Comments: 53
s3vendays [2009-06-21 20:10:07 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome. NIce job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tim-Reynalds [2008-10-08 20:06:48 +0000 UTC]
absolutly fantastic. i love it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Maddog37 In reply to DimensionSeven [2008-09-05 16:08:34 +0000 UTC]
Haha okay, because it doesn't look like it!
Well I've known a few of artest that do landscape in a set so...
But ur really good by the way!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thinking-Silence [2008-08-25 22:48:50 +0000 UTC]
great.
so you think such a filter works on an eos camera?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to Thinking-Silence [2008-08-26 14:48:56 +0000 UTC]
It works on EVERY digital camera that you can get your hands on, no matter the size, brand, price or age. CCD sensors, CMOS sensors, even Fuji's and Sigma's exotic sensors can record the infrared spectrum, or even cell phone cameras. The problem is, that all sensors (except for some very old, 2 MP compact cameras) have an infrared-blocking filter built in front of them (it's called the hotmirror), to prevend infrared light being recorded on regular photos. The infrared filters let only infrared light through, so if you use longer shutter speeds, than the strenght of the hotmirror, you can get a decent exposure. The strenght of the hotfilter varies from model to model. Here you can compare a few: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to Thinking-Silence [2008-08-28 08:50:22 +0000 UTC]
The 6 megapixel Nikon bodies (D100, D70, D70s, D50, D40) do have a weak hotmirror, it must be these models that this article is referring to.
Actually, there's not a big difference in the optical performance of IR filters, the most wide-spread (and recommended) filters are Hoya R72, Cokin 007, and Kenko has also relesed a similar one. They all cut around 720nm (it's also called near-infrared). The less frequently used 960nm filters (far-infrared or deep-infrared) produce black and white images.
The Hoya R72 is a screw-in filter, no need for shading (just the regular lens hood). The Cokin 007 is a square filter, it needs some sort of custom made shading because light leaks in. The Hoya is expensive and only good for one filter thread size, the Cokin is a lot cheaper, and good for all your lenses with an adapter ring.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thelios [2008-08-25 03:18:26 +0000 UTC]
simply great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Figay [2008-08-24 22:57:10 +0000 UTC]
I can hardly find words to describe this. Otherworldly is the best I have heard yet.
o:
<3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fr3a [2008-08-24 18:49:24 +0000 UTC]
awesome!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bojkovski [2008-08-23 17:50:40 +0000 UTC]
beautiful.. good edit
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bigcbigc [2008-08-23 14:52:16 +0000 UTC]
ez nagyon ott van! a hrozontalatti rész mesébe illő, de az ég nekem nem igazán bejövős... hogy készül egy ilyen?
grat!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to bigcbigc [2008-08-23 19:09:05 +0000 UTC]
Az előtér és a háttér közötti több kilóméteres távolság miatt a badacsonyi hegyek kevésbé exponálódtak. Pontosan én sem értem miért, hiszen a pára ennél sokkal-sokkal nagyobb távolságban sem okoz gondot infrában. A felhők meg maradtak kékesek az utómunka során, kézzel nem akartam belenyúlni, csak generál műveletek történtek Capture NX-ben.
Pontosan mire vagy kiváncsi amikor azt mondod 'hogyan készül egy ilyen?'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
liveaswedream [2008-08-23 14:36:45 +0000 UTC]
Beautifully composed. And the IR of course.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Days-Eye [2008-08-23 13:55:00 +0000 UTC]
Looks great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ideoda [2008-08-23 13:44:58 +0000 UTC]
Uh, ez igen!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
davincipoppalag [2008-08-23 10:43:53 +0000 UTC]
Surreal..yet serene
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>