HOME | DD

Gaston25 — OMAC?

Published: 2011-02-24 08:28:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 950; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description I had a lot of fun with my last drawing using the Wacom tablet and wanted to get a little more use out of it. What started out as a sketch quickly turned into a drawing that I am REALLY proud of.

This drawing is 100% digital, and for those of you that use a Wacom daily, it's not a big deal, but I hardly use mine and am really pleased with this result. (I get frustrated when I use the tablet)

As far as the reason behind a female OMAC,,,, not sure, just kind of happened.

If anyone wants to color this, please feel free! Just give me a heads up.
Related content
Comments: 12

Ziggyman [2012-04-09 18:35:34 +0000 UTC]

I think her name would be OWAC.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to Ziggyman [2012-04-09 19:22:24 +0000 UTC]

Sounds good

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jeagerjack [2011-09-09 01:35:58 +0000 UTC]

I really love this take on the character, the Mohawk to me actually looks better on a woman based on this picture and you redesigned the outfit to make her look incredibly tough. Great work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to jeagerjack [2011-09-09 05:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kostmeyer [2011-02-27 17:30:11 +0000 UTC]

Not familiar with the subject matter but that's a fantastic picture - I love the crunching rubble at her feet - works really well with the pose.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to Kostmeyer [2011-02-27 19:28:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Kost, the rubble is one of my favorite details too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Heckfire [2011-02-26 13:18:20 +0000 UTC]

OWAC?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to Heckfire [2011-02-26 18:36:58 +0000 UTC]

haha didn't even think of that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DBed [2011-02-24 13:57:28 +0000 UTC]

I like this interpretation of OMAC... I like it a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to DBed [2011-02-24 19:19:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man, I really appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Weirdolod [2011-02-24 13:24:24 +0000 UTC]

That's pretty awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaston25 In reply to Weirdolod [2011-02-24 19:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Cool, thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0