HOME | DD

CygX1 — Spacetime Warper

Published: 2006-08-13 02:10:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 8950; Favourites: 91; Downloads: 278
Redirect to original
Description Apophysis
Related content
Comments: 82

InfiniteIterations [2006-09-04 15:03:25 +0000 UTC]

Wowwwwwwwwww...great detail and clarity! Super job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to InfiniteIterations [2006-09-04 15:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the great comment, and for the as well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VeronicaIsabel [2006-08-29 02:55:11 +0000 UTC]

It's beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to VeronicaIsabel [2006-08-29 12:18:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment Veronica, and for the as well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeronicaIsabel In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-30 03:16:55 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lOst-ParadigmS [2006-08-26 03:27:30 +0000 UTC]

You do Incredible Fractals... this one is amazing Ill fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to lOst-ParadigmS [2006-08-27 01:07:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the great comment and !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

McJohnalds [2006-08-25 12:17:07 +0000 UTC]

i zoomed in and i noticed that all the tubes were made up of individual lines!
that is so amazing! i love the level of detail you put it.

interesting idea: scientists have finally figured out a way to travel through time and when they're testing it something goes horribly wrong and they end up getting trapped OUTSIDE the space time continuim.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to McJohnalds [2006-08-25 16:11:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this very nice comment!

About your idea, it's leading us to an interesting question: what is there outside the spacetime continuum? For now, we are totally unable to know it, as it means outside of our space, and outside of time! That's certainly a very good idea for artistic creation, as it stimulates imagination!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

McJohnalds In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-26 01:37:15 +0000 UTC]

i recently watched this documentary on string theory and it said that the universe as we know it could be just a tiny part of something much bigger, like a slice in a loaf of bread. But at current stage we have no way to access what lies beyond. Think about it this way: we are living in a kind of cinema screen. The entire movie theater is right next to us in every direction but we can't reach out to it because we are confined to the screen. There could be an almost infinite amount of parallel universes and extra dimensions out there and we don't know a single bit about them!

so the possibilities are just endless! if we were living outside of time we might not appear to age but would our life clock still keep ticking? i am definitely studying this when i go to uni!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cmptrwhz [2006-08-21 03:17:40 +0000 UTC]

I really like this one, what a beautiful rendering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to cmptrwhz [2006-08-21 10:51:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this nice comment and for the too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cmptrwhz In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-21 14:22:10 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome, it was most beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ViraA [2006-08-19 12:48:46 +0000 UTC]

Superb render - perhaps my favourite of your artwork

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to ViraA [2006-08-20 01:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment and for the too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sean723 [2006-08-19 00:57:26 +0000 UTC]

really beautiful colours, i love this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to sean723 [2006-08-20 00:43:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for this nice comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zzzzra [2006-08-18 22:43:32 +0000 UTC]

Bon c'est cool tu t'es définitivement trouvé un style bien personnel, et en plus je l'aime bien

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to zzzzra [2006-08-18 23:55:02 +0000 UTC]

C'est assez difficile de se trouver un style personnel au milieu de tout ce qui se fait, surtout en tenant compte des contraintes du logiciel... Je m'efforce d'essayer sans arrêt de nouvelles choses, et je suis heureux que tu apprécies mes expérimentations

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zzzzra In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-18 23:59:40 +0000 UTC]

Disons que se trouver une style avec Apophysis a l'air possible, à condition de vraiment bien maitriser le programme. Mais c'est très loin d'être le cas pour moi héhé

Par curiosité, tu utilises en général combien de triangles pour faire tes images ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to zzzzra [2006-08-19 00:16:31 +0000 UTC]

En général 3 ou 4. D'après mon expérience ce n'est pas le nombre de transformations qui compte (de plus, un grand nombre de transformations rend très difficile l'ajustement des couleurs du fractal), mais plutôt les variations utilisées sur chaque transformation. Regarde ma réponse à =booleann-angel 2 commentaires au dessus du tien pour une explication plus précise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zzzzra In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-19 00:21:53 +0000 UTC]

Ok merci. Mieux vaut donc que je commence par me pencher sur le dosage de plusieurs transformations par triangle, et bien limiter leur nombre. C'est une bonne piste à suivre !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to zzzzra [2006-08-19 00:23:11 +0000 UTC]

Tout à fait

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sequential [2006-08-17 09:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Well done! Gorgeous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to sequential [2006-08-17 12:51:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this nice comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leanndra51 [2006-08-16 21:54:28 +0000 UTC]

Well, I see I have missed so many images! I am not getting deviations to show up on my page. I am going to be so very far behind!!! This is beautiful! I would love to know how you do these!!! Amazing details! Got a tutorial?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to Leanndra51 [2006-08-16 22:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Not at this time, but this may come in the future! However, I think you don't need any tutorial, your fractals are already awesome!

Thanks for your comment and Lea!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Leanndra51 In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-18 05:38:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I try to come up with different and unusual flames. I have lots of scripts and I go in and change some of the values and save them as alternate files, so I still have the original ones. Believe me, I am no 'mathlete'! Sometimes they work, and sometimes they don't. Sometimes I will use 2 or 3 scripts on the same parameter file. Not more than 3, because the flame gets too trashed looking I think.

Your flames are so different, beautiful and unusual!
When I first got apophysis 2.02, I used the transforms and the mutation window. Then as each updated version came along, I stopped using the mutation window and started using scripts and trying out the different combinations of variations. But I never went in to the transform editor and changed the values there. Never did that till the beta version. It is an amazing program! I love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to Leanndra51 [2006-08-18 09:29:20 +0000 UTC]

I agree, the transform editor in an incredible tool and, in fact, the only thing I use in Apo. Most of my flames are created from scratch (blank flame button), by slightly moving the triangles and by trying different values in the variations tab, changing only one variation at a time by small increments to clearly see what it does, then trying combinations of variations (2 or more variations on the same transform, my record is 6 on one transform, all useful in the final pic).

With this method, it's incredible the number of different fractals you can generate, even with only 2 or 3 transforms. To me, all is in the variations and their relative weights: in a given fractal [linear 1, sinusoidal 1, spherical 1] may be horrible, but for example, [linear 0.9, sinusoidal 0.1, spherical 2.3] may be fantastic! All is in the weights...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Leanndra51 In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-20 17:33:36 +0000 UTC]

The few flames I have made from scratch have been ones I created while doing a tutorial. I don't seem to have that 'touch' like so many people do. The farther along I go, the worse the flame looks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rainydaysaint [2006-08-16 05:00:22 +0000 UTC]

This is outstanding!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to rainydaysaint [2006-08-16 10:56:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your comment and for the !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sengirvampire [2006-08-15 21:04:42 +0000 UTC]

I love the colours and the lighting its got this wonderful serealist feel to it id be kicking myself for a week if I didnt this really well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to Sengirvampire [2006-08-16 06:59:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the nice comment, and for the too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jarrich [2006-08-15 01:00:45 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes you come across some fractal art that makes you think "wow". Well... this is one of those wow's. I love it. Wonderful detail in this one, a truly beautiful piece. I'm jealous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to jarrich [2006-08-15 09:30:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for such a nice comment, I really appreciate it. Thanks for the too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

baba49 [2006-08-14 12:17:54 +0000 UTC]

Stunning! Love the glow, the color, the many details. You really have found your speciality with this flame. Wonderful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to baba49 [2006-08-14 14:11:13 +0000 UTC]

Barbara, thank you for this very nice comment, I really appreciate it, and for the too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MescalineBanana [2006-08-13 21:12:28 +0000 UTC]

Incredible. As a long-time Apophysis user, I salute you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to MescalineBanana [2006-08-13 21:51:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this very nice comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

justravelin [2006-08-13 20:04:48 +0000 UTC]

Astonishing detail and depth, Luc! again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to justravelin [2006-08-13 21:51:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment Jann, and for the too, I really appreciate them!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

justravelin In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-13 21:55:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

live2b [2006-08-13 17:00:51 +0000 UTC]

Another exciting trip into the unknown!! Great color and lighting!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to live2b [2006-08-13 21:49:54 +0000 UTC]

Ginny, thank you very much for this comment and for the too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

live2b In reply to CygX1 [2006-08-13 23:32:09 +0000 UTC]

You're most welcome Luc!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kaish [2006-08-13 15:27:42 +0000 UTC]

oh the standard of these just gets better and better, absolutely fantastic work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to Kaish [2006-08-13 21:48:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot, for your nice comment and for the too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ann-McLaren [2006-08-13 15:25:28 +0000 UTC]

Neat.. Another wonderful ride..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CygX1 In reply to Ann-McLaren [2006-08-13 21:47:21 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Ann!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>