Comments: 102
Yaiden [2011-01-29 15:44:18 +0000 UTC]
very awesome !
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to Yaiden [2012-06-28 15:51:53 +0000 UTC]
thanks! i did a girl as a sequal, not as interesting as it doesnt have a magical fish in balloon
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
THATGUYWHODRAWS [2008-06-08 13:51:49 +0000 UTC]
The lighting in this is just sooo good, awesome work. Love the Balloon!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
KaitieBaby [2008-06-05 02:55:53 +0000 UTC]
this is incredible!!!!
i love the balloon!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
MPMG [2007-11-14 18:54:11 +0000 UTC]
Looks fabulous! The fish really tops it off!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to MPMG [2007-12-10 05:22:20 +0000 UTC]
thankyou
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
BlackAndWhiteInColor [2007-10-16 20:30:52 +0000 UTC]
this is reeeaaallllly good
congrads on being so awsome, lol
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Anthropophagi [2007-10-03 06:55:03 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous blue glow
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
heavenisnearby [2007-10-03 06:43:20 +0000 UTC]
cute one ยด<3
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
stormycloud [2007-10-03 03:51:08 +0000 UTC]
I love how his eyes stand out.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to stormycloud [2007-10-03 07:43:00 +0000 UTC]
i had alot of trouble with the eyes, but alot of fun! thankyou
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to haleym8826 [2007-10-03 08:42:24 +0000 UTC]
thanks so much, and thanks for all your great comments
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
crazyamazinglisa [2007-10-02 17:25:08 +0000 UTC]
Ohh wow.. this is great! :fav+:
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
CrazyEyes99 [2007-10-02 17:11:35 +0000 UTC]
Lovely piece!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ShabzDen [2007-10-01 09:32:13 +0000 UTC]
really like the way u make features... ...nicely done
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
envy-libzy [2007-09-26 11:19:49 +0000 UTC]
YOU ARE SO TALENTED its unbelievable!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to TeaLady [2007-09-24 11:42:07 +0000 UTC]
thankyou very much!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
cypherx [2007-09-23 13:38:31 +0000 UTC]
In my opinion this is a paintover and you paintover most of your work.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to cypherx [2007-09-23 13:41:47 +0000 UTC]
thank god your opinions arent valued as much as your work
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cypherx In reply to gavwoodhouse [2007-09-23 13:44:21 +0000 UTC]
meh, I don't really... but the point is, saying an "opinion" that isn't based off of facts can be hurtful. Not everyone is entitled to their opinion, especially when their opinion is a series of rumors that stemmed from something that has nothing to do with my work, and is based completely on the fact that I'm a "bitch".
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
gavwoodhouse In reply to cypherx [2012-06-28 15:50:09 +0000 UTC]
i love your work!! and i love you!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
gavwoodhouse In reply to cypherx [2007-09-23 13:52:56 +0000 UTC]
i understand your point. you use photos (thats not a rumor) but it doesnt mean you suck, and your work shows it, its amazing. however its executed, which you do really well its the image itself thats important and most people know that
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cypherx In reply to gavwoodhouse [2007-09-23 13:57:48 +0000 UTC]
I don't always use photos. Damien's kiss had photos used in the foreground and background but not the characters which to me are the main attraction of the painting anyhow. Koi Boy had no photos used, though I did ref a pet goldfish and myself a ton. So yes, it IS a rumour that I only use photos. I've made it clear when and where I use photos as a constant. So when I have used them, of course I'm not opposed to people saying as much, but to say I only use them is just bullshite.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
gavwoodhouse In reply to cypherx [2007-09-23 14:08:24 +0000 UTC]
i use references for everything, and yeah it would be bullshit to say you use them all the time. you know im really glad you came and saw my pic, thankyou
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
cypherx [2007-09-23 03:03:14 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the homage
flattered and whatnot.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cypherx In reply to Kazeyoubi [2007-09-23 03:02:38 +0000 UTC]
as he pointed me over this direction, I'm reading this. Yes, I overpainted in the tutorial, but the majority of my paintings are just that; paintings.
I do overpainting, non overpainting, and all sorts of methods, so stop insinuating that my work is all overpainting. Anyone who has seen koiboy upclose (to what this homage was paid) would know it couldn't be an overpainting. Only an inexperienced person would assume otherwise.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Kazeyoubi In reply to cypherx [2007-09-23 04:09:19 +0000 UTC]
didnt mean to offend =/ that was just something i had heard from someone else
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cypherx In reply to Kazeyoubi [2007-09-23 04:11:54 +0000 UTC]
well it is offensive. Typically when I "hear" something from someone else, I try to validate the claims before I add my bit to the rumor mill and start telling everyone "omg can you believe, she only overpaints? She has no talent at all... even if your piece isn't skilled, you're better than her because like she totally cheats on EVERYTHING."
Yeah, after a while seeing that written everywhere can get annoying, especially when the people writing it are saying that they just are repeating what they heard. Very sheep-esque.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
| Next =>