HOME | DD

Engine97 — Western Maryland 834

Published: 2015-04-05 20:24:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 962; Favourites: 13; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description WMSR 734's Historical counterpart. The Real 734 (www.northeast.railfan.net/imag… )  was nothing like 734 looks, but the real 834 (digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/… ) looked just like WMSR 734 does today.

Yes, this is a digitally edited picture of 734.
I take no credit for this picture other than the digital editing.
Related content
Comments: 16

Rockyrailroad578 [2015-04-05 20:59:46 +0000 UTC]

I see what you mean there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2015-04-05 21:10:54 +0000 UTC]

The difference is crazy! I can't believe it was numbered 734.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 22:40:43 +0000 UTC]

Next rebuild, they should consider renumbering her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2015-04-05 23:02:05 +0000 UTC]

Everyone knows her as 734, it would be bad for business.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 23:04:28 +0000 UTC]

Here, borrow this;  
Now go back to when she was new, and re-arrange the headlight and markers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2015-04-05 23:16:10 +0000 UTC]

Alrighty then!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

railguy365 [2015-04-05 20:47:01 +0000 UTC]

Wow! No kidding about the 834. WMSR should fix her up to become 834. Nice job with the editing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to railguy365 [2015-04-05 20:48:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I agree, but they said "It's 21 years too late". Maybe some day for a photo freight they will.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

railguy365 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 21:41:17 +0000 UTC]

They did that a few years ago for a Lerro charter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to railguy365 [2015-04-05 21:48:02 +0000 UTC]

It was renumbered 729 I think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

railguy365 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 23:13:10 +0000 UTC]

That sounds about right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SAR500 [2015-04-05 20:39:44 +0000 UTC]

Very nice shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to SAR500 [2015-04-05 20:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, but I didn't take it , I just edited it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SAR500 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 20:46:08 +0000 UTC]

Ah still nice machine though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to SAR500 [2015-04-05 20:49:09 +0000 UTC]

Agreed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SAR500 In reply to Engine97 [2015-04-05 20:57:28 +0000 UTC]

  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0