Comments: 30
MuckTruck [2018-03-22 16:42:47 +0000 UTC]
That's pretty juvenile. There are kids that look up movies like this, I think you are defeating your own purpose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Julesworld99 [2012-11-23 00:39:12 +0000 UTC]
I HATE people using my name in puns for shitty movies
thanks movie you made me hate my name
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CuttingRoom In reply to IAmTheUnison [2011-05-08 10:53:11 +0000 UTC]
Truly, it is the harbinger of the apocalypse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IAmTheUnison In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-05-08 12:47:12 +0000 UTC]
Really? How so? I find that intriguing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to IAmTheUnison [2011-05-08 23:59:37 +0000 UTC]
I just think it looks unspeakably bad. It's not only horrendously derivative in terms of it's humor and artistic style, it mashes Shakespeare with Garden Gnomes. And I love me some Shakespeare, but let's be clear, it's not taking the good stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IAmTheUnison In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-05-09 03:16:32 +0000 UTC]
Me personally, I haven't seen it, but I heard it wasn't the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SMOKER9 [2011-03-09 00:04:00 +0000 UTC]
Jeez, didn't think the movie was THAT bad... But maybe I should buy a gun just in case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to SMOKER9 [2011-03-09 01:45:54 +0000 UTC]
Please don't. We like you intact. Did you ever do that strip with E?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SMOKER9 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-03-09 03:12:44 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I'm planning on doing that this weak. Possibly gonna do it tonight and upload it tomorrow. Sorry it took me so long. I sort of took a bit of a vacation. lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
trivialtales [2011-02-15 21:26:58 +0000 UTC]
Oh gnome you didn't.
Also, this is exactly how I feel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to trivialtales [2011-02-16 02:58:12 +0000 UTC]
It seems to be doing surprisingly well out there too. I don't get it, and I don't want to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to trivialtales [2011-02-17 14:05:24 +0000 UTC]
No, sir. I hold to my claim that the movie is evil.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CuttingRoom In reply to StarCentury [2011-02-16 02:58:51 +0000 UTC]
That's Hollywood's definition of profitable. Therefore it's their definition of the future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to StarCentury [2011-02-16 04:21:28 +0000 UTC]
I think they made an X-Files movie with that as the title. If they didn't, they should.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CroctopusArt [2011-02-14 06:57:24 +0000 UTC]
I love the expressions on their faces in panel 2!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jeffcouturier [2011-02-14 04:24:38 +0000 UTC]
Pretty much summed up my thoughts when I first saw an ad for this shitpi-- I mean, movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to jeffcouturier [2011-02-14 22:28:22 +0000 UTC]
Know were you going to say shitpile, shitpie, or shitpiccolo?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kaioh-the-PureMage [2011-02-14 03:26:16 +0000 UTC]
*clap clap* Incredible.
"Oh happy bullet, this is thy chamber, here rest and let me die!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mjtfreeze [2011-02-14 00:06:04 +0000 UTC]
That's how I felt when I heard George will be re-releasing Star Wars films in 3D, new season of clone wars 3d being green lit and him not ever releasing the original movies in HD without the extra cgi/ re-edits/ changes/alterations.
This comic made me laugh, but not as much as your comment about editing the bible. Checked out the blog, Mad Max and few others made me roll on the floor. The bloodied window defies physics, just like The Matrix.
M: The blood splatter doesn't correlate with the double suicide.
C: How so...
M:If one bullet killed both men, then there would be one large high velocity splatter.
C: Which means?
M: Two more dead men. The victim whose missing....*puts on shades* and the killer when I'm find him.
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Polarus39 [2011-02-13 22:10:36 +0000 UTC]
They ARE defiling a brilliant piece of literature. Also, garden gnomes are freaking scary O o lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1