20:27:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 703; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description This is a close-up of the Russian Foxtrot Class diesel submarine B-427 'Scorpion'Β exhibited at Long Beach, California, with the RMS Queen Mary (see my gallery picture 'The Queen and her 'escort'').Β  I think this exhibit is currently closed.
Related content
Comments: 27

zanetwinsfromsodor [2022-03-02 19:23:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to zanetwinsfromsodor [2022-03-02 19:34:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zanetwinsfromsodor In reply to County1006 [2022-03-02 19:47:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Microscopics-UNTD [2017-02-26 07:07:03 +0000 UTC]

2017, they are making plans to move the submarine somewhere else.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Microscopics-UNTD [2017-02-27 13:43:32 +0000 UTC]

I hope they keep it nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OLIVER-YOUNG [2016-09-28 03:35:54 +0000 UTC]

The image made in wonderful and evocative wayΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to OLIVER-YOUNG [2016-09-28 09:39:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much for the comment and faving

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

4ajka [2016-09-27 18:02:21 +0000 UTC]

Russian?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to 4ajka [2016-09-27 18:09:44 +0000 UTC]

Yep! Thanks for faving

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 00:43:11 +0000 UTC]

Interesting! Would that have been the sub's actual water line?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 09:01:14 +0000 UTC]

I think so.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 11:26:20 +0000 UTC]

Ah. Quite well preserved too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 12:03:33 +0000 UTC]

Yes but I think she was closed recently owing to water ingress which gave her a list.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 12:23:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh, well it doesn't sound good for a sub to sink with guests aboard.

Well, sink without the ballast tanks being filled intentionally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 13:54:12 +0000 UTC]

A lot of forms would have to be filled in.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 18:01:18 +0000 UTC]

"Were there people aboard?"
"No"
"How many people were involved in the accident?"
"None, it never happened."
"Was it government property?"
"Yes, ask Vladamir Putin about it"
"Was the property inspected?"
"Of course it was, we look at it every day."

Hmm, you know what, I've been working on a model series of Thunderbirds done in the classic style (but with no budget), and that might make a decent plot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 18:13:14 +0000 UTC]

Ah, there you go! A project!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 18:16:20 +0000 UTC]

Yep, currently I have a story in mind involving a fully restored space shuttle that is fueled up with rocket fuel that respond to electrical signals (somehow) that gets stranded in space. Good use of all the machines in that one since the boosters and fuel tank end up in the ocean, it takes off and lands on a runway, and it goes into space.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-25 18:27:56 +0000 UTC]

Wow! Too much for me! Signing off for the night shortly Rocky!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 18:34:03 +0000 UTC]

That's the sort of stuff that happens when you end up with three models of Shuttle Discovery in different scales

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-09-26 10:08:19 +0000 UTC]

Small, medium and large!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-26 11:44:33 +0000 UTC]

It's more or less small, slightly bigger but with more detail, and largest with nice landing gear.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

artlovr59 [2016-09-24 21:05:27 +0000 UTC]

Nice shot! Submarines have nice lines.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to artlovr59 [2016-09-24 21:07:09 +0000 UTC]

Yep - they all look a bit menacing! Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

artlovr59 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 10:14:13 +0000 UTC]

Sure!
Yeah, menacing, too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to artlovr59 [2016-09-25 10:58:43 +0000 UTC]

True!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

artlovr59 In reply to County1006 [2016-09-25 11:07:41 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0