Comments: 677
liampixels In reply to ??? [2023-04-11 23:01:11 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Mimilop-Memes [2022-03-03 07:12:40 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
JRodge12 [2021-10-11 06:50:29 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Paulthored [2020-01-19 01:46:50 +0000 UTC]
Physical proof? Jesus Christ Exists.
Provide evidence that he lied about being God, and explain how/why; he did it/got away with it
/convinced scholar's back then of his message and statements
/convinced others to die for him
/convinced others to suffer through torture, poverty, and death for him
/fooled eyewitnesses to the point that they wrote down OUTSIDE of the Bible many of the things you dismiss
/was born/lived/died into fulfillment of over 300 Old Testament Prophecies, among which is the specific Bethlehem of his birth(which is the first thing scholar's back then would have checked, and recently the burial site with the bodies of the Bethlehem kids were discovered) and the method of his Crucifixion (centuries prior to its mainstream use & before its own invention)...
/the shear fact that compared to even multiple contemporary historical figures, the evidence for Jesus Christ's existence is magnitudes greater than essentially anyone, from multiple non-biblical sources
/the fact that just from quotations made by first century Christians, we can recreate a majority of the New Testament
/the fact that for four centuries, up to the council of nicea, Christianity/Christians were essentially exempt from legal protections in Roman territories, yet still persisted
/how about how during those 4 centuries, even though both the Roman & the Jewish authorities were only able to present evidence of falseness by making it up, despite really intense attempts to find any
I could go on with what you would have to provide to convince me that Jesus Christ doesn't count as a legitimate proof of God's Existence/LOVE, but I think that I've given reason enough for the burden of proof to fall into your court.
Peace! And thank you for your commitment to the comment section. Many of your peers don't accept that kind of feedback.
So God bless you!ππβ
Edit: As to your position on GOD being all loving...
I find a logical error in your reasoning.
Specifically, GOD is also All Knowing, Omnipresent, and All powerful.
So while your geographic observation might seem like it has merits, God's already on that.
I could point out that God also has no earthly methods to get to the miscarried/aborted, as well as the isolated.
So how could the message/Bible reach said person's before they croak?
Simple, God will take care of it personally. I don't know the specifics, but the Bible specifically points out that the Bible is for those who get to hear it for their salvation. It doesn't contain anything else that isn't needed for their salvation. Including what else God is doing behind the scenes.
Since I know God is Love, I know that he will take care of it even if he isn't telling me it now.
As to Muslims, many Christians who were Muslims speak of dreams of Jesus even though they were unaware of him/his message prior to that.
Take that as you will. I know its sounds cheesey, but remember, this is in the land of Islam/jihad... They have less than no reason to joke about this matter. Just admitting to having Christian thoughts is risking their lives and the lives of their families. Sometimes from their families.
Peace again!
π: 1 β©: 1
CuteTrish [2019-09-17 07:36:57 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 2
Meztli72 [2018-10-03 03:53:35 +0000 UTC]
"never all loving" = a false god, for millions of believers.
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-07 20:22:56 +0000 UTC]
Is this an atheistic pov, or a non-christian still religious one?
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-08 07:27:33 +0000 UTC]
Point of view
π: 0 β©: 1
Meztli72 In reply to Xenomaster [2018-10-08 19:11:15 +0000 UTC]
Well, I'm Christian, but you can apply this statement to lots of non-Christian people who believes in an all loving God. At last it depends on people's approach (the opposite quality, non all loving, can be seen in extremist beliefs). ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-08 20:23:53 +0000 UTC]
Well, I do think it best applies to the Abrahamic god as there are plenty of things he does in the bible and supposedly today which is clearly not all loving
π: 0 β©: 1
Meztli72 In reply to Xenomaster [2018-10-09 00:45:18 +0000 UTC]
Because the Bible has lots of contradictions. The Bible is not 100% true if we take the text literally. Moreover, there are plenty of other sacred scriptures which are lost, or are not part of the Bible canon. I don't believe in the 100% accuracy of the Bible, but I accept and respect it until it's well translated.
If Bible were 100% true, the text clearly would show a God of the same qualities along the entire text.
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-09 09:07:30 +0000 UTC]
I don't mean contradictions. You can make contradictions whether you are good or bad. I'm talking about the flood, slavery genocides and the promise of infinite torture
π: 0 β©: 1
Meztli72 In reply to Xenomaster [2018-10-10 19:08:32 +0000 UTC]
I can't believe it: at the same time, you don't believe in God (because you assume He's a murderer) and assume LITERAL Bible text from AT (the Torah) as a true story!!! 0_0
(Well, if you claim Bible is not the word from God, who cares about literal text showing what I claim as showing a false God?).
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-10 19:20:05 +0000 UTC]
Wrong. I don't believe because I don't believe. I can still say he is a monster and gave examples from the New Testament where he does endorse slavery and there's the torture in hell for all time.
I care because I share a world with people who do believe and do things motivated by those beliefs
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-22 08:47:07 +0000 UTC]
Well, it is clearly the god you believe since it is right there in the holy book
π: 0 β©: 1
Meztli72 In reply to Xenomaster [2018-10-22 17:14:23 +0000 UTC]
One more time, false. The Bible is not the ultimate truth, as I said. Do whatever you want. End of discussion.
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to Meztli72 [2018-10-22 17:16:09 +0000 UTC]
Question: Is your god infallible?
π: 0 β©: 0
kittakitkaty [2018-08-26 17:43:46 +0000 UTC]
Well I've never seen that in the bible
Guess I should read it again to make sure
π: 0 β©: 0
sarahsuz [2018-07-23 19:03:20 +0000 UTC]
Lies
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to sarahsuz [2018-10-07 20:24:29 +0000 UTC]
The flood, witch burning, stoning gays and unruly children, commanding slavery and misogyny, demanding obedience and will torture someone for all time because they didn't believe his son was proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-proto-David Copperfield.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
sarahsuz In reply to Xenomaster [2018-10-07 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]
its called a punishment. something everyone needs.
bet your having fun commenting on every comment that disagrees to this, I'll pray for you.
Try reading the bible before you go up against someone like me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to sarahsuz [2018-10-08 08:16:41 +0000 UTC]
And yet punishments are only valid if those being punished knew what they did is wrong (which is why we don't punish the mentally ill as we would a violent criminal, or how you wouldn't punish an improperly trained employee), because god didn't lay down any rules until Exodus, we are never told how/why the world became/is "wicked", witches don't exist stoning people means their death (you'd stone kids, what is wrong with you), being gay is not something harmful,Β slavery and misogyny are bad things (odd how you didn't object to how the bible treats women like cr*p), obedienceΒ is earned, not demanded.
And above all the punishments have to be proportional. If my kid yells at me, I am not going to beat him to death with a rock. And burning someone for eternity is infinitely worse than anything anyone can do
Here's the thing, kid. I read the bible. It is a cavalcade of immorality and your god's failures. You're the one who needs to research before going against me.
π: 1 β©: 0
| Next =>